Reasonable said:
Basically I don't agree with the whole policy of review embargos. Be it films, games, or whatever. It simply defeats the whole purpose of reviews and giving the consumer visibility to information on what they are considering purchasing.
|
OP said:
The gaming press complains about not being sent review copies...
|
They are NOT preventing anyone from reviewing it. They just have not sent out the finished product yet, just like Gran Turismo 5 has not been sent out yet. The product is still in testing and NOT finished yet. If someone really wanted to review a game, they can drive to Macy's and test it out for an hour. How are people complaining about how the kinect sucks in every other thread if there hasn't been a review yet? It's just the reviews have been on test demos. If they sent every game reviewer a kinect right now, they would still be getting a test version of the software. People are blowing this way out of proportion.
I agree, movies can be reviewed a couple weeks ahead of time because they should have finished editing the movie by then. The problem is, instead of finishing the product and then announcing a release date, they finished the hardware, and announced a release date and are producing them to be shipped right now. The software that drives it is continually being upgraded and I'm sure once it's in a near-final state it will be sent to reviewers. Even Oprah's audience was told that it would be shipped to them by November 4. The software demos everyone is using is showing off a single game that has been finalized. Not a full xbox dashboard and 17 games.