I doubt it. The PS3 version did have shorter loading times and better textures, but at the cost of framerate. If I had to guess, they were ported from PC.

Hummm....

Final Fantasy XIII (PS3): 5M*

Final Fantasy XIII (360): 1.5M*

* Guess numbers (I didn't check).

So what the point??? Some games sold better on 360 and other on PS3.

If it makes you feel better about the PS3, try this

Fifa 10 (360) 2.64 million

Fifa 10 (PS3) 3.42 million

Or this

PES 2010 (360) 0.77 million

PES 2010 (PS3) 2.20 million

or maybe this

Batman Arkham Asylum (360) 1.51 million

Batman Arkham Asylum (PS3) 1.96 million

If you read the review of the game on the site, I think youll find that your right

80 PS3 disc games & 50 PSN games

Yeah I dont think I am the problem

If more games were released on it that I want and aren't better or the same on the 360 I would gladly buy more games for my PS3.  It's just:

• Multiplatform games are generally (not always) better on the 360
• I prefer achievements
• I prefer the 360 controller (unless it's a D-Pad heavy game)
• I have more Live friends than PSN friends

It's as simple as that for me.

I believe the only multiplatform PS3 games I have are Batman: AA because of the free DLC, Dead Space because I wanted something with trophies, and FFXIII because it was petter on the PS3.  Other than, things like Red Dead I got on the 360 because my friends had it on the 360, things like Bayonetta were simply better on the 360, or things like Bioshock 2 I just wanted achievements more than trophies.

Amen to that brother. 

Borderlands is another good example. But no worries, that game was utterly bad anyways.

Because this site is Xbox biased!

Oh no you didn't. Sending virtual bitch slap.

Also I can say I choose to buy this game for the 360 because it was all about social gaming and most North American Gamers own the 360. Similar answer to why most of the games that have been mentioned have sold more for the 360.