I never said anything about your comment on prof's list. Actually I'd most likely agree with it, except that with you being on his list, I can't rule out that prof actually nailed all four of ya and you're trying to make that seem unlikely and sacrificing Truck to make it seem like you are just a townie on the right track.

The only bit I thought odd was "because scottie didn't turn up scum." As I said, I hope someone else will figure out why I think it's odd, but if not I'll most likely explain why before the day is up. I'm not pointing it out now, because I'm not sure it's actually evidence against you, but it does make me think less of your vote on Truck. So as far as that goes, I'm waiting to see more reasoning.

Just quoting for your attention. Please respond to http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3842604
Also, what do you think of SAK's post about you? http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3842788 

Dammit, no, I don't have to.  He'll post, or he'll die.  I can suspect him then. 

Everyone!  Tell us your opinion of the new rule!  Chop chop!  I want to hear them. 

Now, on the percentage thing, hat was saying it was a fail math joke, not math fail. As in he tried to make a math joke, and that was my thought as well at the time it was posted, but it failed to get any laughs. The fact that he didn't respond to zexen's clarification that it added up to 100% as it should actually backs this up: no lulz and explaining a joke is well less than useful. Still, a joke isn't a contribution either, unless there was an underling implication that hat disagreed with 'the certainty that there are 5 mafia'.

The "200 posts later" is certainly hyperbole, but it really doesn't make sense given the posts were fairly close to each other, both in number and in time. I can't imagine why hat would try to create the idea of a significant gap like that.

I'd disagree with you about there being a huge difference between nordlead's response on the number of mafia last round and zexen's this time around. Yes, nordlead gave a range while zexen gave an exact number, but both are responses that in all likely-hood give the actual number. It's only a connection if you are scum,(since you asked how many there are) since Heph was first to bring up the number of scum last round. Even then it's a stretch to say zexen must be scum because nordlead was last time. In all it's a somewhat interesting observation, but pretty meaningless in my opinion.

And I think you have points in the third link that they deserved a response from hat. Some of it is trivial, and some self-defense, but overall at the very least it should have prompted a "nice try, but you're still scum."

Oh, what's your take on Gnizmo now that prof is dead?
As for his vote, I think he meant that of the people he listed as being suspects, Stefl has a vote while you and radish have none.

Back to you and hat. All of this is really only valid if you're a townie, but a revenge vote(despite all the reasoning you may have, it can still appear to be revenge) doesn't make sense because it could just be another townie that is suspicious of you. I do admit that much of what hat says about you(parroting, a big post that doesn't say much, etc.) seems to be true. I just don't think it's enough at the moment to agree that you're scum, meaning the others I'm on to raise bigger flags.

If he's a townie, since he sees you as scum, it isn't very surprising that he's pretty much writing you off. On the hand, if that's the case, he should be trying much harder to convince others that you are scum. I wouldn't be that shocked if it turns out you're both on the mafia team.

I wrote you off because you sided with ST against me and i was sure you guys were mafia

But I'm prepared to listen to you now. So tell me what was it that made you so suspicious of Hat ?

Hey just put me out of my misery already, keeping me alive to get another free lynch is not very nice :(

It was obvious we were lynching just to end the day.

We didn't have any real evidence for voting and we were just taking an "acceptable loss"

Sigh... I think we're heading for a mod-genocide the way things are going.

I'm tempted to go back to my Silver-Tiger vote of yesterday just because I don't have anything new (apart the fact that scottie was town) but ST seems to be on his way to a modkill so I guess I'll know if I was right or wrong soon enough.

There's also a post from nen that rubs me the wrong way:

I don't get this defeatist attitude from nen, he's acting like his lynch is inevitable because many players are suspicious of him. I remember him being much more combative in other games when people were trying to mislynch him. This has me wondering if it's not a mislynch after all.

One thing I forget to mention before where did I side with ST? or is it just that I thought you suspicious for your reactions to zex early on day one?   That did partially come from the fact I did ask how many there were because I think it's a good thing to know.

Don't get me wrong i'm not really asking to get lynched, am just implying that i think he's scum.

That said am afraid waiting for a mod kill every 72 is not enough to get things moving here.