Bad Company 2 is better. Huge maps, awesome vehicular warfare, great graphics, great audio, fine weapon cutomizations, a great campaign, and amazing destruction and very realstic.

One Game is finished and the other is still in development with the PS3 as the lead console.

Dude...There is a colossal difference between Battlefield and Medal of Honor

Yes but Metro 2033 IS actually the same thing as Stalker. I mean COME ON, they're both set in Russia for crying out loud, and they play almost identically.

Maybe this will make more sense.

Tell me the difference of the different additives of Cocaine.

@Smooth

Just because they were both set in Russia hey are the same? They felt completely different, especially concerning how SALKER was more of an RPG minus the stats with shooting while Metro was a shooter minus the easy mode shoting with stealth and a smidge RPG gameplay. I also really don't remember a lot of stealth at all in STALKER.

Because whether you like it or not, cocaine is cocaine, and that's not an opinion, it's a fact. Whether youo like it or not FPSes this generatoins are all the same, just like cocaine is cocaine with whatever additive it has.

Now here is my question, why do you try to pass off a fact as an opinion?

Really? Really?

fact: a concept whose truth can be proved

opinioon: a personal belief or judgment that is not founded on proof or certainty

You can measure how similar games are and how different they are, therefore it is a fact. Now just because you think otherwise and at the same time don't want to think yourself as wrong, you try to pass it off as an opinion. Also keep in mind that there are such things as wrong opinions, such as people who held the opinion that the earth was flat back when it couldn't be verified, and their opinions were wrong. Just saying "oh it's my opinion" doesn't really mean shit, and really doesn't excuse people. It can be wrong, even if this subject isn't measureable and quantifiable, which it is, you can have a wrong opinion.

Except that only Resistance 2 and Killzone 2 ave come out this generation. Meanwhile Halo, FEAR, Half-Life 2, and especially 007, have all come otu during different stages.My calim was to FPSes the last several years, none of which you listed, very conveniently it would seem as well.

Also I don't know how much you have been playing but Killzone 2 and Resistance 2 feel extremely familar, at least that god-awful input lag of Killzone 2 and duck/lean system were there otherwise I could have sworn I was playing the same human vs alien in a gray/brown world with regenerating health where I can take 50 bullets and chill for 5 secs to remove saidt bullets game.

Perspective doesn't have aything to do with it, game mechanics do and in this geeration the differencec can be counted on your fingers between almost any 2 given FPS games. That's how you know when games are similar.

All FPS games are not the same.

Fact.

Halo is called Halo, Killzone is called Killzone ¬_¬

Killzone 2 has a cover mechanism... Halo 3 doesn't.

Modern Warfare is set in modern times. Call of Duty 2 isn't.

Fact.

I didn't stealth edit it, unless you mean an edit within 30 seconds for better clarity and spelling is somehow a stealth edit.

However I will concede that L4D is an original FPS, just like Metro 2033 and Portal. However I challenge you to list me 4 different FPS games that have significant differences between each other. I'm talking the difference between L4D and KZ2/R2/H3/etc. differences, not the none-existant differences between KZ2 and R2. Again it's not about how I felt, it's about how many gameplay differences there were, and the fact is I could probably count them on my findgers between those two games. I can bring in Halo 3 in as well and the difference between those 3 games is almost non-existant. Difference between CoD and those 3 is that instead of aliens it's other humans. I hop you get my drift.