By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Pokemon HeartGold/SoulSilver beat Pokemon Diamond/Pearl/Platinum

On MetaCritic, although it is arguably too early to tell because not all of the reviews are in due to late reviewers. Pokemon HeartGold/SoulSilver has scored a solid 89 overall, while Pokemon Diamond/Pearl scored an 85 overall.

Nonetheless I am proud to say you can expect HeartGold and SoulSilver to be better games than they already great games Diamond, Pearl, and Platinum.

http://www.metacritic.com/games/ds/scores/

 

 



Around the Network

Metacritic is not absolute when defining which game is better or not.



Maneco's Hall of Lame
As of October 2010 and, hopefully, until the end of times

4.3

4.6

6

6.8

7
Notable Mentions (a.k.a. "Games I Played and Hated")

The Legend of Zelda:
Ocarina of Time

Pokémon Channel

Sonic Riders: Zero Gravity
Maneco said:
Metacritic is not absolute when defining which game is better or not.

True but you can still expect the game to be better because it accumulates all of the reviewers score into an overall which makes for an accurate assumption of how good the game might be.



Reviews don't matter. OF course this game will be better than Diamond and pearl. It's Gold and Silver remakes. Best pokemon games ever!!!!



Yeah, quite accurate...

However, we expect it to better and seems to be better, but you must stop assuming Metacritic is what will make people buy the game or not.



Maneco's Hall of Lame
As of October 2010 and, hopefully, until the end of times

4.3

4.6

6

6.8

7
Notable Mentions (a.k.a. "Games I Played and Hated")

The Legend of Zelda:
Ocarina of Time

Pokémon Channel

Sonic Riders: Zero Gravity
Around the Network
Maneco said:

Yeah, quite accurate...

However, we expect it to better and seems to be better, but you must stop assuming Metacritic is what will make people buy the game or not.

Whats wrong with a 94 for MW2, that is a fair review for one of the best multi-player experiences to date.

But I do see what you're saying.