No offense, but that sentence isn't coherent.

As a whole, I dont think thats true. In any case, I enjoy gameplay too, so average story is better then bad or no story. Basicaly, the point was, if some dont like Mario it isnt necessarily because theres no blood/violence. Beside, you can take note that I respect other gamer that do not care for a story or human like being interactions.

Well games are supposed to be gameplay first, and any story is optional, given that the definition of a game is playing it. Anyone who bashes a game for being all about gameplay and no story, that person is basically wrong, as they aren't disliking a game based on its own merits (people are entitled to their own opinions...), but on an assumption that a game, even a video game, is something other than it is (... people are not entitled to their own facts).

That's not to you, but anyone who assumes a game is required to have a story. It's no better than disliking Harry Potter for promoting satanism (something that is neither true about the books, nor even what satanism really is).

I still don't get your point. You previously said that the typical story of a Mario game is perfect for the audience Nintendo is aiming at and I responded by saying that that is gamers.

So unless you want to imply that people who play Mario games are not gamers, we aren't in disagreement here.

Well games are supposed to be gameplay first, and any story is optional, given that the definition of a game is playing it. Anyone who bashes a game for being all about gameplay and no story, that person is basically wrong, as they aren't disliking a game based on its own merits (people are entitled to their own opinions...), but on an assumption that a game, even a video game, is something other than it is (... people are not entitled to their own facts).

That's not to you, but anyone who assumes a game is required to have a story. It's no better than disliking Harry Potter for promoting satanism (something that is neither true about the books, nor even what satanism really is).

EDIT: Just remembered I need to add that I'm not counting genres that actually require stories, like RPGs and visual novels, since part of their definitions are stories that you can play, even if the degree of those varies a lot.

Even with your edit, I hope you realise your post is wrong. The definition of game is quite large "An activity providing entertainment or amusement; a pastime". 

What is a game for me may not be a game for you, vice-versa. Even working can be an interesting game even though the gameplay isnt so great. ; )

You're just taking the first sense of the definition and twisting it. A game is something that has to be played. That's why "activity" is in there, as it requires some kind of action.

That's not an opinion. That is the actual definition.

"You seem to forget that when you read by pressing the X button and enjoy it, your playing."

And people think I'm trolling when I call them the Playstory generation.

lol, your getting me wrong, it needs to be coupled with good gameplay too. Read the previous post too you will understand. The type of game I enjoy have good gameplay and story. Beside, I was already playing games 22 years ago, so im not so sure about your playstory generation.