Linkzmax said:
How and when did you realize you've played a game with scottie before? |
since day 1. Since sign-up.
Linkzmax said:
How and when did you realize you've played a game with scottie before? |
since day 1. Since sign-up.
theprof00 said:
|
Explain: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3819798
"Is this scottie's first game? j0 asked this question in a post, and I think it really deserves an answer."
Linkzmax said:
Explain: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3819798 |
I don't remember why I wrote that.
Right now, I'm sure that we played a game together, at the beginning I was sure of that as well. But I don't remember the state of mind in which I wrote that... it's possible that I wrote that because of the sheer oddity of the post making me second guess myself.
I really don't know.
Linkzmax said:
@prof: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3834625: Back to our back-and-forth: Are you online and able to post now? Need a speedy response to a question. |
1) I think so too. Mafia are more than capable of throwing each other under the bus, that is a fact. I was really really hoping trucks would've voted though. Those other players, it's just such a small piece of evidence...but I was most strongly interested in trucks. To me, it ended up pretty much as a wash, but I've been looking at j0 as well, and his posts fresh off the absence are suspicious. The only problem now is, are they voting because he's mafia and want to look pro-town, or are they voting because he diverts a kill away from SaK, or are they just voting because they feel it's the right vote. Based on j0's comment, he really only reiterated what evidence was already there..that gives me a scum read, or at least not aware of his environment.
2) Well that post was meant to bully scottie into confessing. I applied pressure that would make him think that the town was an overbearing presence and saw through his scheme. For that reason, I said "we". I was hoping he would cave, but he never answered the post. Hopefully, he will skip right over this one and answer it before he reads this like he did with other replies.
Back and forth
2) guess I inferred more than what was written.
5) Simple curiosity. I think you are missing the point though, it's not just about you. It's why pick them and why so many. It wasn't an accusation, I wanted to get him to talk.
B) It only matters to ME, but you are correct, either flip is worth a more detailed look.
Bonus) That's normal. I was doing that with Gnizmo. At the point when I had written that, I had first accused, but then defended scottie, and not pursued any interest into those other players. So, I was saying "you are defending them", but keeping an open mind that he could be framing them. I was "playing along" with his post in the case that he was scum.
I'm puking my guts out for the last day, since I notified work via e-mail I figured I could take a second to notify you guys. What really sucks more than anything is this is the second time I got this type of virus/whatever this year and it really really really really sucks.
Be thankful we aren't playing this in person
Linkzmax said:
As FF points out, you've been soft-claiming cop. Is that the case? If so, why did you choose to investigate Nen? Regardless you're math is illogical and that always bugs me.(See the graveyard QT last round) You're begging the doctor to save Nen. Knowing this, mafia won't go after Nen. knowledgeable about who scum is than other townies, so they just continue picking off others anyway. Basically your logic fails. |
No, if I were cop I would have just stated it and then gotten mafia killed next round.
As for me poiniting out NeN, now the mafia wont go after NeN as you pointed out, which means that the doctor doesnt need to save him - I saved him with my statement. Even after you attempted to mess it up just then, the waters are now muddied. The mafia have gone from having a clear kill to not being certain, so I consider that a win for me.
Oh, and this is my first game of mafia via VGChartz (or any forum)
Barring the possibility that they may be one of a few dozen people whom I have played face to face games against, anyone who says they hae played a previous game with me is mistaken
Current votes (10 required to lynch): [2, L-8] ZEX: GNIZ, DTEWI [2, L-8] HAT: (PROF), WONK, VET [0, L-10] WONK: (HAT) [1, L-9] NEN: (ST), (PROF), (FF), SAK, (ZEX) [0, L-10] ST: (TRUCK), (NEN), (SCOTT) [8, L-2] SCOTT: MG, RAD, ST, STEF, PROF, HAT, FF, J0 [0, L-10] MG: (SCOTT) [4, L-6] SAK: NORD, (LINK), (PROF), (FF), NEN, ZEX, SCOTT
Current votes (10 required to lynch): [2, L-8] ZEX: GNIZ, DTEWI [2, L-8] HAT: (PROF), WONK, VET [0, L-10] WONK: (HAT) [1, L-9] NEN: (ST), (PROF), (FF), SAK, (ZEX) [0, L-10] ST: (TRUCK), (NEN), (SCOTT) [7, L-3] SCOTT: MG, RAD, ST, STEF, (PROF), HAT, FF, J0 [0, L-10] MG: (SCOTT) [5, L-5] SAK: NORD, (LINK), (PROF), (FF), NEN, ZEX, SCOTT, PROF