By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Ninja Theory boss: Naughty Dog is “best console developer in the world”

CGI-Quality said:

To the Damon Jones/Michael Jordan thing, sure Jordan has been widely accepted as the greatest basketball player of all time, I can agree to that. Whether or not he IS the best can be disputed though, just like this here. When something is indisputable, there is no argument, and therefor the of it can't be of much use, making more than inferior, but pointless/useless. This article and your example can both be disputed and the opinions regarding them aren't useless/pointless.

Also, you say Ninja Theory's opinion has been disproven, again I ask you, what dev is "indisputably" better? How was it disproven?

I know you'll find a way to just say I'm wrong and you're right, as usual, which is one of the reasons I try to avoid debating with you.

You avoid debating with me... because I find a way to be right.   No offense, but when people keep finding a way to be right in debates with me, I consider the fact that I may be wrong.  It's easier that way because then I can change my opinion and be right.  You can find proof on this on this very subject where i'm sure I've argued before that opinions can't be wrong on this board... until I had a very interesting conversation with soemone where i realized opinions actually can be wrong. 

Either way... I think Magic Johnson is the greatest basketball player, and can provide enough facts to make a credible arguement out of it.   I wouldn't begrudge anyone who said Michael Jordan or Bill Russel was the greatest either.

Damon Jones though... no.  Or a less insulting comparison.  Kobe Bryant.

 

Miyamoto is by any objective measure I can see the greatest developer.  I could see arguements for a few others, like Will Wright, Sid Meyer and even the guy from Farmville.

As for Naughty Dog... there just is no credible arguement for it for "best developer in the world" unless you use some VERY heavy qualifiers.  Like "best graphical console developer."  Which were not used.  More on that in the next post though.

The main difference here though is the difference between "Greatest" and "Favorite."

They are two very different things that two many people combine because they treat their opinions as universal truth.

Because you like a game best isn't even remotely a valid arguement for why someone or something is the best.

Most people who think Michael Jordan are the best can't freaking stand him... because he destroyed their favorite teams.



Around the Network
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
Kasz216 said:
CGI-Quality said:
Kasz216 said:
CGI-Quality said:
Kasz216 said:
CGI-Quality said:
mirgro said:
CGI-Quality said:
Squilliam said:
CGI-Quality said:
Squilliam said:
CGI-Quality said:

That's "clearly" your opinion though, which is what he's trying to explain to you.

Clearly Miyamoto is considered the greatest developer of all time. Since hes still producing work then clearly in a console sense he is head, shoulders, torso, hips, legs and knees and ankles above Naughty Dog.

Clearly...

And that "clearly"  disproves nothing or anyone.

By these standards:

Article:

You: Its only an opinion

Done.

Dismissed.

If opinions don't matter then this whole thread is irrelevant so why are you here?

Your problem is you think because YOU say something, it's factual, or you post like nobody can disagree with your thought.

I'm here because like you, I gave an opinion and am allowed to do so.


I would like to play the "there are in fact superior and inferior opnions" card right here.

Well, the only way anything is inferior within a debate is if you're arguing fact vs opinion. Yes, facts are always superior because you can't dispute them, but in here, there have only been opinions.

Nobody is saying that you , Squill or anyone else that doesn't think Naughty Dog are the best devs are "factually" wrong (Hell, I don't even think they are). But the people that do are entitled to that, and can't be factually proven wrong on this.

I don't understand the heat over that.

Actually inferior opinions CAN be proven factually wrong.  If it was my opinion that Damon Jones was the best basketball player of all time, this can very eaisly be proven wrong based on nothing that is purely factual.

If anyone claimed Damon Jones was the best basketball player of all time they would be laughed... off the planet basically by anybody.

Naughty Dog aren't exactly Damon Jones...

however they're Scottie Pippen at they're very best... not even best "on the own team" during their prime era.

As I've said, there's no such thing as an inferior opinion. It's either just an opinion, or can be factually proven wrong, making that opinion useless. In this case, it can't be proven wrong, it can be disputed, which doesn't make either of the opinions superior.

Just because many of us disagree that Nughty Dog are the best devs doesn't automatically make our opinions superior. It just means we disagree, which is simple logic really.

You are wrong however.

There are such things as inferior opinions.

Each opinion can be judged based on the foundation of that opinion.

Some opinion's have much more basis then others.

Or do you think Damon Jones being the greatest basketball player of all time is just as valid an opinion as Michael Jordan?  No offense but that's a fools opinion.

There are MANY actual factual and contextual arguements for some developers are the greatest of all time.  Naughty Dog pretty much has none of these.

If you can prove it wrong, the opinion is useless. If you cannot, it's nothing more than an objection. Ninja Theory's opinion can't be proven completely false, even if many don't agree.

Besides, what they're talking about can mean so many things. In what way are the best devs? Artistically? Technically? The most entertaining? They pedestaled Naughty Dog without too much on the specifics. It's their opinion though and it can't be changed, altered, disproved. It is what it is and many agree with them, at least right now.

You can have the final word though, which I'm sure you'll take that oppurtunity.


So, in otherwords... anyone who says Damon Jones is a better basketball player then Michael Jordan is correct.  Or at least as correct as those who believe otherwise.  Which is the question I knew you'd dodge... which is why i bolded it... and you've still ignored it.

Once again.... as already stated, they said best Devs.  This means overall, ALL things considered unless stated otherwise.

You know, like if you wanted to claim that Damon Jones is the best NBA player with a Mohawk, who has reinacted a Michael Jackson video with Shaq. 


On the basis of "best developer all things considered" said opinion can and has been disproven.

There isn't one area in which they lead in the "stats."

The claim that all opinions are equally right is a lie made only to stop arguements without someone feeling bad for having an opinion that's based on shakey ground.

There are countless dumb opinions that can be justified by it.  Like the afore mentioned Damon Jones opinion you keep dodging. 



it's kobe bryant. 80 points in one game!

Wilt Chamberlin scored 100 points in one game.


http://www.nba.com/history/wilt100_moments.html



Spin?  There is no spin needed.

It's disproven by their being no credible criteria in which to consider them the best.

Just like their is no credible criteria in which to consider Damon Jones the best.

For those agreeing... they've actually put forth no arguements on to why they consider them the best.


Looking at their catalogue is really all the proof you need.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naughty_Dog#Games


Lets break down this catalogue.

The first 3 games are of little note.


Then you've got the Crash Bandicoot Games... games that were second/third best when it came to the 3D platformers of their time if your generous.

Jak and Dexter.... once again a series that was generally widely overshadowed by the like of Insominiac.

Then Uncharted 1 &2.


Any attempt to claim they were the best would have to be soley on the Basis of Uncharted and Uncharted 2 since there were many "above" them in prior years in their specific genres.

Even furtherso based pretty much on JUST Uncharted 2 being the only game with GOTY consideration.

That's like... well the afore mentioned claiming Wilt Chamberlin is the best center ever because he scored 100 points in one game or Kobe Bryant's 80.  Bill Russel was better and playing at the exact time.


Uncharted 2 set a record for most GOTY awards (though partially because of the rapid increase in GOTY awards.)

A huge feat... however it's just 1 feat... for Developers like Miyamoto, Wright and Meyer... the list of accomplishments roll out the door.



Kasz216 said:
CGI-Quality said:

To the Damon Jones/Michael Jordan thing, sure Jordan has been widely accepted as the greatest basketball player of all time, I can agree to that. Whether or not he IS the best can be disputed though, just like this here. When something is indisputable, there is no argument, and therefor the of it can't be of much use, making more than inferior, but pointless/useless. This article and your example can both be disputed and the opinions regarding them aren't useless/pointless.

Also, you say Ninja Theory's opinion has been disproven, again I ask you, what dev is "indisputably" better? How was it disproven?

I know you'll find a way to just say I'm wrong and you're right, as usual, which is one of the reasons I try to avoid debating with you.

You avoid debating with me... because I find a way to be right.   No offense, but when people keep finding a way to be right in debates with me, I consider the fact that I may be wrong.  It's easier that way because then I can change my opinion and be right.  You can find proof on this on this very subject where i'm sure I've argued before that opinions can't be wrong on this board... until I had a very interesting conversation with soemone where i realized opinions actually can be wrong. 

Either way... I think Magic Johnson is the greatest basketball player, and can provide enough facts to make a credible arguement out of it.   I wouldn't begrudge anyone who said Michael Jordan or Bill Russel was the greatest either.

Damon Jones though... no.  Or a less insulting comparison.  Kobe Bryant.

 

Miyamoto is by any objective measure I can see the greatest developer.  I could see arguements for a few others, like Will Wright, Sid Meyer and even the guy from Farmville.

As for Naughty Dog... there just is no credible arguement for it for "best developer in the world" unless you use some VERY heavy qualifiers.  Like "best graphical console developer."  Which were not used.  More on that in the next post though.

The main difference here though is the difference between "Greatest" and "Favorite."

They are two very different things that two many people combine because they treat their opinions as universal truth.

Because you like a game best isn't even remotely a valid arguement for why someone or something is the best.

Most people who think Michael Jordan are the best can't freaking stand him... because he destroyed their favorite teams.

he is the best. long live mickael jay fox



Kasz216 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
Kasz216 said:
CGI-Quality said:
Kasz216 said:
CGI-Quality said:
Kasz216 said:
CGI-Quality said:
mirgro said:
CGI-Quality said:
Squilliam said:
CGI-Quality said:
Squilliam said:
CGI-Quality said:

That's "clearly" your opinion though, which is what he's trying to explain to you.

Clearly Miyamoto is considered the greatest developer of all time. Since hes still producing work then clearly in a console sense he is head, shoulders, torso, hips, legs and knees and ankles above Naughty Dog.

Clearly...

And that "clearly"  disproves nothing or anyone.

By these standards:

Article:

You: Its only an opinion

Done.

Dismissed.

If opinions don't matter then this whole thread is irrelevant so why are you here?

Your problem is you think because YOU say something, it's factual, or you post like nobody can disagree with your thought.

I'm here because like you, I gave an opinion and am allowed to do so.


I would like to play the "there are in fact superior and inferior opnions" card right here.

Well, the only way anything is inferior within a debate is if you're arguing fact vs opinion. Yes, facts are always superior because you can't dispute them, but in here, there have only been opinions.

Nobody is saying that you , Squill or anyone else that doesn't think Naughty Dog are the best devs are "factually" wrong (Hell, I don't even think they are). But the people that do are entitled to that, and can't be factually proven wrong on this.

I don't understand the heat over that.

Actually inferior opinions CAN be proven factually wrong.  If it was my opinion that Damon Jones was the best basketball player of all time, this can very eaisly be proven wrong based on nothing that is purely factual.

If anyone claimed Damon Jones was the best basketball player of all time they would be laughed... off the planet basically by anybody.

Naughty Dog aren't exactly Damon Jones...

however they're Scottie Pippen at they're very best... not even best "on the own team" during their prime era.

As I've said, there's no such thing as an inferior opinion. It's either just an opinion, or can be factually proven wrong, making that opinion useless. In this case, it can't be proven wrong, it can be disputed, which doesn't make either of the opinions superior.

Just because many of us disagree that Nughty Dog are the best devs doesn't automatically make our opinions superior. It just means we disagree, which is simple logic really.

You are wrong however.

There are such things as inferior opinions.

Each opinion can be judged based on the foundation of that opinion.

Some opinion's have much more basis then others.

Or do you think Damon Jones being the greatest basketball player of all time is just as valid an opinion as Michael Jordan?  No offense but that's a fools opinion.

There are MANY actual factual and contextual arguements for some developers are the greatest of all time.  Naughty Dog pretty much has none of these.

If you can prove it wrong, the opinion is useless. If you cannot, it's nothing more than an objection. Ninja Theory's opinion can't be proven completely false, even if many don't agree.

Besides, what they're talking about can mean so many things. In what way are the best devs? Artistically? Technically? The most entertaining? They pedestaled Naughty Dog without too much on the specifics. It's their opinion though and it can't be changed, altered, disproved. It is what it is and many agree with them, at least right now.

You can have the final word though, which I'm sure you'll take that oppurtunity.


So, in otherwords... anyone who says Damon Jones is a better basketball player then Michael Jordan is correct.  Or at least as correct as those who believe otherwise.  Which is the question I knew you'd dodge... which is why i bolded it... and you've still ignored it.

Once again.... as already stated, they said best Devs.  This means overall, ALL things considered unless stated otherwise.

You know, like if you wanted to claim that Damon Jones is the best NBA player with a Mohawk, who has reinacted a Michael Jackson video with Shaq. 


On the basis of "best developer all things considered" said opinion can and has been disproven.

There isn't one area in which they lead in the "stats."

The claim that all opinions are equally right is a lie made only to stop arguements without someone feeling bad for having an opinion that's based on shakey ground.

There are countless dumb opinions that can be justified by it.  Like the afore mentioned Damon Jones opinion you keep dodging. 



it's kobe bryant. 80 points in one game!

Wilt Chamberlin scored 100 points in one game.


http://www.nba.com/history/wilt100_moments.html



i scored 105 in high school in one game, but that was PE.



Around the Network

And Wilt Chamberlin was playing in the NBA when he scored 100.



while im sure ND is a fantastic developer and one of the best, i disagree. that honor goes to nintendo IMO.



                                                                                                  
CGI-Quality said:

No Kasz, you always THINK you're right, and your response to me sounds quite narcissistic.


While I don't see eye to eye with everything he says, the israel thread for example, he is 100% right in this case. You just don't like it because it flies right in the face of what you have been preaching on these forums.



CGI-Quality said:
mirgro said:
CGI-Quality said:

No Kasz, you always THINK you're right, and your response to me sounds quite narcissistic.


While I don't see eye to eye with everything he says, the israel thread for example, he is 100% right in this case. You just don't like it because it flies right in the face of what you have been preaching on these forums.

You're the same guy calling posters iditos for opinions, I can't take much you say seriously at this point. If anything has flown in someone's face, it is people's opinions you can't handle.

And you are the guy who thinks that all opinions are the same and here are no inferior and superior opinions. How can YOU be taken seriously at all. I know I'm not old at all, but I have seen the world, so maybe you should too and you will change your mind as well. Used to think like you back when I was 17/18 and before I got out and saw the world.



mirgro said:
CGI-Quality said:
mirgro said:
CGI-Quality said:

No Kasz, you always THINK you're right, and your response to me sounds quite narcissistic.


While I don't see eye to eye with everything he says, the israel thread for example, he is 100% right in this case. You just don't like it because it flies right in the face of what you have been preaching on these forums.

You're the same guy calling posters iditos for opinions, I can't take much you say seriously at this point. If anything has flown in someone's face, it is people's opinions you can't handle.

And you are the guy who thinks that all opinions are the same and here are no inferior and superior opinions. How can YOU be taken seriously at all. I know I'm not old at all, but I have seen the world, so maybe you should too and you will change your mind as well. Used to think like you back when I was 17.

If your A guy who thinks there are differences between 'OPINIONS" , then you are gravely mistaken...it's called an 'opinion' for a reason..not fact

So is YOUR opinion < A game developers opinion ON another game developer? Cuz if there ever is a clear case of inferior opinion this would be a great example..good thing is not many think that way ;)

And btw spouting petty insults about age yada yada yada doesn't exactly prove a point...other than the point that you yourself act the way you blame others cuz such words are by no means are 'mature' ... trust me ;) even my grandpa will tell ya that and he is like 90 now

oh and btw if your so frustrated that another is not agreeing with your superior 'opinion'...take a chill pill and avoid these threads..cuz opinions are in abundance in da interwebz as I hear



In-Kat-We-Trust Brigade!

"This world is Merciless, and it's also very beautiful"

For All News/Info related to the PlayStation Vita, Come and join us in the Official PSV Thread!