By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
IMU1808 on 07 October 2010
Edit Thread
nightsurge said:
IMU1808 said:
tuscaniman said:

Its Leo-J so of course the title says "Looks better than early 360 games", even though we know if this is the case it looks better than early PS3 games as well. One look at Resistance:Fall of Man and you would realize this. If everyone remembers right the PS3 was behind the 360 graphically when it released and it played catch up, caught up, and eventually surpassed. Now the 360 will play catch up and at least equal with Gears of War 3.


If that's what you think then FINE, GREAT, SURE. Why the outcry for it to be mentioned? This is about TECH, not console graphics comparisons. Must some people be so over defensive about this stuff? It's like graphics is the only thing gamers care about these days...

Sure seems to be about graphics, not tech.  No mention of tech anywhere in the OP or the title or the thread.

Even if it were about tech, why would he not mention the other console tech, or handheld tech?

Quit trying to sugar coat it.  We know the OP, Leo-J, and this is no surprise at all coming from him.


It surpassing current handhelds would mean next to squat. The original iPhone was doing that according to many industry figures. Regardless of past posting habits of Leo-J, the man said "EARLY 360". If more people focused on the word EARLY instead of just the console we would have a pretty nice thread discussion going on. 360 was the first 7th gen console released and over a year before PS3 and Wii. This phone doing things we didn't see on consoles until 2005. This thread could have been about tech but no... some posters gotta get bent up over the title because of their bias when Leo-J isn't really saying anything negative about consoles.