Some of you may be aware of British games blogger Bruce Everiss, who has occasionally popped up on this site to express his opinions (mainly on how Nintendo are going to fail and everyone other than Nintendo will succeed). Some commenters have mocked him for this - I know I have, several times. Still, that's what the Internet is for.
However, you may not be aware that for the last few months Bruce has been involved in a pretty serious legal battle with the makers of a browser game, Evony. Bruce did some investigating of the company behind Evony and found evidence that it was linked to gold-farming in China, and other details that Evony weren't too happy about. After Bruce posted these on his website, Evony hit him with a libel lawsuit - and for some reason chose to do so in Australia, even though none of the parties in the case have any connection to the country. It seems that this was a case of libel tourism, i.e. a company choosing to sue someone in a country with the most favourable libel laws from their point of view.
The case could have led to Bruce being hit not only with a claim for damages, but also huge legal bills (which tend to be the most dangerous part of being sued for libel). All credit to Bruce, however - he fought back and continued posting articles about Evony on his website, poking huge holes in their legal case.
The upshot is that two days after the case started, Evony's prosecution collapsed. The whole story is here on the Guardian in the UK. The fact that this is being picked up by a national newspaper gives an indication of how big a deal this is - this really was a threat to free speech on the Web. Imagine if you could be sued on the other side of the world in a country you've never had any contact with, no matter where you live, for a blog entry or a comment on a thread? Even if what you've written is true?
Anyway, you can send your congratulations to Bruce on his website, where you can also find details of Evony's unsavoury practices. He may come across as an obsessive or a troll at times, but on this point he was completely in the right.


















