By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Mafia Round 19 - Game Thread

theprof00 on 20 August 2010
c03n3nj0 said:

That was a great find. I read that before but roleblocker didn't pop into my mind. 

Now that we know the stories actually give clues as to what happened during the night (poseidon) we shouldn't ignore this roleblocker. 

Although, there's still the difference between the blocker being pro-town or anti-town. 

EDIT - I just made a sad realizing I said exactly what TruckO said.  

Read more of my posts. 

Basically, it's either their role blocker, or ours, and either way, both sides could have one. 

It seems like the situation is like a capture the flag (the flag in this case being a serial killer). It would be hard to imagine if both sides didn't have similar abilities.



Around the Network
SciFiBoy2.0 on 20 August 2010
theprof00 said:

explain why it doesn't make any sense.


@ me?

I posted a number of posts yesterday that challenged what other people where saying, I had several conversations with Hatmoza as im not convinced about his "plans", I also posted my thoughts on other stuff too!

heck, ive been way more active than several players, yet for some reason, TheRepublic has focused entirely on me so far, with the addition of ignoring any of my posts that challenge his view of me, plus you can now add his "lynch all liars" post, which seems designed soley to throw suspicion on you (imo you dont seem like scum, infact you seem to be helping the town), its also daft as I believe you already addressed those posts earlier in the game.



theRepublic on 20 August 2010

Finally through the 200 posts I came back to.  For those asking where I was, mainly SciFIBoy, I posted at the beginning of the game that I would only be posting between about 6 and midnight Central Time Monday through Friday.

My thoughts: Hatmoza should cure Hephaestos tonight.  Hephaestos should receive protection tonight.

Top Suspects (no particular order):

Squilliam (playing the newb card a lot as pointed out by Noname)
SciFiBoy (his brief reappearance didn't do much to alleviate my suspicions)
Supermario (due to absenteeism)
Nen-suer (I can't remember anything he has done this game off the top of my head.  Either he is lowing low, or maybe I have a bad memory.)



Switch Code: SW-7377-9189-3397 -- Nintendo Network ID: theRepublic -- Steam ID: theRepublic

Now Playing
Switch - Super Mario Maker 2 (2019)
Switch - The Legend of Zelda: Link's Awakening (2019)
Switch - Bastion (2011/2018)
3DS - Star Fox 64 3D (2011)
3DS - Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney (Trilogy) (2005/2014)
Wii U - Darksiders: Warmastered Edition (2010/2017)
Mobile - The Simpson's Tapped Out and Yugioh Duel Links
PC - Deep Rock Galactic (2020)

theRepublic on 20 August 2010

Lol, that was supposed to say 200'plus' posts.  Actually I think it was 250'plus'.



Switch Code: SW-7377-9189-3397 -- Nintendo Network ID: theRepublic -- Steam ID: theRepublic

Now Playing
Switch - Super Mario Maker 2 (2019)
Switch - The Legend of Zelda: Link's Awakening (2019)
Switch - Bastion (2011/2018)
3DS - Star Fox 64 3D (2011)
3DS - Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney (Trilogy) (2005/2014)
Wii U - Darksiders: Warmastered Edition (2010/2017)
Mobile - The Simpson's Tapped Out and Yugioh Duel Links
PC - Deep Rock Galactic (2020)

SciFiBoy2.0 on 20 August 2010
sabby_e17 said:
TruckOSaurus said:
hatmoza said:
TruckOSaurus said:
Vetteman94 said:

How is his elaborate theory any better than the other that has been laid out in his opposition?  

Hell I'll play the speculation game for a minute here.  It seems the Gods are pro-town,  its probably a bad assumption but i think its true at least some of them are,  so why and how would he be able to turn a character to aid the very people Kratos seeks for revenge?  And he claims to be someone who also plots against those very Gods


Posting from work, I haven't read to whole thread yet but there was something in this post I wanted to go back on before I forget.

In this post Vetteman is saying "It seems the Gods are pro-town", why would he have to make this an assumption? ANSWER: He's not a God (or he's a dissident God) and he's trying to figure out who the "pro-towns" are so he can like he's one of them. Add to that his jumpy behavior after hatmoza's defense and he's earned my vote.

Vote: Vetteman94

I agree with this.

However, read the above posts and convince us you're not the Kratos. And if you are, maybe we can arrange for you to be a vigilante still!

I personally want it to be Heph >:[ I'll have so much pleasure in lynching him

Sorry to quote myself yet again but nobody except hatmoza commented on this information I dug up on Vetteman. Since j0 asked for people we suspect most, I thought I'd bring it up again.

I'd like to know what everyone thinks of it? Especially Vetteman of course.

Vote: Vetteman94


I've been suspecting Vetteman, Silver-tiger and SciFiBoy for a long time because of them voting Hatmoza based on other players analysis. It was almost like they were bandwagoning on Hatmoza when some other guy dishes out some "evidence". They completely ignore Hatmoza's role-claim and why it would be a very risky thing to do (lynch him). Not only that, but they're ready to unvote Hatmoza when there's some other guy's analyisis on why Hatmoza shouldn't be lynched.

I dont recall voting for Hatmoza...

and I never ignored his role claim...I queried some of his activities, and I even brought up the risk of lynching him myself earlier today...why do you and TheRepublic happen to have the same selective memories? and why are you posting this now, so conviently just after I challenged TheRepublic and his suspicion of me?



Around the Network
c03n3nj0 on 20 August 2010
theprof00 said:
c03n3nj0 said:

That was a great find. I read that before but roleblocker didn't pop into my mind. 

Now that we know the stories actually give clues as to what happened during the night (poseidon) we shouldn't ignore this roleblocker. 

Although, there's still the difference between the blocker being pro-town or anti-town. 

EDIT - I just made a sad realizing I said exactly what TruckO said.  

Read more of my posts. 

Basically, it's either their role blocker, or ours, and either way, both sides could have one. 

It seems like the situation is like a capture the flag (the flag in this case being a serial killer). It would be hard to imagine if both sides didn't have similar abilities.

A lot of times both sides don't have similar abilities.



 Tag (Courtesy of Fkusumot) "If I'm posting in this thread then it's probally a spam thread."                               

theRepublic on 20 August 2010
SciFiBoy2.0 said:

heck, ive been way more active than several players, yet for some reason, TheRepublic has focused entirely on me so far, with the addition of ignoring any of my posts that challenge his view of me, plus you can now add his "lynch all liars" post, which seems designed soley to throw suspicion on you (imo you dont seem like scum, infact you seem to be helping the town), its also daft as I believe you already addressed those posts earlier in the game.

Theprof is the biggest distraction the town has right now in my eyes.  Unfortunately, he is apparently lynch-proof.



Switch Code: SW-7377-9189-3397 -- Nintendo Network ID: theRepublic -- Steam ID: theRepublic

Now Playing
Switch - Super Mario Maker 2 (2019)
Switch - The Legend of Zelda: Link's Awakening (2019)
Switch - Bastion (2011/2018)
3DS - Star Fox 64 3D (2011)
3DS - Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney (Trilogy) (2005/2014)
Wii U - Darksiders: Warmastered Edition (2010/2017)
Mobile - The Simpson's Tapped Out and Yugioh Duel Links
PC - Deep Rock Galactic (2020)

SciFiBoy2.0 on 20 August 2010
theRepublic said:

Finally through the 200 posts I came back to.  For those asking where I was, mainly SciFIBoy, I posted at the beginning of the game that I would only be posting between about 6 and midnight Central Time Monday through Friday.

My thoughts: Hatmoza should cure Hephaestos tonight.  Hephaestos should receive protection tonight.

Top Suspects (no particular order):

Squilliam (playing the newb card a lot as pointed out by Noname)
SciFiBoy (his brief reappearance didn't do much to alleviate my suspicions)
Supermario (due to absenteeism)
Nen-suer (I can't remember anything he has done this game off the top of my head.  Either he is lowing low, or maybe I have a bad memory.)

brief reaperance?

ive posted several times today at different points when ive been online, and ive posted more than you!

and you continue to ignore any points I put to you...



theRepublic on 20 August 2010

Does everyone notice how I am looking at many different players, yet SciFiBoy's sole focus seems to be on me?  He has ONE vote against him.  Overreact much?  Not to mention tunnel vision is a scum trait.



Switch Code: SW-7377-9189-3397 -- Nintendo Network ID: theRepublic -- Steam ID: theRepublic

Now Playing
Switch - Super Mario Maker 2 (2019)
Switch - The Legend of Zelda: Link's Awakening (2019)
Switch - Bastion (2011/2018)
3DS - Star Fox 64 3D (2011)
3DS - Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney (Trilogy) (2005/2014)
Wii U - Darksiders: Warmastered Edition (2010/2017)
Mobile - The Simpson's Tapped Out and Yugioh Duel Links
PC - Deep Rock Galactic (2020)

theprof00 on 20 August 2010
dtewi said:
theprof00 said:

I don't know, but saying that you were resolute in your judgement is not proof of innocence. 

Voting for someone like that, especially in a combo of other people voting is a scummy thing to do. Saying that you would have done it regardless shows that you are either reckless or a mafia. Nikells did nothing wrong, and we may have outed a key member because of how the voting was going.

It doesn't matter if you would or would not have changed your mind dtewi. The vote was wrong.

The distraction comes in like this. You're spending all your argument telling me how resolute you would have bee, because I'm challenging your resolve. In return you are getting aggressively adamant about a decision/course of action that was baseless, and extremely speculative, with more cons than pros and rapidly escalating to a boiling point that would have been a better outcome for the mafia.

You do realize that you've been talking out of your ass for your past 20 posts or so?

If it's not proof of my innocence, and therefore it wouldn't prove me not innocent, you had no point in bringing it up.

Nikells did do something wrong: he responded to suspicions of him with scummy behavior e.g. he has a powerful role and that we'd regret our decision! Many scum use this, and it wasn't baseless. 

The reason I'm getting angry is because you're infuriating!

You can't even admit that it was the wrong thing to do. Voting nikells was a stab in the dark, it really was.

Besides, Hat already knew who the SK was, he was gunning for heph in all his posts. We didn't need to risk a false lynch. It was wrong, and you can't admit that you jumped onto the bandwagon so hard and fast that it was irrational and scummy. Instead, you try and prove how determined you were to bandwagon. 

whatevs, you don't see why this is suspect behavior, but why would you, you're 100% sure that Nikells isn't on your team. You're also 100% sure that mafia doesn't have a hitman, and I'd bet, 100% sure that names and alignment are linked.

Don't you think it's odd that dtewi is so sure about everything, even things that aren't backed up with fact and rather a stereotypical attitude? All mafia say it's a mistake before they get lynched, right?