Well I'm going to do my homework, but here's some food for thought, are you against or with lynching lurkers?

lurking is generally a scum tell right? It's not much, but if there's nothing else to go off of then it is probably the best pro-town move. Even if they turn out townie, inactives aren't doing much to help.

1) That's the understatement of the year. In your first game you were confusing to the point that scum wanted you alive because you provided such good cover for them.

2) Yes a lie can trick the Mafia. Let's say: to kill an unimportant player (if he hinted at being someone important) but it can also trick the doctor in protecting the liar and wasting protection.

3) Or people could have followed Heph's theory and lynched the fake android because they thought he was scum. Net result: one less townie.

Are you asking everyone this?

What's with the polling going on here?

Why are you afraid of discussion?

Why have we gone from random voting to random questions?

Because random stuff is fun!!

1) I have no excuses for THE FIRST GAME I EVER PLAYED. Needless to say, I only mis-lynched one person, and correctly lynched every other time. By the time you recruited me to cult, I flipped a coin to block either you or the other scum, and it ended up on him. I don't see how losing teammates is beneficial to the mafia, I was on every mafia lynch, usually pressing for others to vote. But yes, inexperience did me in in the end because I didn't realize how bussers could manipulate information like that.

2) "Yes a lie can trick the Mafia. Let's say: to kill an unimportant player (if he hinted at being someone important) but it can also trick the doctor in protecting the liar and wasting protection."

Hinting at being important is being "straight". You don't need to claim anything. 

Mafia will usually go after that person, because they usually expect the doctor to protect the person that is overtly hinting. I find that as mafia it's better to target the quiet ones. That's what I mean by "hinting at being important".

Like dtewi you're saying "stupid lies are bad". It's such a blanket superficial argument that it just reeks of scum.

3) Lynching someone for being an android is a very bad reason. Another simplification of a complex situation. You don't include any of the usual diatribe that would be in there. You simply act like the "lie" auto results in lynch.

You are sooo on my list. 

Personally, this looks like an attack

"1) You are beneficial to mafia

2&3) Lies lead to townies dying, and you condone lying"

which is interesting. Especially #1 shows that you have a bit of emotion invested in this, perhaps fear. A normal response should have only been 2 or 3, but the attacking part puts a scummy spin on it.

Still, FoS dtewi for blanket superficiality, and keeping my vote on you. 

ooooohhhh.

When I read this, I squinted and re-read it a few times while shaking my head.

I'm not sure what you're up to, but it's suspicious. 

I think my question is very warranted. Both your and his questions I would consider lynch-bait.

Prof, I get what you're saying, but I still think that the town should be very wary of lying, as it could lead to mislynches.