theprof00 said: I understand that, but like I've said before, it's not a matter of who I am that is important. What matters is that fellow townies look at the evidence and decide for themselves. Too many people get caught up in the source and discount evidence. If I decide to run a wagon on a scapegoat just so I can see who would vote for them, that shouldn't be a problem to other townies. Sure you don't know what I'm doing, but you have access to all the same information I do. I put information on the table, right? Look at the post above. I named 4 out of 5 mafia in one post. If you think I'm not putting information on the table, well, I don't know how to argue that point anymore... |
"What you do speaks so loud I cannot hear what you say."
Look at your post, and then look at how no one else bothered to. Personally, I raised one eyebrow, gave you a mental pat on the back, and then shrugged, knowing that in the end it meant nothing.
That post proves exactly what I'm getting at: knowing what's what amounts to little if you can't rally the town around you afterwards, and your playstyle prevents you from doing so. Unless you can unilaterally act on your suspicions (i.e. you're the vigilante or cop), you've only gone through half the battle. And you should note that even if you roleclaim cop, your history makes it unlikely that you're going to be believed, so you may only be effective as the vigilante.
If you're comfortable with continuing with those results, then so be it. But I'm telling you now why it hasn't worked in the past, and likely won't work in the future.