By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Are you impressed? Best looking shooter Ive seen yet

Faxanadu on 26 November 2007

nice, a film noir FPS



Any message from Faxanadu is written in good faith but shall neither be binding nor construed as constituting a commitment by Faxanadu except where provided for in a written agreement signed by an authorized representative of Faxanadu. This message is intended for the use of the forum members only.

The views expressed here may be personal and/or offensive and are not necessarily the views of Faxanadu.

Around the Network
Dallinor on 26 November 2007

The screenshots here aren't even the best screenshots, they're just some rarely seen ones a poster on GT found. You need to see it in action to do the game any justice.



 

Timmah! on 26 November 2007
leo-j said:
Timmah! said:
Duckaluck said:
I have a question, has anyone accually played Crysis, with no hitches or graphical problems? I find it hard to believe that there are so many people that have the maximum requirements to play this game.

I think the comparison here is from screenshots and videos, not that everyone commenting has played Crysis. Isn't that what this thread referenced from the beginning? Screenshots?

I've compared screenshots and videos side by side, and I think Crysis looks waaaay better. I also have a good friend with a quad core, 4GB RAM, and dual Gefoce8800's PC, so I'll get to see it in action soon.


Dude like I said the graphcis card and ram arent the only thing that matter when taking about graphics. Why da hell did this go to a crysis vs kz2 thing.

 

I forgot to put consoles in their.


If you're talking about consoles only, It's definitely up there graphics-wise from what I've seen. It seems on par with COD4 from screens and vids, but I'd have to see it in motion on an actual PS3 to really make that judgement. I still stand by what I say about most FPS's (not just KZ2) using waaaaaaay too much grey in the level design.



Vengi on 26 November 2007

Well I have a 8800GTS and it plays quite nicely on it, I would say from both a Tech graphical stand point Crysis looks better and it is also far more beautiful to look at, would you rather be in a lovely lush island or a grim grey city?
I imagine by the time KZ2 comes to PS3 most PC's will be able to play crysis :P

The obvious lack of turtles is extremely disappointing.



"..just keep on trying 'till you run out of cake"

azzer100 on 26 November 2007

Looks brilliant. Its a great pitty its on the PS3 tho. The PS3 has the worst pad for FPS. The left thumbstick is just in the wrong place :(

Altough why do people seem to get so excited about graphics. surely this type of graphics are expected on the PS3 anyway, arent they?



call me Aaronbunny!

Wii code: 6993 4542 2457 6182. plz add me Im a wiily gd friend

Around the Network
kn on 26 November 2007
Dallinor said:

The screenshots here aren't even the best screenshots, they're just some rarely seen ones a poster on GT found. You need to see it in action to do the game any justice.



^^^ That is sweet... Nice ragdoll physics going on there as you pump him full of rounds.

I hate trolls.

Systems I currently own:  360, PS3, Wii, DS Lite (2)
Systems I've owned: PS2, PS1, Dreamcast, Saturn, 3DO, Genesis, Gamecube, N64, SNES, NES, GBA, GB, C64, Amiga, Atari 2600 and 5200, Sega Game Gear, Vectrex, Intellivision, Pong.  Yes, Pong.

SleepWaking on 26 November 2007

what have you seen those textures there not really that good, cod4 looks way better.



Vengi on 26 November 2007
kn said:
Dallinor said:

The screenshots here aren't even the best screenshots, they're just some rarely seen ones a poster on GT found. You need to see it in action to do the game any justice.



^^^ That is sweet... Nice ragdoll physics going on there as you pump him full of rounds.

It does look quite impressive - for it's style type, but don't you think actually seeing the fluidic splashes of blood is just....overkill?



"..just keep on trying 'till you run out of cake"

leo-j on 26 November 2007
azzer100 said:
Looks brilliant. Its a great pitty its on the PS3 tho. The PS3 has the worst pad for FPS. The left thumbstick is just in the wrong place :(

Altough why do people seem to get so excited about graphics. surely this type of graphics are expected on the PS3 anyway, arent they?

Wrong the ps2 had the worst FPS controls. Resistance fixed that. Ask anyone who played it, the controls are perfect.



 

mM
kn on 26 November 2007
Dallinor said:
kn said:
The first three images aren't really in-game... Cut scenes perhaps?

No. They're all in-game.


Possibly you misunderstood me.... While thsoe scenes may be "rendered" by the in-game engine and not CGI, that matters not.  I wasn't commenting on the quality of graphics -- I was commenting on the fact that they are third person or "cut-scene" perspective and not what the game will look like when the player is fully "in control".  That wasn't a knock on the game by any means...   



I hate trolls.

Systems I currently own:  360, PS3, Wii, DS Lite (2)
Systems I've owned: PS2, PS1, Dreamcast, Saturn, 3DO, Genesis, Gamecube, N64, SNES, NES, GBA, GB, C64, Amiga, Atari 2600 and 5200, Sega Game Gear, Vectrex, Intellivision, Pong.  Yes, Pong.