The Wii has had a remarkable record of producing "evergreen" titles. These titles keep selling like clockwork. I am curious if the Wii NOT competing on graphics has been a reason why this is so. With the PS3 and 360, it is like an arms race of supposedly one upping one another in the graphics front. This means that the next version of a game has to do outdo the last, particularly in graphics. The buyers are supposed to want next gen, so these systems have franchises with multiple updated versions selling annually, and topping the last. Also included are flagship exclusives that have to top the last. The end result is the latest = hottest, and old stuff getting ignored, and a big burst of early sales.
Now contrast that with Mario Kart, or Wii Fit, or Super Mario Bros. Wii. I am not sure anyone who has a Wii expects that some other game would come out and have better graphics, or you are blown away later by better graphics. What you have is a game that would likely be at the top of its game in looks. I would likely say also Super Mario Galaxy 2 would likely add more features at most, and not really be that much better than the original Super Mario Galaxy.
Anyone else have any thoughts on this? Does the Wii competing on other things besides "better looks" help it get longer sales out of its franchise titles?
















