By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Poll: 72% of Adults Support Violent Game Law

amp316 said:

I am against this law.

I think that grade schoolers should be able to watch pornography as well.


They can its called the internet. I have been told in lectures that the average range kids see porn is between 9-11.

On topic, I still get carded for mature games even though I'm 26. So it's a stupid law because people are already enforcing the rarting systems.



Around the Network
TheConduit said:

72 percent of adults show they would support a law that would prohibit the sale of "ultraviolent or sexually violent" videogames to minors without parental consent.

What do you think

 


I'm thinking they weren't told the video game industry already has one of the best self regulated rating systems in place and just flat out asked if games should be rated or whatever without any other information



TukTuk said:
TheConduit said:

72 percent of adults show they would support a law that would prohibit the sale of "ultraviolent or sexually violent" videogames to minors without parental consent.

What do you think

 


I'm thinking they weren't told the video game industry already has one of the best self regulated rating systems in place and just flat out asked if games should be rated or whatever without any other information

I wonder how total lack of AO rated games is good self-regulation... And what we could do to fix that problem. As a non-American, I find it difficult to find a difference between this new "law" and the old AO rating. So, are you all also against having an AO rating?

Also, what about porn? How is it any worse than violence? I'm sure you've had to counter this argument several times already but I haven't been lucky enough to see it even once.



Zkuq said:
TukTuk said:
TheConduit said:

72 percent of adults show they would support a law that would prohibit the sale of "ultraviolent or sexually violent" videogames to minors without parental consent.

What do you think

 


I'm thinking they weren't told the video game industry already has one of the best self regulated rating systems in place and just flat out asked if games should be rated or whatever without any other information

I wonder how total lack of AO rated games is good self-regulation... And what we could do to fix that problem. As a non-American, I find it difficult to find a difference between this new "law" and the old AO rating. So, are you all also against having an AO rating?

Also, what about porn? How is it any worse than violence? I'm sure you've had to counter this argument several times already but I haven't been lucky enough to see it even once.

I'm sure a publisher could make an AO game if they want to but since it's really hard to sell an AO game they just choose not to make AO games.  I doubt the rating process is like Apple's app store where it's surprise if you make it or not, I'm sure the devs know what rating they're shooting for.

It's not really the ESRB's fault that AO games plain don't sell so publishers plain dont' want to make them.



Considering how the US already has this in effect my advice to these parents is this.

 

Pay attention to what your kids are doing and stop buying them M rated titles.



iPhone = Great gaming device. Don't agree? Who cares, because you're wrong.

Currently playing:

Final Fantasy VI (iOS), Final Fantasy: Record Keeper (iOS) & Dragon Quest V (iOS)     

    

Got a retro room? Post it here!

Around the Network

Link?



The BuShA owns all!

Killiana1a said:
indodude said:

lolwut? I thought this "law" was already enforced.

Funny, 8 years back I was in Hollywood Video renting a PS2 game. An 8 year old picks out GTA: Vice City and his fucked up, completely negligent parent allows his 8 year old to rent it.

I was thinking what the fuck? When I was 8, I was playing Super Mario Bros 3 and did not play my first mature game until Doom when I was around age 12.

If we have parents like this, then companies need to be held to the table. Fines and whatnot equivalent to liquor and convenient stores selling alcohol and tobacco to minors is needed because there are parents out there who will let little Jimmy rent any game because they just don't care.


I don't know if you're directly replying to me, but if you are, I guess you didn't read the OP because you even said that the kid's parents allowed him to rent the game.



chocoloco said:
amp316 said:

I am against this law.

I think that grade schoolers should be able to watch pornography as well.


They can its called the internet. I have been told in lectures that the average range kids see porn is between 9-11.

On topic, I still get carded for mature games even though I'm 26. So it's a stupid law because people are already enforcing the rarting systems.

So...

By your way of thinking, a kid should be able to go into a porn theater since they can watch it on the net, right?  

Let's sell them cigarettes, alcohol, guns, and let them drive too.  What the heck?

I'm sorry, but there are some guidelines that are needed.  About being carded, that's not a big deal.  Several places card for alcohol or cigarettes if you look under 30 in order to be safe.



Proud member of the SONIC SUPPORT SQUAD

Tag "Sorry man. Someone pissed in my Wheaties."

"There are like ten games a year that sell over a million units."  High Voltage CEO -  Eric Nofsinger

Now that I'm over 18... 



 

 

 

 

 

amp316 said:
chocoloco said:
amp316 said:

I am against this law.

I think that grade schoolers should be able to watch pornography as well.


They can its called the internet. I have been told in lectures that the average range kids see porn is between 9-11.

On topic, I still get carded for mature games even though I'm 26. So it's a stupid law because people are already enforcing the rarting systems.

So...

By your way of thinking, a kid should be able to go into a porn theater since they can watch it on the net, right?  

Let's sell them cigarettes, alcohol, guns, and let them drive too.  What the heck?

I'm sorry, but there are some guidelines that are needed.  About being carded, that's not a big deal.  Several places card for alcohol or cigarettes if you look under 30 in order to be safe.

If you can't enforce a law at all say like internet usage why make the law at all. It should be left up to responsible adults to make choices for themselves and there families.

Underage drinking is sky high, ciggerate smoking usually starts in the teens, guns lead to death so they shouldn;t be compared to games. Oh and marijuana and illicit drug usage continues no matter what kind of sanctions the government makes. Why waste time making laws about games. They are not changing anything other than saying this is our principle so stick to it citizens. Yet the laws have little positive effect.

I don't think being carded is a big deal just an annoyance, I was actually using that point to say the gaming business is already regulating the sale of mature games to children.