Why not just get a cheap TV now and then a 3DTV when the content comes out in a couple of years time? You'll pay less than what you would have anyway and you'll end up with a better TV in the end.

But if I don't have enough money to buy one I don't want anyone else to have one!

2k is a lot of money but not enough to make me wait a couple of years. I often watch films with friends at wknds so we are going to have it bigger, better and in 3d or semi 3d.

Alright then. For the sake of you I won't get it (-:

Thanks friend. You can do like me, buy a cheap LG today and upgrade in two or three years to a 3DTV that don't have any ghosting guaranteed and that will support 1080 3D gaming with our Xbox 720s and PS4s.

It's called 'the Squilliam plan'.

@ llewdebkram )

well, 3D TVs are able to display 2D stuff, surpring isn't it?

And the shutter-technique is pretty easy to implement, so soon every new TV will be a "3D TV" anyway.

@ Ldn.se)

Hmm.. I haven't tested any of the sets yet, but I read in reviews, that out of the LCD 3DTVs the Samsungs right now are the best. In 3D mode there seem to be some issues with cross talk though, which aren't as prominent on Plasma 3DTVs. The Panasonics seem to do a very good job there.

400Hz theoretically should be able to further reduce cross talk(if it's even available in 3D mode - many of the current 3DTVs only support 100/120Hz in 3D mode), but you really should read reviews on that matter. If the LG you are talking about is the LX9500, it seems to have problems in that regard according to this http://www.3d-display-info.com/lgs-lx9500-3d-tv-reviewed-too-much-crosstalk .

Apart from that I read LG received an award for a "cross talk free" TV they showed at "DisplayWeek", but that one works with polarizing and not with shutter glasses. http://www.sid.org/pressroom/100525.html

Ldn.se make sure you provide us with your inputs, a mini review or something. It'll be exciting to hear what u think of the 2D and 3D of this amazing screen!