It is easy ...

All devs like to make games they want to play and a lot of them are what some would call graphic whores, sadly for you but most of them are possible X360/PS3 games fans.  Who love Mass Effect,Gears of war, God of war, Uncharted, Halo... 

The best that can happen as dev is that people love your games and not how much money you made with it (their are ofcourse exceptions).

there you go just so you notice it better.

Dissidia is a spin off if you don't know btw, and a new IP.

Crystal Chronicles is old , and Crystal Chronicles on Gamecube probably sold better

The main difference between this gen and last gen is that the market leader followed a Blue Ocean Strategy while everyone else was content with competing for known, established customer bases. Also, genres became bigger such as WRPG's, FPS's, party titles, and TPS's and other genres became smaller such as JRPG's and RTS's. Another change is that new strategies for distributing content became the norm, such as downloadable games and other DLC. SKU's became more prevalent. The Japanese market shrunk, the European markets grew. The adaption of new technologies were mixed, Motion Controls were adopted more quickly than Blu-Ray.

eh, I'm too lazy to write anymore.

FF13 is selling decently on the PS3 just because many bought their PS3s just to play it and Versus/14, which would explain the firestorm across the internet when the multiplat version was announced. The reason SE made it multiplat was because they realized there was an untapped fanbase within the 360 crowd which they could reach cheaply. So the only thing that was going through SE's mind is how to make more profit from their product. Which is pretty normal for a company.

However, the PS3's major issue was the pricing at the beginning. They could of rolled that wave from the PS2 fanboys, but ended up making a system that was out of the budget of most gamers. Many didn't feel like paying that much money for a system that was barely being supported at the time, considering the difficulty of how hard it is to work with the system. Pricing is a make or break in the industry of any product today, and you're seeing a massive deadweight loss because of it. The Wii, on the otherhand as much as I hate to admit it, was tapping into unused resources, IE the casual fanbase. They made everyone out of the general demographical ages of gamers, which is 18 -25 year old males in target audience, get interested in a system so simplistic and yet satisfying that they could even do it. They don't care about trends, or what people say on the internet, or how good a game is based on standards, as long as they enjoy it. It was so easy and simplistic that now Microsoft and Sony are jumping on that boat just to see if they can do it too.

wat are you taalking about?

"Yes,it was at that time".............................that time,we are in 2010 and PS2 is the most succesful.PS2 being so succesfull didn't help the PS3.

and no it doesn't make all the difference,even if Gamecube was a hit Wii would have still been without 3rd party cause Nintendo's fanbase and crowd is totally different.Also Nintendo likes to promote their products with their own line of games,thats why other publishers games aren't succesful

I can understand betting on the wrong horse in 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, why are still betting in 2010 ?

Unless the horse is winning some races as well.