Nah, OoT is greater than both.

@everyone: I don't understand all the love for WW.  Personally, I found the game to be really easy, and the quest for the Triforce shards to be lengthy, monotonous, and entirely unneeded. It was the epitome of fetch quests, but had it not been put in the game, it would've been far too short.  The quest was filler, nothing more, and when 1/4th to 1/3rd of a game is filler, there's a serious problem. 

Does anybody else feel the same way?

Complaining about fetch quests in Zelda games is like complaining about jumping in Mario games.

Well said Rol.

Can someone explain to me why they think it's a great game then? (just curious)

It was fun to play.

That's a given. 

So, why was it fun to play? 

Because it was a great game.  Duh.   

You guys are no help at all.

Btw, I'm not trying to say it wasn't a great game. It's still one of my favs and I'd gladly give it a 9.0+. I just think it falls short of other Zeldas, and I'm probably a bit harsh when I point that out.


New question: What is it about the game that puts it above the other zeldas?

The quest for the Triforce shards just really turned me off, I dunno. Having to sail around and pick up chests holding maps, occasionally venturing into circular dungeons that are all the same to kill some baddies and open more chests to get more maps, only to have to bring them all to Tingle and pay an assload of rupees to have him translate them for you. It just wasn't very fun, imo.  Edit: Wasn't very fun in comparison to other Zeldas.

lol joking aside I loved the sailing and huge world to explore with tons of sidequests and collectibles as well as the fresh and unique art style.  OoT is my favorite Zelda, but WW is a close second.

Aw, my favorite Zelda game is Link to the Past so I can't answer that question.