By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Natal will “surprise you”, says Greenberg

Not really suprised until I see really good games



                                  

                                       That's Gordon Freeman in "Real-Life"
 

 

Around the Network
Severance said:
AbbathTheGrim said:

Coming from anyone's PR, be it Sony, Wii, or Microprofit, when I see the "an experience that all people be it young, old, male or female can enjoy" I can blindly put the "bullshit" tag right away.

Microprofit? that sound actually cool.

Sony should be called Sonoprofit, because they're not making any profit


Megaprofit would be better suited.



Severance said:
AbbathTheGrim said:

Coming from anyone's PR, be it Sony, Wii, or Microprofit, when I see the "an experience that all people be it young, old, male or female can enjoy" I can blindly put the "bullshit" tag right away.

Microprofit? that sound actually cool.

Sony should be called Sonoprofit, because they're not making any profit


Sad but true. XD



Nintendo is selling their IPs to Microsoft and this is true because:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=221391&page=1

Great the hype is getting better. I hope we see some more hit title announcement.



 

   PROUD MEMBER OF THE PLAYSTATION 3 : RPG FAN CLUB

 

I just hope that Natal can allow you to scan a controller that you can use to make playing the game easier. Now that would be a surprise.



Proud member of the SONIC SUPPORT SQUAD

Tag "Sorry man. Someone pissed in my Wheaties."

"There are like ten games a year that sell over a million units."  High Voltage CEO -  Eric Nofsinger

Around the Network

Hell, Apple surprised me at how bad they did with iPad. So, surprise me could be bad and good. Which is it MS? Are you going to surprise me with a horrific product full of false promise, or am I going to be dying to have this product?



we will see



Natal technology was rejected by both Nintendo and Sony for a reason. I highly doubt it's anything more than PR and dreams. The fact that we didn't see any game until now is striking.

The lag is huge and the lack of controller means it'll lack feedback too. As Kevin Butler puts it so well, buttons are needed for evrything except games involving a big red ball. ;)

I know I don't want to make "pew pew pew" with my fingers in front of my tv to simulate a gun...

Sony move or the Wiimote / nunchuk combo makes a lot more sense in my opinion and they have a lot more potential for games.



Brennan said:

Natal technology was rejected by both Nintendo and Sony for a reason. I highly doubt it's anything more than PR and dreams. The fact that we didn't see any game until now is striking.

The lag is huge and the lack of controller means it'll lack feedback too. As Kevin Butler puts it so well, buttons are needed for evrything except games involving a big red ball. ;)

I know I don't want to make "pew pew pew" with my fingers in front of my tv to simulate a gun...

Sony move or the Wiimote / nunchuk combo makes a lot more sense in my opinion and they have a lot more potential for games.

I think we should at least give Natal chance before passing judgment. Without even seeing any real games for it yet. why should it be criticized before the games are showed for it?



Brennan said:

Natal technology was rejected by both Nintendo and Sony for a reason. I highly doubt it's anything more than PR and dreams. The fact that we didn't see any game until now is striking.

The lag is huge and the lack of controller means it'll lack feedback too. As Kevin Butler puts it so well, buttons are needed for evrything except games involving a big red ball. ;)

I know I don't want to make "pew pew pew" with my fingers in front of my tv to simulate a gun...

Sony move or the Wiimote / nunchuk combo makes a lot more sense in my opinion and they have a lot more potential for games.

You know that fighting game Sony are showing in all their ads? Yeah you could do that on Natal, without having to get two controllers. So yeah buttons aren't always needed

Do you honestly think MS would invest a lot of money in this if they didn't have some software ideas? Not to say they will be good but honestly I'd be shocked if there wasn't at least one game that had at the very least a brilliant concept,