By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Nobel prize in physics won with sticky tape and graphite.

Source

Two-Dimensional Crystal Claims Physics Nobel

on 5 October 2010, 2:52 PM

This year's recipients of the Nobel Prize in physics earned that honor with the most wafer-thin of discoveries and with the help of some Scotch tape. Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov of the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom share the prize for their discovery in 2004 of graphene, a one-atom-thick material made of carbon. Only a few years later, the material promises revolutionary advances in electronics and other technologies. "My hope is that graphene ... will change our everyday lives the way plastics did," Geim says.

Graphene had humble beginnings. Geim and Novoselov first produced flakes of it by peeling them off a chunk of graphite using cellophane tape. "It just started as a Friday evening experiment," Novoselov recalls. "We were enjoying doing it." Others had been trying more complicated methods of liberating a single sheet of atoms, says Philip Kim, a physicist at Columbia University. "I was shocked that they were able to get a single layer with such a simple method," Kim says. "We were completely scooped."

Early on, graphene fascinated primarily theoretical physicists. Because of the material's two-dimensional nature, the electrons in it conspire to move as though they have no mass, much like particles of light. So just like photons, the electrons must always move, cruising along at their own specific "speed of light." All of this was predicted decades ago, but graphene provided the first example of such odd behavior.

Quickly, physicists, engineers, and chemists began to see the potential for applications. Graphene has many bizarre and often contradictory properties. For example, it is flexible like plastic but stronger than diamond, and it conducts electricity like a metal but is transparent like glass. Researchers have figured out how to make sheets measuring tens of centimeters across. They have developed methods to cut the sheets into nanometer-scale patterns and to change graphene's electrical properties by, for example, affixing hydrogen to its surface.

That's opened the way to scads of possible applications. The South Korean electronics company Samsung has developed a touch screen from graphene, whereas researchers with IBM have fashioned ultrafast transistors from the stuff. A sieve of graphene might also serve to sequence DNA. Even Novoselov says it's too early to say exactly what uses graphene will find. "Whatever I say now will be wrong because there has been so much progress in its properties and mass production," he says.

In that regard, this year's prize could be considered an anomaly. In the past, a few prizes have quickly spotlighted discoveries that upended the prevailing theory; others have recognized advances that over decades had led to ubiquitous applications. This year's prize, by contrast, honors physics that by all accounts is beautiful but not revolutionary. "You don't need a new theory" to understand graphene, says Jeroen van den Brink, a theorist at the Institute for Materials Sciences at the Dresden University of Technology in Germany. At the same time, it celebrates the potential for applications yet to come. "Will this really come into the market?" Kim says. "I think it's really difficult to say." Still, everyone interviewed by Science says Geim and Novoselov thoroughly deserve the prize.

The prize is also unusual because one recipient has another claim to fame. In 2000, Geim won a share of an Ig Nobel Prize, a satirical award given out by the publishers of the Annals of Improbable Research, for magnetically levitating a live frog. Geim is the first person to win both prizes. During a press conference announcing the Nobel Prize, Geim reacted with unusual candor to his latest award: "When I got the telephone call, I thought, 'Shit!' because it is a life-changing event."

 

 

I just thought that I'd make a thread on this year's nobel prize in physics. The winner's research? Creating a sheet of graphene, which is a one atom thick layer of graphite (the lead you would find in a pencil). This was amazing because in a time when physics research is associated with particle colliders and quantum computers, these two have won the nobel prize by taking a sheet of graphite and applying sticky tape to create a sheet of graphene, which is an incredibly useful and interesting material.

No doubt things are a lot more complex than I or the media are making it seem, but it's still quite an incredible way to win the nobel prize.



Around the Network

Interesting story, I'd heard of the substance but not the way it was discoverred.  I would assume that the graphene you produce with sticky tape and graphite isn't useable though since a speaker I saw said that graphene is the most expensive stuff per milligram in the world which would seem silly if you could make useable graphene with graphite and tape. 



...

Torillian said:

Interesting story, I'd heard of the substance but not the way it was discoverred.  I would assume that the graphene you produce with sticky tape and graphite isn't useable though since a speaker I saw said that graphene is the most expensive stuff per milligram in the world which would seem silly if you could make useable graphene with graphite and tape. 

Of course though graphene now isn't produced using tape because it would just be impractical like you say, this was just an experiment from 2004 that produced the first single sheet of graphene. The new processes that have been developed since are more expensive and complex, but they would need to be in order to produce a useable sheet.

Anyway, a sheet of graphene is incredibly light substance, I'm sure it does cost a lot per milligram, but a milligram sheet is a fair bit of graphene.



highwaystar101 said:
Torillian said:

Interesting story, I'd heard of the substance but not the way it was discoverred.  I would assume that the graphene you produce with sticky tape and graphite isn't useable though since a speaker I saw said that graphene is the most expensive stuff per milligram in the world which would seem silly if you could make useable graphene with graphite and tape. 

Of course though graphene now isn't produced using tape because it would just be impractical like you say, this was just an experiment from 2004 that produced the first single sheet of graphene. The new processes that have been developed since are more expensive and complex, but they would need to be in order to produce a useable sheet.

Anyway, a sheet of graphene is incredibly light substance, I'm sure it does cost a lot per milligram, but a milligram sheet is a fair bit of graphene.

well the speaker I saw had found a solvent that was able to dissolve graphite and produce graphene, but he didn't mention the standard methods.  He just talked alot about how much cheaper his method is but I'm not sure if you can get useable sheets out of it.  This was a year or so ago so I'm probably just not remembering everything correctly.



...

What would happen if you dropped it? Would you be able to see it to pick it up again?

What are the possibilites for medical science? Something that flexible and strong would be pretty useful I'd imagine.

Also, when can I buy a Mag-Lev frog??



Around the Network

commenting so I can read it after work in my posted threads list.



 

 

Geim also did this in his younger years:

crazy dutchmen :)



 

Face the future.. Gamecenter ID: nikkom_nl (oh no he didn't!!) 

So Nintendo either owns the rights to graphine or will be the world leaders  in it's production as graphine has a 2d nature and they are the 2d kings, i suspect this guys  name isn't Geim but Miyamoto, the levitating frog gave it away,



Research shows Video games  help make you smarter, so why am I an idiot