I tried the same tech but not the 3DS itself. I do know very well how different 3D tech works. I already had 3D at home 7 years ago both, and I really really like all kinds of 3D. On my part I dont have any problem with any kind of 3D, that includes parallax barrier screen. But, LCD shutter glasses is more comfortable, more precise, whatever your viewing angle or distance from screen it is always working flawlessly. Parallax barrier screen is bound to cause more problem than LCD shutter glasses even tough it is glassless. To see 3D each eye should receive a different image right? Glasses can control that at 100%. Parallax barrier screen, depending on your adjustment (slider), will emit 2 light signal (image) at 2 different angle, so each eye get his own, which creates the 3D. If you move frontward or backward or change your viewing angle your messing that up. This obviously will cause more problem to sensitive person.

Glassless is neat, but not a better way of seeing 3D with the current mass market tech, that is my point. Its not about 3DS suck or PS3 3D suck, its about parallax barrier screen 3D being less effective and precise than LCD shutter glasses 3D. Both are cool, they dont suck, I wouldnt want to use a handheld carrying a pair of strange sunglasses with me on the street.

About 3D glasses and regular glasses. I think its people that dont wear regular glasses that thinks its a problem to wear both. Actually, I remember when I was a teen and had to wear glasses, it took me a couple of days to develop the habit and be use to it. Wearing 3D glasses is as natural as wearing my regular glasses. Because of that It even should be less of a problem to person that already wear glasses. Wearing both is a non issue, it doesnt change anything.

Conclusion, I easily understand why people prefer glassless 3D, I would easily prefer it too if it would give the same results. But, by any mean, im glad 3DS will not use glasses as it would really be a problem for a handheld.

I tried the same tech but not the 3DS itself. I do know very well how different 3D tech works. I already had 3D at home 7 years ago both, and I really really like all kinds of 3D. On my part I dont have any problem with any kind of 3D, that includes parallax barrier screen. But, LCD shutter glasses is more comfortable, more precise, whatever your viewing angle or distance from screen it is always working flawlessly. Parallax barrier screen is bound to cause more problem than LCD shutter glasses even tough it is glassless. To see 3D each eye should receive a different image right? Glasses can control that at 100%. Parallax barrier screen, depending on your adjustment (slider), will emit 2 light signal (image) at 2 different angle, so each eye get his own, which creates the 3D. If you move frontward or backward or change your viewing angle your messing that up. This obviously will cause more problem to sensitive person.

Glassless is neat, but not a better way of seeing 3D with the current mass market tech, that is my point. Its not about 3DS suck or PS3 3D suck, its about parallax barrier screen 3D being less effective and precise than LCD shutter glasses 3D. Both are cool, they dont suck, I wouldnt want to use a handheld carrying a pair of strange sunglasses with me on the street.

About 3D glasses and regular glasses. I think its people that dont wear regular glasses that thinks its a problem to wear both. Actually, I remember when I was a teen and had to wear glasses, it took me a couple of days to develop the habit and be use to it. Wearing 3D glasses is as natural as wearing my regular glasses. Because of that It even should be less of a problem to person that already wear glasses. Wearing both is a non issue, it doesnt change anything.

Conclusion, I easily understand why people prefer glassless 3D, I would easily prefer it too if it would give the same results. But, by any mean, im glad 3DS will not use glasses as it would really be a problem for a handheld.

Everything you just said is incorrect. A parallax screen is no less effective or precise, it simply has a viewing window. The actual 3D effect is just as pronounced and clean as it is with active shutter glasses. The difference is that you can't view the image in 3D unless you are nearly dead center.

I you did not played the 3DS itself is better not go out on forums saying that u know what tech is being used , cuz in reality no one here knows what precise tech nintendo is using ...

Yes its called a parallax barrier screen. Information on how it works is very easy to find on google. Theres not a lot of 3D autosteroscopic display option so its easy to learn and understand them. If you try the technology on one display youll have the same result on another since it works the same way. As long as the software devs did a good job.

http://www.gamesradar.com/3ds/nintendo-3ds/preview/6-reasons-why-the-3ds-is-the-most-impressive-piece-of-kit-ive-seen-in-20-years-of-gaming/a-20100730143949931040/g-20100616102754448006 < Just read this.

Whats your point? I already have a 3DS reserve and will get it first day no matter the price. No way im gonna miss 3D portable gaming. I would gladly purchase it at 500$-600$ if needed :P. Between, Its not a very good article in my opinion, its just too much.

Its just to point that the 3D effects different of some peoples are saying is good as a 1,500 TV.

Its somewhat strange to say that the 3D effect was comparable on a 4 inches screen VS a 46 inches screen even if it would be the same technology. Anyway, we both agree 3DS and 3D is nice. For people annoyed by glasses this will be a perfect solution.