I picked up the first issue of Dave Halverson's new magazine Gamefan (successor to his Die Hard Gamefan, probably the best USA gaming mag of the 16 through 32 bit era, Play Magazine, which was published last gen and for a great part of this gen, and the Girls of Gaming and Anime special companion issues to Play magazines) a couple of days ago.

While reading through Matt Cabral's review for Heavy Rain, I came across this passage:
"But, before I get too emo on you, I'll say it's not only a girl's gaze or a character's reflection in a puddle that'll move you in Heavy Rain; you'll also be rocked by the best new backside in gaming -- sorry, Chloe (JAS84: what game is Chloe in?), Bayonetta, and Sheva, but Madison's posterior polygons take the crown."

Is this an accurate description? Are Madison in Heavy Rain's posterior polygons the best in gaming?

I lost interest to a degree in Heavy Rain because I saw some pictures of Madison, and I don't like women with short hair. However, if she truely has the best backside in gaming, that could raise my interest (pardon the pun) in the game once again.

No... someone needs to get laid more often..

he needs to see real women naked....

Wow.... so if that is all that drives you to games, maybe I should introduce you to my friend "Google" and his/her many methods of searching for porn :p

lol funny thread.

It's hard between the Heavy Rain chick and the Uncharted 2 chick.

I guess some folks, not counting Slimebeast, aren't mature enough to have acquired an aesthetic appreciation of the female form.

The best part of the Girls of Gaming mags, other than the pictures and bringing up wonderful retro gaming hotties, was the insight they gave into the creative processes that led some of the best artistic designers in gaming to design their characters as they did.

As a certified bootyologist, I have to agree. Madison does take the crown for most realistic butt. Too bad she looks like a "dirty" person. Definitely not hot.

Certified.

What do you mean by 'dirty person' and 'not hot' in the same sentence? Are those things mutually exclusive?

She looks "dirty" as in the kind of person I wouldn't want cooking my dinner.  Definitely not clean.  I mean she gave it up to a guy with a freshly cut off finger, burns and bandages all over his body, and a possible mental disorder.  On top of that, she'd just met the guy!  She does look realistic but I wouldn't want to try it.