More reviews came intoday and the average went back up, but not enough to take over OOT.
http://www.gamerankings.com/itemrankings/simpleratings.asp?rankings=y

I found this pretty comical.

This is the opening line from the gameshark review of SMG:

"Reviewing Super Mario Galaxy, in a way, is entirely unnecessary. For most, it's the only reason to own a Wii and purchasing it is required to validate having bought one in the first place. It's difficult to argue against the fact that the game is practically the only worthwhile title for Nintendo's system, joined by Metroid Prime 3: Corruption, Power Pros, and Super Paper Mario in a lackluster library. Unsurprisingly, Super Mario Galaxy delivers a stellar experience that finally justifies owning a Wii."

Anyone who liberally applies opinion as fact is clearly not a competent journalist.

...sometimes even reading the full review isn't worth a damn.

Wow, that's just .... wow.

I've noticed all the low reviews are poorly done and reek of irresponsible journalism, thid s person makes their bias clear from the outset, putting their entire review and score into heavy doubt

well ofcourse some reviewer was bound to drop the score,if happens to all the games now

 Yeah but the reviewer is clearly biased agains the Wii and its obvious that he isn't rating the game fairly, its one thing when its a quality review that knocks the score down, at least then it makes sense, in the case of SMG howerver we've seen that the low end reviews (the 90% reviews) are poorly done with obvious bias