No game has ever killed the title it was sent out to surpass.
Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. " thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."
No game has ever killed the title it was sent out to surpass.
Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. " thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."
CGI-Quality said:
Our debate has already been resolved (via PM), so I'm not going over it again. I know you have a knack for attacking me when I defend Microsoft or Nintendo but let this one die. You also don't always have to be so condescending and/or snobby when debating/posting. And btw, I hope you plan to attack everyone else in this thread who's comments virtually mirror mine. Something tells me my hope will probably be crushed though |
Fortunately, no one else came in with an agenda to defend the Halo franchise from an insult that never existed in the first place, so I don't need to "attack" anybody else. You were certainly the only one to try to paint EA's words as out-of-line instead of recognising it for the PR that it is, so your suggestion that there were plenty of other posters in this thread with comments "virtually mirroring" yours is hilarious.
SmoothCriminal said:
Halo was a HUGE ripoff of Ender's Game (the best book ever written IMO).
That doesn't really make it generic, but it does make it a copycat. |
Say what??
Let's see, child prodigy is recruited at a very young age to command a fleet of spaceships = lone soldier crashes on mysterious space station capable of destroying all sentient life in the galaxy...
I'm sorry, but that seems like a bit of a stretch to me.

themanwithnoname said:
|
have you thought of the fact he might have been banned for calling X game generic trash in the games natural forum? I'd expect to be warned or banned for calling a microsoft game that in the microsoft forums, but since this is the general gaming forums there is a touch more room for opinion.


| Carl2291 said: Anyone want a bet? Halo: Reach will sell more in its first month, than Crysis 2 in it's lifetime. |
sales vs quality doesnt really work in this situation. One could say Halo ODST sold more in a lifetime then most FPSs on the market. Does that mean ODST is actually a quality product? no really.


ssj12 said:
have you thought of the fact he might have been banned for calling X game generic trash in the games natural forum? I'd expect to be warned or banned for calling a microsoft game that in the microsoft forums, but since this is the general gaming forums there is a touch more room for opinion. |
Correct this is the general gaming forum. We should be able to give our opinions on all games that are related to OP and on topic whether it's negative within reason of course which yours was or be it positive. Just like I did but I suppose I wasn't called out for it because it's a the more popular viewpoint.
The only true Halo killer would be MS deciding to never use the IP again.
Tho I bet Crysis will look better. Crysis is an OK game that looks amazing. Thats about it.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!
Halo Killer my arse!!! If Crysis 2 has split screen then I'll consider. Until then. Talk whatever you want EA.

Halo killer? In quality and fun? No. In sales? No, not even close. I mean, I'm not a huge Halo fan (I loved the second one though) but Crysis (and Warhead, which I know wasn't crytek) were utter shit imo so Crysis 2 will only kill its dignity following in the wake of this bold announcement.
Halo reach so far is shaping up to be a cut above the rest in the MP department. Will have to wait and see what crysis and blackops have to offer, but it's not looking good for the competition.