By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Lebanon Attacks Israel

Israel was possibly trying to provoke an incident. Kind of like those old armoured tractor stunts they used to pull.



Around the Network
Rath said:

Israel was possibly trying to provoke an incident. Kind of like those old armoured tractor stunts they used to pull.


how was israel trying to provoke an incident doing routine yard care in their own country?



"I like my steaks how i like my women.  Bloody and all over my face"

"Its like sex, but with a winner!"

MrBubbles Review Threads: Bill Gates, Jak II, Kingdom Hearts II, The Strangers, Sly 2, Crackdown, Zohan, Quarantine, Klungo Sssavesss Teh World, MS@E3'08, WATCHMEN(movie), Shadow of the Colossus, The Saboteur

I would severely doubt that Lebanon would try to provoke anything. In a somewhat ill-defined border zone, somebody just got nervous and shot somebody else

 

The major problem is that everyone is trying to read into it. Lebanon definitely wouldn't try to provoke a country with the firepower to flatten them for the second time in four years, that's for sure.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

IS it true that Israel has a hidden agenda for taking water resources from Lebanon?



Hamas militants are some of the worse human beings alive today, they use children as shields so when the innocent are dead they can take photos and send them to global media. Also they make rehearsed scenes about combats and send them to global media too. They're always launching rockets to Israel, when is this going to stop?

Israel isn't innocent either, they have seized land that wasn't on the 1948 UN resolution and they must return it.



Around the Network

I really wish the USA would drop Isreal as an ally. Sadly we wont since we forced the UN to give them their land after the events of WWII...



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453
 

(read only the first 25 posts).

 

my input:

Lebanese people supporting the hezbolla are pupets and they don't even know it... Congratulations for supporting the making of your contry into a battlefield for Syria, Iran and Israel. What do you have to gain? noting but death and economical downfall. Why is Lebanon at odds with Israel? For syrian territory and the palestinian cause? indeed, geniune Lebanese concerns... you should go at war with china for their occupation of Tibet its just as legitimate a cause.

Israel has as much claim to any land in the area as the palestinians... they had a country there before, all these countries are relatively new and the land was occupied by both arabs (muslims or not) , jews and christians as a population for centuries. Moreover, besides the west bank (yes, the settlements do seem like provocation), all land occupied by Israel has been so as a result of wars declared by others with the intention of eradicating the country. Certainly, the countries complain, but losing a war entails paying a compensation, usualy in land... no peace treaty was signed, but only because the defeated refused to admit defeat...that was a generation ago.

Fences are not the border, they never have been in any country, there is always a buffer zone of at least a few meters, that is especially the case in militarized zones, to prevent people from comming close to the fence in the first place.

The shooters are most likely fanatic soldiers who wanted to be heroes by killing evil israelis.

Lastly, I don't like israel, but the root of all the problems in the area is the refusal of arab nations to recognize the country. You don't like how it was created? well your fathers neither, they waged a few wars about this... and lost, making the contry legitimate as any country created by militaristic scition. There were always jews in the region and their right to their own country is legitimate. Most minorities do not manage to have their own nation (think Kurds in the same area), they did, live with it, hopefully in peace. Heck, my familly on both side were refugees... one side migrated to the US during WWII, the other was in the french colonies (Algeria) and lost everything during the war, yet they moved on, worked and built new lives, like billions of others throughout the centuries.

Palestinians are not happy because their land and former homes are gone... well neither were the millions that were pushed away in all the wars in the past, yet they moved on, assimilated with their new populations... but here Palestinians still have a country... or what is now 2 since there are in effect 2 governements, that means they can grow, prosper and live in peace.. but only if they want to.



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

Kamal said:
Slimebeast said:
Kamal said:
Slimebeast said:
Kamal said:
Slimebeast said:

Geez Carl. I thought you were this nice anti-immigration bloke but then you keep spewing that hate against Israel.

Like you spew hate on every other Middle Eastern state that isn't Israel.

 

What does immigration have to do with being Pro-Israel anyway?

If the Mid East nations weren't against the West and Israel I would have nothing against them.

Most major nationalist parties in Europe are pro-Israel.

What has mid east done to the western nations which Israel hasn't done tenfold to lets say Syria, Lebanon or civilians in the Gaza strip.


This all boils down to a clash of ideologies and intolerance to co-exist with eachother.

(2)They started it. Syria and Lebanon were among the Arab nations that attacked Israel in 1948. And before the war in 1982, Lebanon had allowed PLO headquarters and terror operations against Israel from within Lebanon.

(1)Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005 and what did the civilians in Gaza do? Vote Hamas to power and start rocket attacks.

(1)  In total, between 1,100-1,400[84] Palestinians and 13 Israelis were killed in the 22-day war. (Wikipedia)

I think when you look at it this way you can see you were the aggressors, children, women, even babies have died (all Palestinian) when you open your eyes stop being soooo narrow minded you can see the whole picture.

(2) For the Arab- Israel it could be said at 1948 Britain and other nations were tying the strings in favour of zionist agendas.


All am saying Israelis (Jews) and Palestinians (Muslims) had a time where they literally did coincide in peace of course certain blips obstructed that.

Peacefully when the Muslims were in charge deciding all the rules. So why can't the Palestinians accept the other way around this time and let the Jews be in charge?



I just don't understand where all this hate against Israel and sympathy for Arab nations comes from.

It always boggles me how much the world hates a tiny nation of only 6 million people who are alone in a sea of enemies around them, only a few decades after surviving one of the biggest genocides in history.

Well actually I'm not very surprised. It's the end times, it's prophecised that exactly this would happen.



Hephaestos said:

(read only the first 25 posts).

 

my input:

Lebanese people supporting the hezbolla are pupets and they don't even know it... Congratulations for supporting the making of your contry into a battlefield for Syria, Iran and Israel. What do you have to gain? noting but death and economical downfall. Why is Lebanon at odds with Israel? For syrian territory and the palestinian cause? indeed, geniune Lebanese concerns... you should go at war with china for their occupation of Tibet its just as legitimate a cause.

Israel has as much claim to any land in the area as the palestinians... they had a country there before, all these countries are relatively new and the land was occupied by both arabs (muslims or not) , jews and christians as a population for centuries. Moreover, besides the west bank (yes, the settlements do seem like provocation), all land occupied by Israel has been so as a result of wars declared by others with the intention of eradicating the country. Certainly, the countries complain, but losing a war entails paying a compensation, usualy in land... no peace treaty was signed, but only because the defeated refused to admit defeat...that was a generation ago.

Fences are not the border, they never have been in any country, there is always a buffer zone of at least a few meters, that is especially the case in militarized zones, to prevent people from comming close to the fence in the first place.

The shooters are most likely fanatic soldiers who wanted to be heroes by killing evil israelis.

Lastly, I don't like israel, but the root of all the problems in the area is the refusal of arab nations to recognize the country. You don't like how it was created? well your fathers neither, they waged a few wars about this... and lost, making the contry legitimate as any country created by militaristic scition. There were always jews in the region and their right to their own country is legitimate. Most minorities do not manage to have their own nation (think Kurds in the same area), they did, live with it, hopefully in peace. Heck, my familly on both side were refugees... one side migrated to the US during WWII, the other was in the french colonies (Algeria) and lost everything during the war, yet they moved on, worked and built new lives, like billions of others throughout the centuries.

Palestinians are not happy because their land and former homes are gone... well neither were the millions that were pushed away in all the wars in the past, yet they moved on, assimilated with their new populations... but here Palestinians still have a country... or what is now 2 since there are in effect 2 governements, that means they can grow, prosper and live in peace.. but only if they want to.

1) Israel has no claim to that land as neither do Jews in general for a simple basic truths.
a. Ancient Israel was destroyed by Europeans over a thousand years before Modern Israel was created.
b. From before 500AD Arabs (of various religious backgrounds) were the majority of the population.
c. After 600AD Muslims became the majority and in fact the Dome of the Rock has stood longer than both Jewish temples combined.
d. At end of WWI, Arabs (Muslim and Christian) were about 90% of the population of just the Palestine Mandate area.
e. At end of WWII, it was still around 87% Arab.
f. During WWII, England promised (and you can read the actual agreements) that any Arab area that assisted them against the Turks would be given full Arab control at the end of the war where they were a majority.
g. From 1945 to 1948, due to tons of illegal migration from Europe, it was about 55/45 with Arabs still being the majority.
h. It took the 1948 war and a huge diaspora of Arab farmers to become the first refugees to give Jews a majority population of any part of the area.
i. The original UN charter gave Jews about 45% of total land, but more than 70% of the land that could actually be utilized for farming, etc.
j. Arabs had more than enough reasons to resist this racist and illegal theft of their land. It should have been under their full control as a state of their wishes.
k. Even from a religious point of view, the forefathers of Jews (Isaac) is the younger brother of the forefather of Arabs (Ishmael). The land is equally theirs in that respect as well as Isaac was never the only child of Abraham. Read the biblical story again, Ishmael was whom Abraham really took up the mountain as Ishmael was his only son before Isaac was born.

2) The root of the problem is the continous racists and aparthied treatment of Palestinians by all of their neighbors. First it was the Europeans that created a new European state called Israel. Then it was the Arabs that really only wanted the land for themselves and fought a unequal war multiple times that they had no chance in winning, especially considering they were not even close to being unified. Finally, its been the Jewish terrorist, also called settlers, who constantly terrorize all Arabs in WB near any of the illegal military outposts called settlements. Problem is, unless you live in the region you don't see the daily news generated from these people.

At one time I strongly argued for a full retreat to the green line and financial repayment to Palestinians for Arab homes within Israel that are lost to the millions of refugees. However, I've come to believe now that the only real solution is a full annexation of WB/Gaza by Israel with immediate full rights bestowed on the Arab populace, including refugees. However, Israel is at best to do that for WB only. In the end it wouldn't matter as time would be on Arab's side and they would quickly return to the majority population.

Finally, too much emphasis on this is bestowed on Muslim vs JewishChristian, but you must realize that a significant portion of the Arabs being maltreated are Christian. In fact the first militant Arab groups were heavily organized and populated by Christians as well. This last part has changed over time, but thats probably more to due with the way these groups have evolved. Also, the first militant terrorist groups in the region were Jewish (Stern Gang and Irgun) and many of Israels leaders were leaders of these groups. Kinda adds more flavor to how Israel really treats its Palestinian counterparts. It would be like if Arabs had won originally and their first governments were all run by Hamas.