sony is the one saying that nintendo shouldn't knack 3d glasses, they aren't.

Yes, and they are both not aiming their products at the same kind of market.  Handhelds have yet to replace living room consoles.  And are even further from replacing home entertainment in general. 

Viewing 3D movies on the 3DS with your family? 

When it comes to the tech behind it, Nintendo is doing very good with the 3DS. I can't say otherwise.  Yet, mocking the glasses version of 3D like Reggie did during this year's E3 to promote their device is petty.  The same as when Butler mocks the Wii or Kinect.   But Nintendo isn't just mocking Sony in this case, but the entire current 3D TV industry.  As if to say to the consumer that their product can replace what you could get for your living room when it's obviously not the case at this point in time since the tech is just nowhere there yet. 

Please enlighten me what htey are supposed to do to market their devise.  Glasses have been needed since forever for 3D and now they ahve something that doesn't need glasses.  Thus their marketing promo is "3D without the Glasses"

spin it how you want in who they are knocking or making fun of or whatever, you just spitting out bs.  They aren't targeting a compnay, they are targeting an IDEA.  that idea is you no longer need glasses for a 3D experience

No it won't replace home entertainment, we aren't morons.  But you are also being blind as well.  Can you not see that once this IDEA of "3D with no glasses" is spread or catches on, that leaves millions of people NOT BUYING a tv that needs 3D glasses in opt for waiting till they are not required.  Its the idea that will stall 3DTV sales, not the 3DS.

Read a few CES 2010 read reports. The TV's there were said to work from any angle. Well at least the Intel one, Phillips and Samsung. Magnetic TV was poor from what Ive read.

Granted it's not just Sony. But talking out at Nintendo when Nintendo have a point, is nothing but selling their existing range. 

Holographic by the way is scientifically said to be 20 years away. So your safe waiting 3 years for 3DTV without glasses.

Technology is moving very fast at the moment. 

A reason why I wont ever own a BLU RAY. A reason why I buy films from July onwards via download if I want a HD film.

3D films and Games will most likely be mainstream in 4-5 years. So it's logical to wait for the glassless TV's. SKY is looking into 3d live TV in the next few years. You cant imagine a family of 6 walking around the house with a pair of glasses in hand everytime you want to go to the toilet, make a drink, get a sandwhich just to continue watching Prison Break?

What if you lose a pair? Battery runs out?

IT's clumsy, more widgets to your living room etc.

Personally, imagine in 3 years 3DTV, games, movies, live TV all with no glasses and no remotes. Thats a complete overhall of modern entertainment. 

The only step left after that is holographic which is years away. 

So everyone will be safe in 3 years to purchase the right equipment to last.

Knocking 3DTV with glasses is very good imo. And everyone should do so to stop people wasting money.

You can already buy PC monitors that omit 3d without glasses from Phillips. And that can even take a 2d image and process a 3d output. It's only a few years away. And 3DS will make consumers hopefully realise this. 

Nintendo are promoting the proper future of 3d entertainment. I back them fully on this.

I totally agree about this, in the last days I wrote countless times that any game for any console using stereoscopic 3D is totally agnostic with regard to the use of 3D glasses. The hit for Nintendo would be
only to its image, for having bashed glasses, but having to rely on them until glasses-free home TVs become mainstream.

Which is publicly viewed by almost all gadget media with 3 years. Perfect for next gen systems.

lol.  After all the PR shit Sony has heaped on Nintendo over the years (carts, kiddy, casual, "handheld ghetto", etc ,etc) this is pretty rich.

Practice what you preach hypocrites.

Within 3 years the first production model glasses-free 3D TVs will be available for sale, if there won't be any unexpected problems, but how much more time will it take before those techs become mainstream? I know I'll stick to 2D TV until glasses-free 3D TV will be cheap, but people wanting 3D since the start will have to accept glasses for non portable uses for a few years. Their choice, I don't care. And even if Sony will push that tech at full steam, it will still be an expensive niche by the time glasses-free techs start becoming mainstream, so, if a minority of rich enthusiasts is willing to pioneer, why should I stop them? Early adopters help me find cheaper tech a few months or years later, they'll do it for glasses 3D that I don't care about, but they'll do the same for glasses-free, that I'd like, so be they forever blessed and nobody dare stop them!   

And to come back to my point, even in the most optimistic scenario for glasses-free, if Wii2 is launched early, it will have to rely partially or totally on glasses for its first years.

Agreed. I don't see why anyone in the right mind would invest $2000 in a 3DTV with glasses now, when they will be obsolete in just a few years time when 3DTVs WITHOUT the need of glasses makes it on the scene. You might as well be burning your $2000.

 I know one thing, I am not buying a 3DTV until they do not require the stupid glasses, AND are available at a mass market price, like $500-600. That probably won't happen for another 10 years, but I don't care. It's simply a waste of money. I mean I JUST got a decent HDTV.