The doctor didn't know whom to protect on Night 1 and Final-Fan died because he wasn't protected.

But if revived, the doctor would have protected him.

In short, there was no reason to not revive him.

We did not know there was a bus driver day 2 nor do we know if there is a deputy here on day 3.

So no, there still was no reason.

And what's strange is he keeps adding conditions.

They die at the end of 1 day and they can only make two posts. Those conditions make no sense.

And even if those are true, he would have revived patapon, a daytime vigilante.

Why didn't you revive patapon sm128? Hmm?

Going to bed.

I'm sure I'll have at least 150 post to read tomorrow evening.  Especially with all the crazy shit that just went down.

wishfull thinking, I had 200 and that was between 5AM and 9 AM.... you're more likely to have 500... unless there's a night.

1) ok one question... is the morpheus claim credible? why would he be the SK, he sounds more like a roleblocker (dreams)? Would anyone else fit the SK profile?

just asking cause by vett's words ( or someone else?) he is only mentioned in the game as you deal with the consequenses of his actions... he doesn't actually appear.

Also we had a daytime vigilante, which would suggest a night time vigilante is already there too.... then you add me. How many kills can the town really get?

2) Mario hasn't posted anything new... then again it's a good strategy, he's only fosed on his posts.

However I find it funny that one of the reasons prof got off his back is because he kept repeating that when he died we'd see prof/hat/dtw were scum... I'm not much more experienced than prof but I see that as scum behaviour... weighing as much as one can on the self confidence of the attackers. Proof that it works, prof repeated that he didn't want to be wrong and forfeit his life.

So in conclusion... until a better target is found by our prostitute =) , i'll keep my vote there