It seems that after over 3,000 user reviews of 1.0 they are not letting anyone elese review the game. They are censoring user generated comments pertaining to the situation. Is that good or bad?
It seems that after over 3,000 user reviews of 1.0 they are not letting anyone elese review the game. They are censoring user generated comments pertaining to the situation. Is that good or bad?
Well It'd be pretty obvious why. User reviews would have become a magnet for blowback on the firing. They'd close it for the same reason we'd close a really negative and out of hand thread.
Of course, while logical, it was the logical reaction to the consequence of an entirely illogical and immoral firing.
I'm a mod, come to me if there's mod'n to do.
Chrizum is the best thing to happen to the internet, Period.
Serves me right for challenging his sales predictions!
Bet with dsisister44: Red Steel 2 will sell 1 million within it's first 365 days of sales.
Hah, I wonder if CNet has realised that you should really really try not to piss off the internet community yet.
leo-j said: gamespot sucks. |
Ummm, no they don't. On the spot is a great show and their live coverage is awesome. It's just a bad situation they are in
well CNet is one of the worst organizations on the internet. They arent even worth going to. Gizmondo is 100% better.
finalsquall said:
Ummm, no they don't. On the spot is a great show and their live coverage is awesome. It's just a bad situation they are in |
On the Spot has the least professionally done video podcast on the internet. Once IGN Weekly comes back starting next year there will be no better. Plus sites like PSFanboy, TeamXbox and al those have better coverage then Gamespot ever had and thats sad since they arent even in IGN's league.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.