weird, i am swiss, but this completely passed me. btw. it doesn't mean anything if the "government is considering something" in switzerland, we have direct democracy so the last word will always have the people.

anyway, even though it's kinda strange, i think it'd be ok, the state shouldn't care about what happens in your own 4 walls as long as everything is consentual or criminal in some other aspect.

Legally, there's no reason to forbid any two consenting adults from having sex, and I wonder how such a law was created in the first place.

However, I also have to wonder what is suddenly prompting the repeal of such a law.  One would think it'd be almost incosequential in its effects on the general populace.  Did some politician suddenly get a hankering to screw a family member or something?

its kinda weird ¬.¬ but its there choice i suppose ^^

Don't like it, but couldn't care less if its between consenting adults. Don't be surprised if the kids have an extra finger or two though. The taboo exists for a reason and the practice will still be frowned upon.

The consenting part is the problem.

main argument often against incest is not the reproduction part but that in a family with a social order, sex will never be fully consenting (except with the wife), as one can put pressure on the other.

Nope, that's not correct.  If you start inbreeding with two perfect specimens then all seems fine at first, but if inbreeding continues (the issue is multi-generational inbreeding) then the end result is always negative.  Genetically, for complex animals you need an intermingling gene pool.  Too much in-breeding and you're going to see problems.

The odds are probably low, but the problem with incest is that if it were to continue over a number of generations - i.e. the son of a brother/sister with his sister and so on -  it will negatively impact future generations.

Incest tends to be instinctively frowned on for a reason - and the other issue I see is that it is very probable children of known incest (and the couples) would be discriminated against and receive abuse.  Not that this alone is a reason to avoid it, but it needs to be bourne in mind.

This kind of law wouldn't pass in any democratic country because of violation of your rights.... altough you would have the option to do it yourself if you are smart enough to care.

They didn't said financial contribution... support is considered contribution also... and in most place even with divorce generating wealth division, usually the man complain that he did all of that alone while the partner just staied at home.

And if you both choose one path it's your choice and you must stand by it... no one obligated you to marry or work for the other education... so you can't complain after that you sacrificed yourself for someone and now were throw away.

Seen really interesting life... altough i preffer myself today than with 15 years.

Ditto