By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
highwaystar101 on 29 September 2010
Edit Thread
zarx said:
Joelcool7 said:

I'm not going to watch the video's as I fully believe they did co-exist. It's completely asanine not too.

I mean seriously if Dinasuars and humans never co-existed then why are their murals of DInasuars found in ancient cultures. Native American sculptures of Dinasuars, even the Axtec's and Myans had sculptures and pictures of dinasuars. Their is so much archeological evidence supporting the theory that dinasuars and humans co-existed it isn't even funny.

If dinasuars didn't co-exist with humans are you saying all these cultures simply made up perfect images of dinasuars? Did they telepathically go back in time to see them? Seriously its complete idiocy to think that humans and dinasuars never co-existed.

Just look if Evolutionists could say coelacanth died millions of years ago just to find them alive today, then how hard is it to suggest that maybe dinasuars and humans co-existed? Eventually more proof will come to light but for now the archeological evidence is hugely in the favour of dinasuars existing alongside humans!

I am going to assume you are being serious.

I drew a picture of a dinosaur the other day there must be dinosaurs running around RIGHT now. Seriously cave drawings weren't exactly accurate, and often depicted exaggerated scenes. And mythological scenes. I suppose there were also aliens, men bigger than dear and mammoths, gods, and creatures like hydras, fire breathing dragons, snakes that wrapped all the way around the world and ate it's self? Because all of these things have been depicted in ancient art. 

here are some examples

not exactly photographs

There is next to no real evidence suggesting humans and dinosaurs co-existing, there is on the other hand an overwhelming amount of evidence they were wiped out 65 million years ago. "Evolutionists" said that coelacanth died out because there was no evidence that they hadn't died out. there was no evidence that they were still alive, they are not common and we no far less about the depths of the oceans than we do about space. Dinosaurs are far harder to miss than a fish. It is possible that there were more alligators , commodo dragons and giraffes. 

 

I just had a quick search too. I'm not sure what he was talking about either as I could find no reputable evidence that Aztecs or Mayans ever painted anything like a dinosaur, barely even a photo of a painting. The only thing I could find for the Native Americans painting a "dinosaur" was this sketch...

Hardly compelling evidence is it? A circle with three lines. It could literally be anything. There is absolutely no certainty that this is a dinosaur. In fact I think it looks pretty similar to a flying spaghetti monster (I kid, I kid).