By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Epic citadel on iphone 4 surpasses early 360 games graphicly

IMU1808 said:
tuscaniman said:

Its Leo-J so of course the title says "Looks better than early 360 games", even though we know if this is the case it looks better than early PS3 games as well. One look at Resistance:Fall of Man and you would realize this. If everyone remembers right the PS3 was behind the 360 graphically when it released and it played catch up, caught up, and eventually surpassed. Now the 360 will play catch up and at least equal with Gears of War 3.


If that's what you think then FINE, GREAT, SURE. Why the outcry for it to be mentioned? This is about TECH, not console graphics comparisons. Must some people be so over defensive about this stuff? It's like graphics is the only thing gamers care about these days...

Outcry because only the 360 was mentioned. To be fair it should have said early PS3, early 360 and all Wii games, but of course life isn't fair is it? Its a stealth troll attempt and everyone noticed it except the PS3 only owners and defenders.



Around the Network

Even Super Mario Galaxy looked better than 360's November 22, 2005 launch line-up. The best looking game for 360's launch was Call of Duty 2 and that's not saying much.



Snesboy said:

Even Super Mario Galaxy looked better than 360's November 22, 2005 launch line-up. The best looking game for 360's launch was Call of Duty 2 and that's not saying much.


Nice try but COD2 looks better than Mario Galaxy 2. Mario is a stylized game so while SMG looks good for a Mario game, its not technically or graphically impressive. The Wii is slightly more powerful than the original Xbox, if even that, so saying it can produce anything equal to the 360 is wrong. But if you want to get technical then SMG2 looks better than Sneak King so its beats the 360 in at least one game I can think of.



Kameo, PGR3 and Condemned: Criminal Origins were launch titles. Why do most think CoD2 was the best looking launch title for 360? I personally think those 3 look better.



A. beautiful looking game.

B. while i agree it looks better than early 360 games, kowenicki is right: only mentioning the 360 is a bit of a stealth troll.  don't know if it was intentional or not but lay off kowenicki cause he has a good point.

C. very beautiful.  i like.



Around the Network
nightsurge said:
IMU1808 said:
tuscaniman said:

Its Leo-J so of course the title says "Looks better than early 360 games", even though we know if this is the case it looks better than early PS3 games as well. One look at Resistance:Fall of Man and you would realize this. If everyone remembers right the PS3 was behind the 360 graphically when it released and it played catch up, caught up, and eventually surpassed. Now the 360 will play catch up and at least equal with Gears of War 3.


If that's what you think then FINE, GREAT, SURE. Why the outcry for it to be mentioned? This is about TECH, not console graphics comparisons. Must some people be so over defensive about this stuff? It's like graphics is the only thing gamers care about these days...

Sure seems to be about graphics, not tech.  No mention of tech anywhere in the OP or the title or the thread.

Even if it were about tech, why would he not mention the other console tech, or handheld tech?

Quit trying to sugar coat it.  We know the OP, Leo-J, and this is no surprise at all coming from him.


It surpassing current handhelds would mean next to squat. The original iPhone was doing that according to many industry figures. Regardless of past posting habits of Leo-J, the man said "EARLY 360". If more people focused on the word EARLY instead of just the console we would have a pretty nice thread discussion going on. 360 was the first 7th gen console released and over a year before PS3 and Wii. This phone doing things we didn't see on consoles until 2005. This thread could have been about tech but no... some posters gotta get bent up over the title because of their bias when Leo-J isn't really saying anything negative about consoles.



nightsurge said:
IMU1808 said:
tuscaniman said:

Its Leo-J so of course the title says "Looks better than early 360 games", even though we know if this is the case it looks better than early PS3 games as well. One look at Resistance:Fall of Man and you would realize this. If everyone remembers right the PS3 was behind the 360 graphically when it released and it played catch up, caught up, and eventually surpassed. Now the 360 will play catch up and at least equal with Gears of War 3.


If that's what you think then FINE, GREAT, SURE. Why the outcry for it to be mentioned? This is about TECH, not console graphics comparisons. Must some people be so over defensive about this stuff? It's like graphics is the only thing gamers care about these days...

Sure seems to be about graphics, not tech.  No mention of tech anywhere in the OP or the title or the thread.

Even if it were about tech, why would he not mention the other console tech, or handheld tech?

Quit trying to sugar coat it.  We know the OP, Leo-J, and this is no surprise at all coming from him.

I agree completely, every leo post I have seen seems to have a hint of being biased toward 360

but anyways, This looks great, Im amazed what phones can do now :-o



nightsurge said:
ConnorJCP said:

kowenick, is there something wrong?
Because your having a major cry over, him using xbox 360 in his thread title.
and this thread has nothing to do with ps3, or wii, so dont try and bring them into this.
Id say your trolling, not Doobie.

If it has nothing to do with the PS3 or Wii then it has nothing to do with the 360 either.

PS3 early games looked just as bad or worse than early 360 games.  All Wii games look worse than any PS3 or 360 game.

The OP is making a nice stealth troll attempt and since this site is majority PS3 fans it will go unnoticed and unpunished.

Thats so illogical, hes making a statement.
Thats like me saying "this tree grows faster then that tree."
Then you saying "no, if it grows faster then that tree it grows faster then this tree and this tree."
well done.....theres no need to bring things that have nothing to do with the thread, into the thread.
It doesn't matter what he said, hes getting a point across.



Smart Men answer questions, Wise men ask questions.
Gamers play games, True Gamers support Gaming

ConnorJCP said:
nightsurge said:
ConnorJCP said:

kowenick, is there something wrong?
Because your having a major cry over, him using xbox 360 in his thread title.
and this thread has nothing to do with ps3, or wii, so dont try and bring them into this.
Id say your trolling, not Doobie.

If it has nothing to do with the PS3 or Wii then it has nothing to do with the 360 either.

PS3 early games looked just as bad or worse than early 360 games.  All Wii games look worse than any PS3 or 360 game.

The OP is making a nice stealth troll attempt and since this site is majority PS3 fans it will go unnoticed and unpunished.

Thats so illogical, hes making a statement.
Thats like me saying "this tree grows faster then that tree."
Then you saying "no, if it grows faster then that tree it grows faster then this tree and this tree."
well done.....theres no need to bring things that have nothing to do with the thread, into the thread.
It doesn't matter what he said, hes getting a point across.

Couldn't have said it better with that line myself, yet Leo-J manages to bring in the 360...

I don't see why anyone bothers defending him.  If it were still the old VGC, you'd see that he is actually one of the most banned people on this site.  His VGC$ was more negative than his current VGC Points are positive.  I wish they would reincorporate the old points somehow to balance out the rubric so people like Leo-J don't look like VGC Gods.



tuscaniman said:
Snesboy said:

Even Super Mario Galaxy looked better than 360's November 22, 2005 launch line-up. The best looking game for 360's launch was Call of Duty 2 and that's not saying much.


Nice try but COD2 looks better than Mario Galaxy 2. Mario is a stylized game so while SMG looks good for a Mario game, its not technically or graphically impressive. The Wii is slightly more powerful than the original Xbox, if even that, so saying it can produce anything equal to the 360 is wrong. But if you want to get technical then SMG2 looks better than Sneak King so its beats the 360 in at least one game I can think of.

I said the first game! Not it's sequel :P CoD is crap anyways.