you should go do that in the pre order charts, their are going to be meltdowns.

Have you even played Risen?  I have on 360 and it's pretty damn addictive.

I don't even know where those are (never saw them before)!  But I'll do it!!

have you played dead to rights retrebution?

point is ms needs more 1st party studios. nuff said.

you are officialy on the anti meltdown committee, you have to prevent meltdowns 3 times a week(depending on anouncements). the sanity in this forum depends on you! 

you are officialy on the anti-meltdown committee, you are required to prevent meltdowns 3 times a week, accept at e3 week, gamescom week, and tgs week.

now take your badge, and your weekly salary of 100 vgchartz points.

the sanity in this forum is in your hands.

may the force be with you. 

ps: their is a possibility of a raise.

I hope you're right because if Microsoft pulls a 2010 E3 Nintendo-type conference with 2011 exclusives the same year they are announced then we're back in business. I dunno though.

Most of those are TBA and most likely will be pushed back. 2011 is a hopeful date for XCOM. Gears in the only true title with a projected date.

The better question is why do 360 owners care?  As long as they have the top 2 (Halo, COD) games in the top genre (shooter), everything else becomes second rate or a waste of time.  Really, who's going to stop playing those to play KZ or anything else from the long list of wannabe Halo/COD killers?  The playercount numbers and sales speak for itself.

I know this is off topic, but given S.T.A.G.E. has often been fairly pro 360 and clearly likes the console why is he getting so much bashing for simply stating he's a little concerned about the currently known exclusives it'll receive in 2011?

His point is fair and at this time the known titles that are 100% 360 exclusive are very thin on the ground and there aren't even that many notable 360/PC exclusives at this point.

With Valve now commiting themselves to releasing on PS3, and Mass Effect franchise going multi-platform his concerns on exclusive support seem fair enough and he only asked whether others agreed wtih him or not - not to be attacked.

In a few months things might change, lot's of exclusives might be revealed, but right now his concern seems fair to me and I don't know why so many are responding as if he's launching some sort of stealth attack on the 360 because, at least IMHO, he's clearly not.

I'd say right now most new titles being shown or pushed are Kinect focused, we all know MS has less 1st party development capabilty than Nintendo or Sony and a number of former key 360/PC franchises developers are now going fully multiplatform (Valve and Bioware).

If you're not interested in Kinect - which he doesn't seem to be - I think it's fair to wonder whether you're going to get a few exclusives you might be interested in or whether you're going to get more than that.

As I noted I don't think having less exclusives will actually harm the 360 at this point - but that doesn't seem to be his focus, simply that he's worried that while he'll of course get all the big multi-platform titles as well as the key exclusives (Halo, Gears) there's not much else unique he can see on the horizon at this point.