| RolStoppable said: @joeorc I understand your main point: Just because Nintendo was first to the market doesn't mean that they were the only ones working on such technology. But there's something that puts a giant hole in your argument: the software. After all those years working on motion technology, the best games Sony could come up with are imitations of Nintendo hits and a not yet well functioning SOCOM 4 demo. This to me means that anything original that Sony had in the works was even worse than what we have seen. To Sony, copying Nintendo seemed like a better solution than anything they could come up with and that should make everyone question how far along Sony was with their technology and games for it in the first place. |
HOW so:
the people that developed the hardware put the tool's out. it upto developer's to do that software, that does not mean that noone when designing software would not come up with the same idea.
so what kind of software come's to mind for motion controll's?
would bowling be a good idea.
pong?
boxing?
combine the game pain with the TV show the HOLE?
it's like you don't have to ignore common sense here the idea that hey would that be a very common application for the controller!
bow and arrow
racing wheel wit two remotes to simulate the wheel, kid's have been doing that ever since kid's have dreamed of winning that soap box durby with out the racer, jut the box no wheel's, pretend steering wheel.
it's old concept's with new flash.

I AM BOLO
100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...
ps:
Proud psOne/2/3/p owner. I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.









