By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Dinosaurs co-existed with man.

dobby985 on 29 September 2010
zarx said:

sorry this was debunked, the supposed "flesh" was just bacterial bio-films that have formed in the microscopic cavities that formed by the cells during fossilisation, a mistake that has been made before.

http://bacteriality.com/2008/08/26/dino/

 The other videos from what I have seen are full of incorrect statements and bad science, sorry.


Oo Snap!

 



Around the Network
highwaystar101 on 29 September 2010
zarx said:
Joelcool7 said:

I'm not going to watch the video's as I fully believe they did co-exist. It's completely asanine not too.

I mean seriously if Dinasuars and humans never co-existed then why are their murals of DInasuars found in ancient cultures. Native American sculptures of Dinasuars, even the Axtec's and Myans had sculptures and pictures of dinasuars. Their is so much archeological evidence supporting the theory that dinasuars and humans co-existed it isn't even funny.

If dinasuars didn't co-exist with humans are you saying all these cultures simply made up perfect images of dinasuars? Did they telepathically go back in time to see them? Seriously its complete idiocy to think that humans and dinasuars never co-existed.

Just look if Evolutionists could say coelacanth died millions of years ago just to find them alive today, then how hard is it to suggest that maybe dinasuars and humans co-existed? Eventually more proof will come to light but for now the archeological evidence is hugely in the favour of dinasuars existing alongside humans!

I am going to assume you are being serious.

I drew a picture of a dinosaur the other day there must be dinosaurs running around RIGHT now. Seriously cave drawings weren't exactly accurate, and often depicted exaggerated scenes. And mythological scenes. I suppose there were also aliens, men bigger than dear and mammoths, gods, and creatures like hydras, fire breathing dragons, snakes that wrapped all the way around the world and ate it's self? Because all of these things have been depicted in ancient art. 

here are some examples

not exactly photographs

There is next to no real evidence suggesting humans and dinosaurs co-existing, there is on the other hand an overwhelming amount of evidence they were wiped out 65 million years ago. "Evolutionists" said that coelacanth died out because there was no evidence that they hadn't died out. there was no evidence that they were still alive, they are not common and we no far less about the depths of the oceans than we do about space. Dinosaurs are far harder to miss than a fish. It is possible that there were more alligators , commodo dragons and giraffes. 

 

I just had a quick search too. I'm not sure what he was talking about either as I could find no reputable evidence that Aztecs or Mayans ever painted anything like a dinosaur, barely even a photo of a painting. The only thing I could find for the Native Americans painting a "dinosaur" was this sketch...

Hardly compelling evidence is it? A circle with three lines. It could literally be anything. There is absolutely no certainty that this is a dinosaur. In fact I think it looks pretty similar to a flying spaghetti monster (I kid, I kid).



zarx on 29 September 2010
highwaystar101 said:
zarx said:
Joelcool7 said:

I'm not going to watch the video's as I fully believe they did co-exist. It's completely asanine not too.

I mean seriously if Dinasuars and humans never co-existed then why are their murals of DInasuars found in ancient cultures. Native American sculptures of Dinasuars, even the Axtec's and Myans had sculptures and pictures of dinasuars. Their is so much archeological evidence supporting the theory that dinasuars and humans co-existed it isn't even funny.

If dinasuars didn't co-exist with humans are you saying all these cultures simply made up perfect images of dinasuars? Did they telepathically go back in time to see them? Seriously its complete idiocy to think that humans and dinasuars never co-existed.

Just look if Evolutionists could say coelacanth died millions of years ago just to find them alive today, then how hard is it to suggest that maybe dinasuars and humans co-existed? Eventually more proof will come to light but for now the archeological evidence is hugely in the favour of dinasuars existing alongside humans!

I am going to assume you are being serious.

I drew a picture of a dinosaur the other day there must be dinosaurs running around RIGHT now. Seriously cave drawings weren't exactly accurate, and often depicted exaggerated scenes. And mythological scenes. I suppose there were also aliens, men bigger than dear and mammoths, gods, and creatures like hydras, fire breathing dragons, snakes that wrapped all the way around the world and ate it's self? Because all of these things have been depicted in ancient art. 

here are some examples

not exactly photographs

There is next to no real evidence suggesting humans and dinosaurs co-existing, there is on the other hand an overwhelming amount of evidence they were wiped out 65 million years ago. "Evolutionists" said that coelacanth died out because there was no evidence that they hadn't died out. there was no evidence that they were still alive, they are not common and we no far less about the depths of the oceans than we do about space. Dinosaurs are far harder to miss than a fish. It is possible that there were more alligators , commodo dragons and giraffes. 

 

I just had a quick search too. I'm not sure what he was talking about either as I could find no reputable evidence that Aztecs or Mayans ever painted anything like a dinosaur, barely even a photo of a painting. The only thing I could find for the Native Americans painting a "dinosaur" was this sketch...

Hardly compelling evidence is it? A circle with three lines. It could literally be anything. There is absolutely no certainty that this is a dinosaur. In fact I think it looks pretty similar to a flying spaghetti monster (I kid, I kid).

OMG I have been converted, I now believe that dinosaurs ruled men like kings with their mighty powers. This depiction of a man tied to a post is irrefutable evidence of their rule.



@TheVoxelman on twitter

Check out my hype threads: Cyberpunk, and The Witcher 3!

Cobretti2 on 29 September 2010

I thought this was common knowledge? I guess there was no proof before?



 

 

greenmedic88 on 29 September 2010
zarx said:
highwaystar101 said:
zarx said:
Joelcool7 said:

I'm not going to watch the video's as I fully believe they did co-exist. It's completely asanine not too.

I mean seriously if Dinasuars and humans never co-existed then why are their murals of DInasuars found in ancient cultures. Native American sculptures of Dinasuars, even the Axtec's and Myans had sculptures and pictures of dinasuars. Their is so much archeological evidence supporting the theory that dinasuars and humans co-existed it isn't even funny.

If dinasuars didn't co-exist with humans are you saying all these cultures simply made up perfect images of dinasuars? Did they telepathically go back in time to see them? Seriously its complete idiocy to think that humans and dinasuars never co-existed.

Just look if Evolutionists could say coelacanth died millions of years ago just to find them alive today, then how hard is it to suggest that maybe dinasuars and humans co-existed? Eventually more proof will come to light but for now the archeological evidence is hugely in the favour of dinasuars existing alongside humans!

I am going to assume you are being serious.

I drew a picture of a dinosaur the other day there must be dinosaurs running around RIGHT now. Seriously cave drawings weren't exactly accurate, and often depicted exaggerated scenes. And mythological scenes. I suppose there were also aliens, men bigger than dear and mammoths, gods, and creatures like hydras, fire breathing dragons, snakes that wrapped all the way around the world and ate it's self? Because all of these things have been depicted in ancient art. 

here are some examples

not exactly photographs

There is next to no real evidence suggesting humans and dinosaurs co-existing, there is on the other hand an overwhelming amount of evidence they were wiped out 65 million years ago. "Evolutionists" said that coelacanth died out because there was no evidence that they hadn't died out. there was no evidence that they were still alive, they are not common and we no far less about the depths of the oceans than we do about space. Dinosaurs are far harder to miss than a fish. It is possible that there were more alligators , commodo dragons and giraffes. 

 

I just had a quick search too. I'm not sure what he was talking about either as I could find no reputable evidence that Aztecs or Mayans ever painted anything like a dinosaur, barely even a photo of a painting. The only thing I could find for the Native Americans painting a "dinosaur" was this sketch...

Hardly compelling evidence is it? A circle with three lines. It could literally be anything. There is absolutely no certainty that this is a dinosaur. In fact I think it looks pretty similar to a flying spaghetti monster (I kid, I kid).

OMG I have been converted, I now believe that dinosaurs ruled men like kings with their mighty powers. This depiction of a man tied to a post is irrefutable evidence of their rule.

Hey, if you need a religious conversion, I have two words for you: Raptor Jesus.

Believe.



Around the Network
zarx on 29 September 2010
greenmedic88 said:
zarx said:
highwaystar101 said:
zarx said:
Joelcool7 said:

I'm not going to watch the video's as I fully believe they did co-exist. It's completely asanine not too.

I mean seriously if Dinasuars and humans never co-existed then why are their murals of DInasuars found in ancient cultures. Native American sculptures of Dinasuars, even the Axtec's and Myans had sculptures and pictures of dinasuars. Their is so much archeological evidence supporting the theory that dinasuars and humans co-existed it isn't even funny.

If dinasuars didn't co-exist with humans are you saying all these cultures simply made up perfect images of dinasuars? Did they telepathically go back in time to see them? Seriously its complete idiocy to think that humans and dinasuars never co-existed.

Just look if Evolutionists could say coelacanth died millions of years ago just to find them alive today, then how hard is it to suggest that maybe dinasuars and humans co-existed? Eventually more proof will come to light but for now the archeological evidence is hugely in the favour of dinasuars existing alongside humans!

I am going to assume you are being serious.

I drew a picture of a dinosaur the other day there must be dinosaurs running around RIGHT now. Seriously cave drawings weren't exactly accurate, and often depicted exaggerated scenes. And mythological scenes. I suppose there were also aliens, men bigger than dear and mammoths, gods, and creatures like hydras, fire breathing dragons, snakes that wrapped all the way around the world and ate it's self? Because all of these things have been depicted in ancient art. 

here are some examples

not exactly photographs

There is next to no real evidence suggesting humans and dinosaurs co-existing, there is on the other hand an overwhelming amount of evidence they were wiped out 65 million years ago. "Evolutionists" said that coelacanth died out because there was no evidence that they hadn't died out. there was no evidence that they were still alive, they are not common and we no far less about the depths of the oceans than we do about space. Dinosaurs are far harder to miss than a fish. It is possible that there were more alligators , commodo dragons and giraffes. 

 

I just had a quick search too. I'm not sure what he was talking about either as I could find no reputable evidence that Aztecs or Mayans ever painted anything like a dinosaur, barely even a photo of a painting. The only thing I could find for the Native Americans painting a "dinosaur" was this sketch...

Hardly compelling evidence is it? A circle with three lines. It could literally be anything. There is absolutely no certainty that this is a dinosaur. In fact I think it looks pretty similar to a flying spaghetti monster (I kid, I kid).

OMG I have been converted, I now believe that dinosaurs ruled men like kings with their mighty powers. This depiction of a man tied to a post is irrefutable evidence of their rule.

Hey, if you need a religious conversion, I have two words for you: Raptor Jesus.

Believe.


who cares about dinosaur overlords when we have Raptor Jesus, all hail our lord and saviour.  



@TheVoxelman on twitter

Check out my hype threads: Cyberpunk, and The Witcher 3!

rocketpig on 29 September 2010
numonex said:

Some religious nuts believe the world 6,000 year old and they believe in the Creationism of the Bible just like  Sarah Palin and religious cults/sects. Palin believes the world is only 6,000 years old and was created by God. 

The Bible is fairy tales for children. No way is Creationism or a big guy in the sky created the world and universe. Physicists and other science experts have proven that science created the world and the universe more than 4 billion years ago. 

Modern man has only been alive for 70,000 years originate from Africa and migrating to all the continent of the world over time. Man evolved from chimpanzees and Darwin's theory of Evolution proves that life on this planet has slowly evolved and changed over billions of years. The Dinosaurs were extinct 65 million years ago due to a meteorite wiping them out. 65 million year gap between the arrival of man and the extinction of the Dinosaurs. Carbon dating of fossils show the dinosaurs have been dead for 65 million years .  

40,000 years ago the last of the giant mammals: woolly mammoths, sabre tooth tigers became extinct. Lizards, alligators and crocodiles closely resembling dinosaurs are still thriving: unchanged for millions of years. 

1. No scientist on the planet seriously believes man evolved from chimpanzees.

2. There are still giant mammals on the planet. They're called elephants, rhinos, and, you know... whales.

3. The universe is way older than four billion years. Our sun is older than that.

4. You should really stop making stuff up.




Or check out my new webcomic: http://selfcentent.com/

tyig on 29 September 2010

Hey I can draw some anime robots, does that mean they exist? Yeah, absolutely.

Seriously, I can't believe one can support an argument like this.



But war... war never changes

Armads on 29 September 2010

I'm sorry but I had to stop watching once I heard  "Finally we will examine one of the most accurate and trusted historical records known to man: The Bible" because I started shooting milk from my nose from an outburst of laughter. 

pizzahut451 said:

Well, i dont believe God created Earth, i believe he created the universe, so im not a creatonist i guess. But i sure as hell dont believe in a a bullshit, retarded made up theory known as Big Bang

Why wouldn't you believe in the big bang?  It's supported by tons of evidence and it doesn't even necessarily conflict with the worldview of a god-created universe.  If there can be a god in your mind, that god can start the universe with a bang I'm sure.



superchunk on 29 September 2010

This is just a poorly derived hypothesis.

The dating of fossils is a nearly perfect tool and just because you can soak some fossil in acid to get its fossilized tissues to be sorta fresh again does not detract from the fact that dinos as we commonly think of them lived millions of years before Homo Sapiens evolved.

btw, evolution and God can coexist. Its just narrow mindedness that thinks they contradict each other. The Qur'an actually describes that man was created in an evolutionary way. I don't have the direct quote in front of me, but I can search for it if you like. Hell, most Muslims would argue against me on this one, but its because they fail to actually read their Qur'an and just follow like sheep to what some other ass is saying.