"It's an epic myth. It was important to portray his origins, the mystery boy of a virgin birth capable of performing miracles. While it sounds very Christian, it really fits the archetype of most myths."

That's no excuse for something that had no purpose in the story. Such births in myths actually went somewhere with those. You don't just throw in elements like that if you aren't going to do things with them.

Plus getting Anakin padded out the middle of the movie, which is objectively far worse than anything Jar-Jar did, in terms of raw minutes of time we didn't need on Tatooine.

What the hell are you people talking about? Get back on topic!

Speaking of which, their response literally makes no sense to me. Castlevania has never really been a "family friendly" series but it's not over the top either, if they have to alter the themes then they're doing something wrong. Not to mention Wii and DS already have CV titles. It's not an impossible feat, clowns!

Its the regular "Lets hate on Star Wars Prequels" time!

Sorry, I don't read people saying characters are jerks to mean that they don't like the character. I've liked plenty of characters that I'd classify as jerks...

I do understand the claims of Dave Cox (funny name).

Judging from the "performances" of third party games on that system, I can understand how they wouldn't be willing to put any energy on a Wii version. 

People will always throw the lame excuses: "they don't even put efforts into their games" or how "everything they do are on-rail shooter" and shit. But the truth is games that were given efforts like Zack and Wiki, The Crystal Bearers, No More Heroes, among others just don't sell nearly as much as the ones created for PS3 and 360.

Blame the marketing, blame the developers, blame the HD consoles, your Grandma and your cat, but the outcome in the end is still the same.   Third party games don't sell on the Wii compared to the ones on the HD consoles.

And the exceptions don't make the rule. ^_-

Im shocked, but not mad. People shouldnt get mad over a small opinion and this guys opinion is just full of hot air. Apparrently the past main Castlevainia titles on the NES and SNES aren't mainstream to the eyes of this guy. If I had a nickle for everytime, developers, or people in general in the gaming industry say that, Id be rich.

LMFAOROFL!!!  (seriously ¬_¬)

And you're trying to tell me Monster Hunter 3 isn't as niche a title as NMH?

Again, even the numbers of Monster Hunter Tri pale in comparison to how a game like this perfoms on the HD consoles.  The game is selling less and less, almost abysmal actually (just a few weeks, and has barely sold 1.4M units.  The game is selling barely a few thousands after only 7 weeks in the west, and hasn't even reached  half a milion in America and Europe combined).  The game was a relatively successful in Japan, but elsewhere in the world is an entirely other story.  Indeed, that would be expected from a niche game, right?

In comparison, most games of that caliber reach the half milion point in their first month (or even sooner) on the HD consoles.

How are the NES and SNES titles of any relevance to the argument here?

I'm sorry, what? Are you serious?

As serious as he is calling NMH a niche game. ¬_¬