darthdevidem01 said:
Carl2291 |
This seriously made me laugh my ass off XD
Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. " thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."
darthdevidem01 said:
Carl2291 |
This seriously made me laugh my ass off XD
Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. " thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."
Yakuzaice said:
If we are going to be so literal as to use a factor of 10 as an order of magnitude for video game sales, then the Wii version still wasn't on the same order of magnitude back when Fifa 08 was relevant because it didn't hit one million till this year. You were answering someone who asked why Fifa 11 Wii wasn't selling like the HD systems. That was obviously about the first week because that is the only data we have. My point was Fifa Wii never sold like the HD systems, even three years ago. |
I deliberately used the phrase "order of magnitude" in place of "nearly as much" or "on a similar level" to avoid arguments like this. The use of the phrase is correct, if the Wii version was selling less than 1/10 of the other versions, as it does today, it would not be selling on the same order of magnitude. It did back then. My mistake was assuming that people understood the phrase.
A game I'm developing with some friends:
www.xnagg.com/zombieasteroids/publish.htm
It is largely a technical exercise but feedback is appreciated.
Yakuzaice said:
Korea didn't get Wii Sports, just like Japan. I'm not sure what the situation is now with the Sports/Resort bundles. Japan didn't get those either, so it might be the same. |
Japan, Asia, and I believe Africa and the Middle East don't have anything bundled with the Wii.
hallowedbeeddie said:
|
Yup you could be right.

Demotruk said:
|
It's a phrase that has it's place, and describing video game sales aren't it. It is similar to decimated in that people rarely mean it literally in everyday conversation.
Anyways, arguing semantics is pointless. It doesn't matter that Fifa Wii was able to limp to the same order of magnitude that the HD versions sold. The relevance in the video game market is pretty much nil. It might do it this year as well, but it wouldn't change the fact that it still isn't "seliing on the wii like it is on the HD systems" as the person who kickstarted this said.
Yakuzaice said:
It's a phrase that has it's place, and describing video game sales aren't it. It is similar to decimated in that people rarely mean it literally in everyday conversation. Anyways, arguing semantics is pointless. It doesn't matter that Fifa Wii was able to limp to the same order of magnitude that the HD versions sold. The relevance in the video game market is pretty much nil. It might do it this year as well, but it wouldn't change the fact that it still isn't "seliing on the wii like it is on the HD systems" as the person who kickstarted this said. |
1) No video game that sells a million is irrelevant unless it had exorbitant costs.
2) The person I was responding to was asking a question, and I deliberately used the phrase "on the same order of magnitude" precisely because I knew if I claimed it was selling "nearly as much" or even "on a similar level" would get someone arguing about it.
A game I'm developing with some friends:
www.xnagg.com/zombieasteroids/publish.htm
It is largely a technical exercise but feedback is appreciated.
| Demotruk said:
1) No video game that sells a million is irrelevant unless it had exorbitant costs. 2) The person I was responding to was asking a question, and I deliberately used the phrase "on the same order of magnitude" precisely because I knew if I claimed it was selling "nearly as much" or even "on a similar level" would get someone arguing about it. |
I didn't say a million was irrelevant, I said that the distinction between 1,000,000 and 999,999 is irrelevant. Every Nintendo home console has sold at the same order of magnitude, but is that relevant information?
The second point pretty much ties into my answer of the first. Just because your argument is technically correct doesn't mean it supports the point you're trying to make.
Yakuzaice said:
I didn't say a million was irrelevant, I said that the distinction between 1,000,000 and 999,999 is irrelevant. Every Nintendo home console has sold at the same order of magnitude, but is that relevant information? The second point pretty much ties into my answer of the first. Just because your argument is technically correct doesn't mean it supports the point you're trying to make. |
You're still misunderstanding what order of magnitude means, something is on the same order of magnitude as something else if it is within 1/10 and 10* that number.
My second point is me trying to explain that the point I was trying to make was not what you interpreted it to be. I was deliberately *not* saying the Wii version was selling as much as the HD versions and used a wider phrase because I didn't think anybody would feel the need to argue with. It is like saying that two teams are "in the same league", it's not saying that they are as good as the other but that they are within a certain range of them, because people understand that a team can be in the same league as another without being nearly as good.
A game I'm developing with some friends:
www.xnagg.com/zombieasteroids/publish.htm
It is largely a technical exercise but feedback is appreciated.
I'm sorry but, aren't those PS3 numbers kinda low ?
I mean, Sony just launched the 160 Go PS3 alongside the FIFA 320Go PS3 bundle the PES 320Go PS3 bundle, and the console went down 13% from last week ?
BTW, where's PES ?

I think the software race between PS3/360 is going to be the one to watch in the EMEAA this holiday. Not that anyone cares...
