EBWOP: Should be

I'm not going to jump at anyone for having a leave at the moment, but I can't rule out Truck was hopeful that the night phase would come and go while gone as a way to "prove" he's not scum(or a non-vanilla townie).

Huh...

I think of all the players I would go for either Scottie or SAK right now...

They both did not contibute very much... or so it feels... but since SAK was a little more active and Scottie made this strange bandwagon I will jump onto Scotties lynchtrain until we get further info...

Vote: Scottie

for now...

also @ prof

I really don't feel like I am very catious... but so far I got lynched everytime when I wasn't a cop or did not pose as one ( I think I was killed by Mafia B once when I was Mafia A... ) and it could just be me wanting to not getting lynched again.

@ linkz

Huh? I was defending j0? I was just curious to get to know what he thought about him since I did not see anything really scummy about him. I did not say anything about the two others, but they have done things that can get them easily on that list. For myself, I did not feel to defend myself, since there were no real accusations, he just saids he thinks that about me, just like anyone can say it about anyone.

Odd, and I have no idea how that happened, but nice catch, and thank you!

Perhaps "defend" was too strong a word. I just find it odd that without any real accusations about any of them you decided to state "I did not see anything scummy so far about him" instead of asking for an explanation as to why your name is included in the list.

I just felt it was obvious prof would explain his reasoning on them all, or it would've have just been ignored by everyone, yet you purposefully threw in that line to pre-discredit prof in a way.

Your explanation now is fair enough, but what do you think of j0 now given his evidence?

--No, but it's about as strong.  Not exceptionally strong, but enough to lynch either of them -- versus anyone else right now, anyway. 
--Not that I can think of.
--Yes.  (But that doesn't mean I'd vote for a lynch I didn't think was reasonable.)

There have been games in the past where I have had two or three people I was completely willing to lynch, and swapped my vote around between them a ridiculous number of times because I just wanted to lynch one of them and I didn't really mind if it was one versus another among them.  I guess I can dig up the proof, or you can just get confirmation from others, or check yourself, or just believe me, or whatever. 

I'm going to believe you for now. It's not rare for anyone to switch votes around and if nobody does then this day will never end. I was really more curious if you had any additional insight since you didn't really give any reason, and it seemed you had hat pretty high on your list and might have switched that way.

Nah, I realize why it might have sounded that way when I talked about it, but actually all I meant was he has made it into my "would lynch" category.  nen, SAK, and, scott are all above him. 

First I'll mention the 3 votes.  At the time Truks had made the post there was only one person with more than 2 votes and 3 others with 2.  At the time of my post 4 people had 3 votes and hat the one I was refurring to was one of them.

My points with hat.

Started as a FOS over the numbers debate. Where I was pointing out his bad math moment and his bad comparison of what nord did last game to what zex did this game.

He really overreacted to that and the post it was in entirely.  Voting for me instead of discussing the points.  Saying I made no new points calling me scum and voting for me.

His latter reposnces to my first two issues with him.  One saying he had only responed 200 posts latter or 200 posts in when he was on zex with the numbers right from the start.  The way we was trying to distance himself from it bothered me.

Him just saying it was math fail when he didn't say that at all sooner when zex had said he thought he had the numbers right.  This one isn't much of a point on it's own since an error with addition isn't that hard it's just with the other "errors" of fact that make it much more like a trend than a simple error.

Those are what I recall without going back and rereading my posts and his.