S.T.A.G.E. said:
jarrod said:
V-r0cK said:
rubido said:
V-r0cK said:
rubido said: So they are not putting this on the wii? What the hell is wrong with capcom? |
Couldnt HD console owners say the same thing about Capcom vs Tatsunoko?
|
Sure! Go ahead and do that if you like :P
But independent of that, I find it odd that a game that can be easily done on the wii is not ported over. WTH capcom?!?! Did anyone not tell them which console has the most number consumers out there?
|
Have you looked at the sales of Capcom vs Tatsunoko? (about 260K) Its so small compared to sales of SF4 for PS3 or 360 (each over 1.4M). Just because Wii has the larger fanbase doesnt mean it'll sell better. (If thats the case then all games should be made for Wii from now on) It goes to show that when it comes to fighting games HD console is where its at.
|
lol. The best selling fighter this gen by a gigantic margin (Smash Brawl) is on Wii. It sold triple what SF4 did. Hell, it's actually the best selling fighter in history.
TvC hasn't lit up the charts like SF4 did, but uh, consider the game and what sort of push it got. Tatsunoko? How many westerners even know what that is? As is it's still exceeded Capcom's expectations by all accounts and is actually on track to outsell MVC2 PS2. Had TvC been on PS3 or 360, it probably would've sold similarly. Had SF4 been on Wii, it also probably would've sold similarly. The two aren't exactly an apples/apples comparison...
|
SSMB is a brawler not a fighter. SSF4 is credited with restoring the fighting genre to its former glory. Why was SSMB not given this credit? Because its not a fighter.
|
Final Fight's a brawler, Smash Bros is a fighter. A pretty competitive one at that, with a dedicated tourney scene even.
SF4 was credited with restoring Street Fighter to it's former glory. The rest of the genre (outside Blazblue's surprise success) is very much still on life support, with former heavyweights like Tekken, Soulcalibur and KOF continuing their perpetual declines last year.