theprof00 said:
(1)prime bandwagon span is this. It starts at the fourth vote (because that is a prime bandwagon spot...this is where a bandwagon really starts to pick up momentum) and ends at the tipping point vote (which is the vote that almost seals the rest of the votes coming in).
You are in that area along with ST, Radish, and zexen. Considering a no lynch, these are the spots that are most meant to "appear" pro-town. Yours was the only one that really acknowledged that it was too risky to try another lynch. Other players had different reasons. Yours simply stands out.
(2) so you don't like it because it makes you look like you're toying, or because you *feel* like you're toying? In any case, why would you be so worried about that? This makes me think that you don't want to draw suspicion to yourself.
Additionally, there are two mods to count votes. Voting and unvoting should not be a problem for them.
(3) Don't really understand what you mean here. There are 21 players. There were originally 20. It wouldn't make sense for the mods to add another scum simply based on an extra player being added. There are 3 townies to every scum, it would be completely imbalanced. So, even though GoW was modkilled, it doesn't affect anything. Before GoW was modkilled, we were at a very very good standing to survive a mislynch, thereby giving additional reason to lynch on day 1. After GoW died, the chances weren't that much worse. In an entirely equal 3-1 ratio, town can afford to lynch on day 1. If they don't, the interaction between mafia kills and lynches means that the game ends when mafia kills at night rather than when town mislynches the final day. In either scenario, town misses out on an extra lynch. If you don't understand, read my "mafia rules and hosting" thread for a more detailed explanation of how the numbers work out.
(4) Right. It isn't significant. One of the townies was an extra player who doesn't factor in to odds at all, and the other is a normal day 1 lynch where town has the best chances to lynch without impairment.
(5) I do? Please show me where I make you look like that. I find it hard to believe that that was a fact I was ignoring. More likely, it is you simply demonizing me with the argument that 'I always play like this'.
(6) If you mean that I am unpredictable, then you are correct in that. There's nothing I can really say against that reasoning, but I'm glad you brought it up.
(7) Your play consists of your argument that the number of players to scum is insignificant, your voting pattern, and your "safe" play. These are all tells in my opinion.
|
1- I voted right after noname post, that was the point that made me realize i will yet again vote no lynch.
And since we are allowed to make stuff up, no the prime bandwagon start right after my vote so am safe (that was easy)
2- Ignoring facts again huh. I always do this, this not unusual behavior. I always unvote before voting
and i vote by the proper manner & with bolded font. I love rules and i like to follow them.
So your reason is invalid.
3- You can't tell me how i should feel. Hep voted no lynch and said the same thing i did and he is a confirmed townie. So its obvious not all feel the same way.
And after playing in the game you hosted I'm really not interested in you thread >_>
4- see no 3 (no need to argue with facts)
5- See no 2.
6- Yep that what i meant
7-So you want me dead because you don't like my play style? You could have said that from the beginning
so i didn't have to respond to the first 6 9i hate long posts)
Sorry you feel that, but i just want to have fun and see if i can spot the scum. right now you & St are my top supcts
and since its getting late i need my beaty sleep i'm gonna
Vote: Silver-Tiger
and go to bed. good night.
; - ) : - ) : - ( : - P : - D : - # ( c ) ( k ) ( y ) If anyone knows the shortcut for 
, let me know!
