I mean the concept of re-making a GoldenEye game is completely flawed. As much as they are making the game to modern standards, it is still trying to live off of the success of the original by tapping into people reminiscing about the good ol' days. For the majority of people (I expect), this game simply can not live up to the memories of the original.

It's obv.

But i think if you invite your olds friends, the ones from Goldeneye64 era, and surprise them with the "same" goldeneye you played in the golden times would be great.

Nevertheless such a remake will never receive the same meta-scores and that's the right decision because remake is remake and Zelda OoT 3D will not get a perfect 10 again, too. New ideas should be rewarded.

Or, is Zelda OoT 3D a port, a 3D-port and then it could get a perfect 10, or not? *confused*

truth .several outlets have already started preparing to do a negative review regardless of quality.

If it is a good game and people are buying and enjoying it, who cares what these elitist journalists think?

I think we all know that points will be taken off for graphics and lets hope that controls will be good too.

My expectations are at the ground. The only James Bond game I played was on the PS2

@Nintyshareholder, that dude in charge of the Zelda series at Nintendo said he'd always wanted to Re-make OoT but he didn't just want a port with higher graphics. He wanted something that would allow them to add more to the gameplay and he finally got it. 3d. It's a remake, not a port. I'll get it because I need a copy of OoT again and bcuz it won't be exactly the same thing. @Mojo, I believe that if it's a really great game, it will still get Mediocre reviews and I already listed my reasons.

Well if they can do something new that is a lot of fun in the multiplayer then it is possible that it gets a good score;..But watching the trailer doesn't show me something that we haven't seen before..

So I don't expect much..

And it will hamper your enjoyment of the game how?