$249 or maybe $300.
Solid_Snake4RD said:
wii didn't entirely succeed because of the low entry price but PS3's expensive price helped it too alot about the PS3,even with the features at an expensive price and brand power it didn't succeed
so saying 3DS would sell well is a guarantee but saying it will be no.1 even if $300 AND PSP2 releasing under the price next year puts its no.1 position in a bit of doubt |
well i dont' know how many people are like me, but a consoles price affects me, not another consoles price.
I didn't buy the Wii because the PS3 was $600. I bought the Wii because it was a reasonable price I was willing to pay and it was a system that looked fun and I wanted.
I didn't buy a PS3 beacuse of the price. Sure it looked like it woudl be fun, had great features and based on past I expected it to have great games as well. If asked me before this generation started which systems I would buy, I would for sure had said PS3. All my friends and seemed everyone I knew owned a PS2, lots of great games for it, and so on. There seemed no reason not to get PS3, and when shown seemed same way, but then $600 and its like "oh never mind then, I can't afford that"
But not affording PS3 didn't make me get Wii. It wouldnt' make me get a 360 instead either. I woudl get any system I want, not based on other conosles, but based on the console itself and if in my price range
Solid_Snake4RD said:
yes i nkow most likely it will be cheap but i was just thinking the capabilities they have shown never seen before mostly so it could be expensive nintendo products are never really expensive but they could price it higher as DSi will still be selling and PSP is posing no competition
anyways from the the interview,it better be good or even at low price people won't buy |
i thought you were on the big bandwagon of it being a underpowered system. hell only about PSP graphics correct and that is what how many years old system. Most of all other factors, the DS has had forever hardware wise. Then it goes to the stereostopic screen and face it, at that size it ain't that expensive.
irstupid said:
i thought you were on the big bandwagon of it being a underpowered system. hell only about PSP graphics correct and that is what how many years old system. Most of all other factors, the DS has had forever hardware wise. Then it goes to the stereostopic screen and face it, at that size it ain't that expensive. |
it is powered and upgraded from NINTENDO DS but not what it should have been
here we are discussing even with 3DS not being upgraded enough for what it should have been,with all the 3D and other tech stuff it looks like being expensive even if just a bit but that is not what Nintendo does,it always come with inexpensive solutions but here it could be costly
Solid_Snake4RD said:
it is powered and upgraded from NINTENDO DS but not what it should have been here we are discussing even with 3DS not being upgraded enough for what it should have been,with all the 3D and other tech stuff it looks like being expensive even if just a bit but that is not what Nintendo does,it always come with inexpensive solutions but here it could be costly |
and what should have the 3DS been upgraded to?
It is said to be at least Wii graphics, if not more potentially, and I believe I have seen you in lots of posts saying it is impossible for a handheld to do PS360 graphics and power cause no fans.
So if it is Wii , yet impossible for PS360. Where should it be?
irstupid said:
well i dont' know how many people are like me, but a consoles price affects me, not another consoles price. I didn't buy the Wii because the PS3 was $600. I bought the Wii because it was a reasonable price I was willing to pay and it was a system that looked fun and I wanted. I didn't buy a PS3 beacuse of the price. Sure it looked like it woudl be fun, had great features and based on past I expected it to have great games as well. If asked me before this generation started which systems I would buy, I would for sure had said PS3. All my friends and seemed everyone I knew owned a PS2, lots of great games for it, and so on. There seemed no reason not to get PS3, and when shown seemed same way, but then $600 and its like "oh never mind then, I can't afford that" But not affording PS3 didn't make me get Wii. It wouldnt' make me get a 360 instead either. I woudl get any system I want, not based on other conosles, but based on the console itself and if in my price range |
yes you don't care about the price as you liked the console and you bought it and you had idea of the games
but the general public and even many hardcores were going to buy the PS3 as the brand power and momentum it had
but then SONY sacfrificed PS3 for blu-ray promotion and they everyone shifted to the 360 and the wii
expensive PS3 didn't make you get a wii but the general public and casuals don't follow like us
and as PS3 wasn't able to overshadow its competitive console like PS2 did to dreamcast,gamecube and xbox the other consoles got media and public attention
irstupid said:
and what should have the 3DS been upgraded to? It is said to be at least Wii graphics, if not more potentially, and I believe I have seen you in lots of posts saying it is impossible for a handheld to do PS360 graphics and power cause no fans. So if it is Wii , yet impossible for PS360. Where should it be? |
it is impossible for a handheld to do PS360 as it will have to be bigger than 3DS,more expensive and more fans will be needed
i am not saying 3DS isn't powerful,it is a huge upgradation from the NDS stuff but my reply was to people claiming PS360 graphics and the fact that IWATA said they upgraded the graphics after 6 years.
it was a big leap from what NDS was capable of but not what was still existant.it was a small leap there
it is like Wii<<<<3DS<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<PS30
even this could be false as 3DS doesn't seem more powerfull than Wii but only looking as its a small screen
Solid_Snake4RD said:
yes you don't care about the price as you liked the console and you bought it and you had idea of the games but the general public and even many hardcores were going to buy the PS3 as the brand power and momentum it had
but then SONY sacfrificed PS3 for blu-ray promotion and they everyone shifted to the 360 and the wii
expensive PS3 didn't make you get a wii but the general public and casuals don't follow like us and as PS3 wasn't able to overshadow its competitive console like PS2 did to dreamcast,gamecube and xbox the other consoles got media and public attention |
It's not about the price; it's about percieved value. PS3 just didn't justify the extra 300$ from a Wii or 360. The games weren't there, blu-ray was young and uncertain, etc. People don't just shift to the next available cheaper product if it doesn't fulfill their needs.
Lately, PS3 is selling great due to momentum and high quality / diverse lineup. Not due to the 300$ tag (at least not solely because of that).
My themeforest portfolio:
Nintendo 3DS - $189.99
Nintendo DSi XL - $149.99
Nintendo DSi - $129.99
Nintendo DS lite - $99.99
routsounmanman said:
Lately, PS3 is selling great due to momentum and high quality / diverse lineup. Not due to the 300$ tag (at least not solely because of that). |
even with the perceived value no system would have made no1 with $600 price tag
a normal family can't purchase that expensive stuff,leave aloe many hardcore fans weren't able to purchase it
do you remember why DREAMCAST,GAMCUBE,XBOX didn't sell well
it was because PS2 was cheap,carring momentum and brand power and overshdowed them
PS3 couldn't overshdow Wii or 360 because of its high price.
BRAND POWER AND MOMENTUM AND PRICE ARE VERY IMPORTANT