I am non-religious myself - I don't even believe Jesus lived or anything like that. I once considered myself an atheist, but not anymore. Were I to consider myself an atheist, that would imply that I have made a decision to not believe in anything on the spiritual/religious side of existance; when in fact I haven't made a decision because: A) It is not a relevant point to me; and, B) I currently have no way of really knowing the truth of anything - and I am not wise enough to believe that I do know the answer based on such limited evidence that I have acquired.
"I can't stand it when some religious person tries to force there view's on you."
The irony in this statement for me is that, even though I live in a very religious area, it is the atheists who attempt to push their viewpoints on others much harder than anyone else. They will argue, and strongly attempt to make religious people look ignorant. While I don't believe in a God myself, I do respect the views of religious people - and find religious people to be great company, often very pleasant and nice people.
"I think the bible is nothing but a morality book,trying to tell you how you should act"
This statement is similar to calling a religious person who subscribes to the bible as ignorant for viewing the bible as something much more. Just for the record - the Jesus character challenged established rules, beliefs, and morals; consider that the bible might not be what you believe it is without reading it. In the very first book Jesus himself states that he has come with a sword to bring to sons and daughters to challenge their parents, who he describes as their worst enemies - the parents being the symbol of belief, morality, and rules; in Freudian terminology, it is a battle against the Super-ego, or in Nietzschean terms based on his book Also Sprach Zarathustra in Metamorphosis, it is a call out for the camel bearing the weight of beliefs and rules to become a more moral creature freed from the chains of belief we limit ourselves to.