By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Sony: If It Didn't Work On Wii, Don't Try It On Move

SaviorX on 24 May 2010
Severance said:
thats very very great news, i was really disappointed at how many crappy third party games on Wii... i've never seen a console have that much, heck even very liked games such as Mad World and Red Steel 2 are totally crappy, i think for Wii its first Party or no party (no pun intended)

The thing is:

The Wii got all of the Market Leader's shovelware, but none of its 3rd party blockbusters.



Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. "  thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."

Around the Network
superchunk on 24 May 2010

ok, so Sony can realize that devs are just stupid and its not Wii's fault some games failed. Why can't the 3rd parties realize that.

Don't force a square into a round hole.



joeorc on 24 May 2010
patjuan32 said:
joeorc said:
patjuan32 said:
joeorc said:
Naum said:
So they will do what Nintendo did during the Snes/N64 era... look what that did.

yup make some awsome game's and guess what the fact that Sony is already in 3rd . so why the hell does it matter now anyway. Quality is a good thing if you ask me. it's not about catching the Wii, Sony's going for quality. why worry about placement in a console war when your already 3rd!

If Sony was not worried about their placement in the console war then they'd focus on developing games for the audience that they are competing for. Instead they want to introduce the move to attract the mainstream audience to the PS3 to improve sales and thus change the Placement of the PS3 in the console wars.

o'l come on now just because the market leader has something unique does not mean that one of the other's would not add it if they could, now would you have not seen their technology added if the Wii did not take off?

the fact that Sony waited because they got burned in the past with motion control's they put out the Eyetoy and 3rd party's did not support it like they said they would.

so what if they added it later, atleat they combined it's use with the EYETOY to give it more function's.

Many consumer's are very happy with motion control's for gaming, now Sony has added that option to the PS3.

unless Only Nintendo can have that technology?

 

Sony and Microsoft jump on the motion control band wagon after the Wii became successful. They both came out against motion controls in interviews and look now. This has nothing to do with copying the Uniquess of the market leader and everything to do with sales. I could go on but some of your comments make you sound like a bitter Fanboy.

bitter fanboy..lol

AND ONCE AGAIN SO WHAT IF THEY DID!

and PR matter's why?

just because some PR speak is put out does not mean what they stated was every thing they may plan on doing!

alot of PR is just trying to hurt on the other's sale's. the fact that.

calling someone a bitter fanboy it just seem's to me if anyone is bitter it's the people who try to make out PR as some sort of past truth to keep bring up when they want to keep trying to discourage or downplay any an all thing's about another system because of some slight toward a system they have a preference for

sort of like some PR.. speak we have heard before. so in effect your doing exactly the same thing you are mad about!



I AM BOLO

100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...

ps:

Proud psOne/2/3/p owner.  I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.

Squilliam on 24 May 2010

Sony: Core games won't sell on Move.

Thats what they said right?



Tease.

Legend11 on 24 May 2010
NoCtiS_NoX said:

Source: kotaku.com

 

Sony's PlayStation Move motion control peripheral has a lot in common with the Nintendo Wii, leading many to fear the PS3 is about to be inundated with crappy Wii ports.

That would be a disaster for Sony, so thankfully the company is working actively with publishers to ensure that the first generation of Move games don't end up like most Wii games: namely, ill-advised waggle plastered atop a "regular" game.

"Our challenge here is to make sure you're doing it with the right games and the right genres", Sony's Rob Dyer told Gamasutra, "and that's where we're spending a lot of our time, going back to people and going", 'Good idea. Bad idea. Good idea. Yeah, not so good idea.'"

"Those are the types of things that we're trying to at least steer people away so they don't spend millions of dollars, come back to me and go, 'Eh... It didn't sell.' 'Well, okay. You never should have made it. It was never going to work anyway. It didn't work on the Wii for a reason. That category didn't. Why did you think it was going to work on this one as well?'"

That's the kind of cold-hearted pragmatism that can, above and beyond the raw specs of the Move, make or break the technology.


What exactly makes these guys the experts in motion controlled games anyways?  I mean where were these geniuses when Lair was being developed? 



Around the Network
Gilgamesh on 24 May 2010
RolStoppable said:
Gilgamesh said:

Wait, but the Wii has a different audience then the PS3. If the PS3 had games like The Conduit or Madworld it would more then likely sell much better then the Wii version.

I didn't expect this coming from you. I am known to troll the PS3, but I probably wouldn't dare to say that its owners have lower quality standards than Wii owners.

I thought The Conduit and Madworld was suppose to be high quality games that bombed on the Wii because of it's audience?

I'm just saying thery're a hardcore game so if you put it on a hardcore console wouldn't it sell?



patjuan32 on 24 May 2010
joeorc said:
patjuan32 said:
joeorc said:
patjuan32 said:
joeorc said:
Naum said:
So they will do what Nintendo did during the Snes/N64 era... look what that did.

yup make some awsome game's and guess what the fact that Sony is already in 3rd . so why the hell does it matter now anyway. Quality is a good thing if you ask me. it's not about catching the Wii, Sony's going for quality. why worry about placement in a console war when your already 3rd!

If Sony was not worried about their placement in the console war then they'd focus on developing games for the audience that they are competing for. Instead they want to introduce the move to attract the mainstream audience to the PS3 to improve sales and thus change the Placement of the PS3 in the console wars.

o'l come on now just because the market leader has something unique does not mean that one of the other's would not add it if they could, now would you have not seen their technology added if the Wii did not take off?

the fact that Sony waited because they got burned in the past with motion control's they put out the Eyetoy and 3rd party's did not support it like they said they would.

so what if they added it later, atleat they combined it's use with the EYETOY to give it more function's.

Many consumer's are very happy with motion control's for gaming, now Sony has added that option to the PS3.

unless Only Nintendo can have that technology?

 

Sony and Microsoft jump on the motion control band wagon after the Wii became successful. They both came out against motion controls in interviews and look now. This has nothing to do with copying the Uniquess of the market leader and everything to do with sales. I could go on but some of your comments make you sound like a bitter Fanboy.

bitter fanboy..lol

AND ONCE AGAIN SO WHAT IF THEY DID!

and PR matter's why?

just because some PR speak is put out does not mean what they stated was every thing they may plan on doing!

alot of PR is just trying to hurt on the other's sale's. the fact that.

calling someone a bitter fanboy it just seem's to me if anyone is bitter it's the people who try to make out PR as some sort of past truth to keep bring up when they want to keep trying to discourage or downplay any an all thing's about another system because of some slight toward a system they have a preference for

sort of like some PR.. speak we have heard before. so in effect your doing exactly the same thing you are mad about!

"unless Only Nintendo can have that technology?" confirms that you sound like a bitter fanboy. That comment had no place in the discussion what so ever.

"AND ONCE AGAIN SO WHAT IF THEY DID!" You are the one defending their every move and that quote makes your arguments pointless.

Good day sir.

 



If Nintendo is successful at the moment, it’s because they are good, and I cannot blame them for that. What we should do is try to be just as good.----Laurent Benadiba

 

dirkd2323 on 24 May 2010

don't get your panes in a bunch people !!!



Metallicube on 24 May 2010

It's too bad the Wii had to be the guinea pig in this, but at least Sony recognizes that it is the GAME that causes low sales, NOT the consumer base.



joeorc on 24 May 2010
patjuan32 said:
joeorc said:
patjuan32 said:
joeorc said:
patjuan32 said:
joeorc said:
Naum said:
So they will do what Nintendo did during the Snes/N64 era... look what that did.

yup make some awsome game's and guess what the fact that Sony is already in 3rd . so why the hell does it matter now anyway. Quality is a good thing if you ask me. it's not about catching the Wii, Sony's going for quality. why worry about placement in a console war when your already 3rd!

If Sony was not worried about their placement in the console war then they'd focus on developing games for the audience that they are competing for. Instead they want to introduce the move to attract the mainstream audience to the PS3 to improve sales and thus change the Placement of the PS3 in the console wars.

o'l come on now just because the market leader has something unique does not mean that one of the other's would not add it if they could, now would you have not seen their technology added if the Wii did not take off?

the fact that Sony waited because they got burned in the past with motion control's they put out the Eyetoy and 3rd party's did not support it like they said they would.

so what if they added it later, atleat they combined it's use with the EYETOY to give it more function's.

Many consumer's are very happy with motion control's for gaming, now Sony has added that option to the PS3.

unless Only Nintendo can have that technology?

 

Sony and Microsoft jump on the motion control band wagon after the Wii became successful. They both came out against motion controls in interviews and look now. This has nothing to do with copying the Uniquess of the market leader and everything to do with sales. I could go on but some of your comments make you sound like a bitter Fanboy.

bitter fanboy..lol

AND ONCE AGAIN SO WHAT IF THEY DID!

and PR matter's why?

just because some PR speak is put out does not mean what they stated was every thing they may plan on doing!

alot of PR is just trying to hurt on the other's sale's. the fact that.

calling someone a bitter fanboy it just seem's to me if anyone is bitter it's the people who try to make out PR as some sort of past truth to keep bring up when they want to keep trying to discourage or downplay any an all thing's about another system because of some slight toward a system they have a preference for

sort of like some PR.. speak we have heard before. so in effect your doing exactly the same thing you are mad about!

"unless Only Nintendo can have that technology?" confirms that you sound like a bitter fanboy. That comment had no place in the discussion what so ever.

"AND ONCE AGAIN SO WHAT IF THEY DID!" You are the one defending their every move and that quote makes your arguments pointless.

Good day sir.

 

lol. how am i defending it there is nothing to defend it does not even have to be defended. just so you can say "what we were first with it everyone else is a copy cat"?

so what if everyone is a percieved copycat.

please/

if anything it seem's no one can be happy unless other's feel upset over it as much as that person feel's.

I am not happy so you can't be happy...

 



I AM BOLO

100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...

ps:

Proud psOne/2/3/p owner.  I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.