By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Sony: If It Didn't Work On Wii, Don't Try It On Move

Carl2291 said:
Cheebee said:

Sure, that's why they're coming out with that sports minigame compilation?

Well... The best "selling" game on Wii is a sports minigame collection so...

Yeah, Wii Sports has become a phenomenon. It was the original, and a Nintendo 1st party game at that. But I was referring to the truckloads of clones and copies that bombed, it's been done to death by now.



Nintendo Network ID: Cheebee   3DS Code: 2320 - 6113 - 9046

 

Around the Network
peachbuggy said:
Won't this attitude make the move peripheral be perceived even more like the Wii in that situation? Surely it will because, as already mentioned in this thread the games which specifically don't work/sell on the Wii are the hardcore type games. Surely Sony should be trying to differentiate their new control scheme from the Wii by it doing different(see, hardcore) types of games. By discouraging this type of thing on Move then surely 3rd parties will just bring out what they perceived to work on the Wii. Which means mini game compilations and so- called shovelware. It seems to me Sony are saying :- Don't bring games to our platform that won't sell. Not:- Don't bring bad games to our system. Unfortunately these are two different things.

and why would it be a bad thing if 3rd party developer's that already make game's for the Wii know that their game will work on the PS3. except for one key factor the PS3 has the EYETOY that can add abilities that the Wii does not get. so one it help's secure 3rd party developer's toward making multiplatform that would of been only on Wii to now that they could make the game also for the PS3.

with of course add function in the game not found on the Wii..Maybe some augmented reality function but still an added function that would not be on the Wii ver.

with DLC being done that way on game's anymore this would not be a suprise if this is going the same route.

 



I AM BOLO

100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...

ps:

Proud psOne/2/3/p owner.  I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.

curl-6 said:
joeorc said:
Naum said:
So they will do what Nintendo did during the Snes/N64 era... look what that did.

yup make some awsome game's and guess what the fact that Sony is already in 3rd . why worry about placement in a console war when your already 3rd!

Because they want to retake 2nd, and even 1st if possible.

the point is Sony has already sold over 33+ million system's world wide on the PS3 and many still consider that a flop. so why worry about it since right now their making a profit on each PS3 sold and even though their in 3rd they are still getting the majority of the 3rd party support!

at this point it's not about the short race it's alway's been about the long haul. so why worry about the short part of the race?



I AM BOLO

100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...

ps:

Proud psOne/2/3/p owner.  I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.

joeorc said:
Naum said:
So they will do what Nintendo did during the Snes/N64 era... look what that did.

yup make some awsome game's and guess what the fact that Sony is already in 3rd . so why the hell does it matter now anyway. Quality is a good thing if you ask me. it's not about catching the Wii, Sony's going for quality. why worry about placement in a console war when your already 3rd!

If Sony was not worried about their placement in the console war then they'd focus on developing games for the audience that they are competing for. Instead they want to introduce the move to attract the mainstream audience to the PS3 to improve sales and thus change the Placement of the PS3 in the console wars.



If Nintendo is successful at the moment, it’s because they are good, and I cannot blame them for that. What we should do is try to be just as good.----Laurent Benadiba

 

2 bucks that the people hating WiiSports are suddenly in love with Move"sports"



Around the Network
patjuan32 said:
joeorc said:
Naum said:
So they will do what Nintendo did during the Snes/N64 era... look what that did.

yup make some awsome game's and guess what the fact that Sony is already in 3rd . so why the hell does it matter now anyway. Quality is a good thing if you ask me. it's not about catching the Wii, Sony's going for quality. why worry about placement in a console war when your already 3rd!

If Sony was not worried about their placement in the console war then they'd focus on developing games for the audience that they are competing for. Instead they want to introduce the move to attract the mainstream audience to the PS3 to improve sales and thus change the Placement of the PS3 in the console wars.

o'l come on now just because the market leader has something unique does not mean that one of the other's would not add it if they could, now would you have not seen their technology added if the Wii did not take off?

the fact that Sony waited because they got burned in the past with motion control's they put out the Eyetoy and 3rd party's did not support it like they said they would.

so what if they added it later, atleat they combined it's use with the EYETOY to give it more function's.

Many consumer's are very happy with motion control's for gaming, now Sony has added that option to the PS3.

unless Only Nintendo can have that technology?

 



I AM BOLO

100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...

ps:

Proud psOne/2/3/p owner.  I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.

Galaki said:
2 bucks that the people hating WiiSports are suddenly in love with Move"sports"

so what if they did, maybe just maybe the Wii's function for the control was not good enough for their gaming taste's.

I think its great some gamer's view game's as copy's when they have yet to play the game!/sarcasm

 



I AM BOLO

100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...

ps:

Proud psOne/2/3/p owner.  I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.

joeorc said:
patjuan32 said:
joeorc said:
Naum said:
So they will do what Nintendo did during the Snes/N64 era... look what that did.

yup make some awsome game's and guess what the fact that Sony is already in 3rd . so why the hell does it matter now anyway. Quality is a good thing if you ask me. it's not about catching the Wii, Sony's going for quality. why worry about placement in a console war when your already 3rd!

If Sony was not worried about their placement in the console war then they'd focus on developing games for the audience that they are competing for. Instead they want to introduce the move to attract the mainstream audience to the PS3 to improve sales and thus change the Placement of the PS3 in the console wars.

o'l come on now just because the market leader has something unique does not mean that one of the other's would not add it if they could, now would you have not seen their technology added if the Wii did not take off?

the fact that Sony waited because they got burned in the past with motion control's they put out the Eyetoy and 3rd party's did not support it like they said they would.

so what if they added it later, atleat they combined it's use with the EYETOY to give it more function's.

Many consumer's are very happy with motion control's for gaming, now Sony has added that option to the PS3.

unless Only Nintendo can have that technology?

 

Sony and Microsoft jump on the motion control band wagon after the Wii became successful. They both came out against motion controls in interviews and look now. This has nothing to do with copying the Uniquess of the market leader and everything to do with sales. I could go on but some of your comments make you sound like a bitter Fanboy.



If Nintendo is successful at the moment, it’s because they are good, and I cannot blame them for that. What we should do is try to be just as good.----Laurent Benadiba

 

thats very very great news, i was really disappointed at how many crappy third party games on Wii... i've never seen a console have that much, heck even very liked games such as Mad World and Red Steel 2 are totally crappy, i think for Wii its first Party or no party (no pun intended)



I live for the burn...and the sting of pleasure...
I live for the sword, the steel, and the gun...

- Wasteland - The Mission.

curl-6 said:
gamings_best said:
 

now here's the deal breaker with the ps2, pull up the top 20 selling games on the ps2 and wii, one survives off of shovelware.....and one just has shovelware.


There is only 1 shovelware title, Carnival Games, in the Wii's top 20. The Wii survives (and thrives) on several factors, primarily first part shovelware and appeal to the expanded audience, and shovelware is most of it.

And Everybody's Golf 3 made the shortlist of best selling PS2 games...

 

Shovelware is not a Wii-specific phenomenon. Heck, the Atari 2600 and NES had vastly more shovelware yet everyone remembers them as classics because they also had great titles to offer, as does the Wii.

*fixed*

that is unless you consider wii play, wii sports, wii fit, wii sports resort, etc, NOT shovelware in which case we really have nothing to discuss..

shovelware is shovelware, I could careless who makes it.