Technical specifications? It doesn't matter. The Wii has the worst graphics this gen, but is the one that have games selling more than 15 million... Software is what really matter but everything a saw until now from both (move and kinect) are copies of the best sellers on the Wii this why I probably will not buy anyone.   

The PS Eye has been out for years now. If it was as capable as the Kinect I think developers would have taken advantage of that already.

The Move has nothing do with this. This discussion is about the the PS Eye and Kinect. Hence, devices that don't use controls.

Why would developers take advantage when first off it isn't the main PS3 controller and two, Sony themselves barely supported it? It would have been financial suicide.

Alright, maybe you are right, Move has nothing to do with this, but you still can't prove at all that PSEye isn't capable of supporting Kinect styled games, especially without Kinect games utilizing the ability to track the player moving to and from the camera. If a game only requires facial, speech, 2D movements, etc... the PSEye can do so as well.

Pretty much every Kinect game shown so far requires you to stand/run in place, something the PSEye can work with. The one game that does use forward motion (Joyride boosting) is said to be a real hit or miss action with it sometimes not registering.

That is what I am saying.

But none of those games look like they'll be any fun at all.  Isn't that what really matters?  

Kinect can be as advanced as it wants, but if all it offers are advanced versions of dance and fitness games, who is really going to care?  I doubt the casual market will.  They can already play those games on the Wii, and  especially at what Kinect costs, I don't see too many of them jumping ship.  Wii has already proved one thing this gen, and that is being the most technology advanced doesn't equal sales.  

And who really wants to play a racing game without acceleration and brake controls anyways?  Or does Joy Ride do that? I don't know,  looks awful to me either way.

Kinect looks like a bust to me.  Hardcore 360 fanboys will probably buy it, but it'll most likely be swept under the rug like a dusty 32X.

gametrailers.com has a comparison video, but they are the same and nothings different. speaking of PS3 fans not proving theres no difference. no 360 fan has proven there is.

i had a thread that asked this same question, and as a observer only just as i am now not trying or willing to debate! i've seen no difference.

Here ya go.....but we might need another batch by how things are going

'runs to make some more popcorn and order a pizza'

No.

I've played both, and while they are similar, the tracking on MS's Kinect is better. 

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=73671&page=1

The VGchartz ignore user script.

Don't get angry, get on ignoring. We've gone through this topic like soooo many times. Anyone who agrees with the topic at hand goes on my ignore list.

it should be kinect is $149.99 and the ps eye is $39.99

*breaks out the popcorn and waits to see who gets banned first for creating a deliberate flame inducing thread with equally flaming responses*