How do you make to be born active voice...

Sorry, off-topic, but just a random though.

really?

anyway, the english language has been abused for yr's(i've been doing it for 26 yr's with no sign of slowing down) but i don't think verbs are the problem, but punctuations are?

throughout school  i was a pillar in my english classes, and i know on this site i've single handedly destroyed the english language on several occasions, but punctuations are the real problem.

a study was done just afew yrs ago about this and the solution was to get ride of punctuations alltogether, but we all know it won't happen!

the real solution should be to learn english all over again; that would solve both problems

No, the solution is: Once your realize something is wrong, don't perpetuate it.

But they don't. Most people use "release" properly. A handful of of internet sources =/= the majority. I doubt you'd find this improper use of "release" in any major publication (especially printed). Again, once your realize something is wrong, simply don't perpetuate it.

To bear.

"To be born" means that you were born (beared, as such) by your mother.

I suppose you're right. "To launch" would be the transitive verb used.

I'll try not to say "releases" in future, but I can't promise the same of the other Feed staff.

No... I don't think that's right. 

Passive forms have the verb and the ablative of agent (in most cases). "To be born" doesn't have an ablative of agent. "I was born by my mother" doesn't make sense. :/

Hmmm... does English have deponent verbs?

It makes sense. It's just an archaic form which is no longer used.

"I was born by my mother" means the same as "My mother bore me", which would similarly never be seen or heard in modern day English. So, nowadays, it is a deponent verb, yes.

Hmmmm, any other deponent verbs beside that?

Hm, bear/born turns out to be a tricky one, maybe just in British English (not certain whether borne is a form used in American English).

The Cambridge dictionary lists (be) born as a separate verb. Maybe it's to avoid two past participle forms? e.g.
She was born into a rich family. vs She had borne him two children.
Or maybe it's the point of view.

Ended up googling for I was borne with the born meaning (rather than carried etc), and even found the two forms in the same sentence, with the same basic meaning. It's a translation of some old Hindu text, so it's probably also made to sound archaic even if it's a recent translation.

She was the daughter of a hermit, and was born into the world in this position in consequence of a curse; and I was borne by her to this excellent Brahman...

Maybe borne in this case accentuates on her bearing the child (to this excellent Brahman no less)? On that line, not too sure whether borne would be usable for things that aren't actual procreation. An idea was borne, a new legend was borne ... those don't look good to me, but maybe they'd have been fine in some more archaic text.

As for deponent verbs... I actually had to look up what it means, and pretty much everywhere it came down to Latin or Greek and how to translate them into English, which probably means English doesn't have them.
The definition wikipedia gives is: In linguistics, a deponent verb is a verb that is active in meaning but takes its form from a different voice, most commonly the middle or passive. A deponent verb doesn't have active forms; it can be said to have deposited them (into oblivion).

bear-bore-born doesn't fit that, it has active forms; if be born is to be viewed as a verb on its own it doesn't fit the description either since it's not active in meaning.