By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - PS3 vs Xbox 360 is just a front in the real Live vs PSN war.

Hus said:
ALL that is far to complicated to the average consumer and wont matter to any one not a tech genius. Live or PSN wont ever matter to any one when choosing a tv. Unless it can some how cut the price by half no one will care.

There really is no big war as you claim since both are getting their ass's handed to them by Apple.

I remember when everyone was getting their asses handed to them by AOL, by EA etc... change does happen.

Its important because Live and PSN revenue combined are probably over $4B so far and growing every year.



Do you know what its like to live on the far side of Uranus?

Around the Network
Twistedpixel said:
Hus said:
ALL that is far to complicated to the average consumer and wont matter to any one not a tech genius. Live or PSN wont ever matter to any one when choosing a tv. Unless it can some how cut the price by half no one will care.

There really is no big war as you claim since both are getting their ass's handed to them by Apple.

I remember when everyone was getting their asses handed to them by AOL, by EA etc... change does happen.

Its important because Live and PSN revenue combined are probably over $4B so far and growing every year.

Apple is already above $4b a year on iTunes alone.



Anyone can guess. It takes no effort to throw out lots of predictions and have some of them be correct. You are not and wiser or better for having your guesses be right. Even a blind man can hit the bullseye.

Twistedpixel said:
Hus said:
ALL that is far to complicated to the average consumer and wont matter to any one not a tech genius. Live or PSN wont ever matter to any one when choosing a tv. Unless it can some how cut the price by half no one will care.

There really is no big war as you claim since both are getting their ass's handed to them by Apple.

I remember when everyone was getting their asses handed to them by AOL, by EA etc... change does happen.

Its important because Live and PSN revenue combined are probably over $4B so far and growing every year.

Yahh but Apple is not run by the same type of idiots that ran thsoe two into the ground, i hope. 



Grimes said:
Twistedpixel said:
Hus said:
ALL that is far to complicated to the average consumer and wont matter to any one not a tech genius. Live or PSN wont ever matter to any one when choosing a tv. Unless it can some how cut the price by half no one will care.

There really is no big war as you claim since both are getting their ass's handed to them by Apple.

I remember when everyone was getting their asses handed to them by AOL, by EA etc... change does happen.

Its important because Live and PSN revenue combined are probably over $4B so far and growing every year.

Apple is already above $4b a year on iTunes alone.

Apple doesn't have a console and their service is a mature service, im talking about maturing competitors.

Edit: In addition to this the scope of their potential is limited to the limited numbers of Mac and Ipod/phone/touch units they can sell and they are facing increased competition so they aren't as likely to grow in revenue nearly as quickly as either PSN or Live.



Do you know what its like to live on the far side of Uranus?

Twistedpixel said:
Grimes said:
Twistedpixel said:
Hus said:
ALL that is far to complicated to the average consumer and wont matter to any one not a tech genius. Live or PSN wont ever matter to any one when choosing a tv. Unless it can some how cut the price by half no one will care.

There really is no big war as you claim since both are getting their ass's handed to them by Apple.

I remember when everyone was getting their asses handed to them by AOL, by EA etc... change does happen.

Its important because Live and PSN revenue combined are probably over $4B so far and growing every year.

Apple is already above $4b a year on iTunes alone.

Apple doesn't have a console and their service is a mature service, im talking about maturing competitors.

Define mature. Apple has an integrated system with apps/game, video and music. Just because they don't have game first platform doesn't mean they aren't mature.

You don't think they can grow in revenue? With the addition of the iPad, it's possible for them to grow into the space previously held by print media. It's a huge market that has barely been touched.



Anyone can guess. It takes no effort to throw out lots of predictions and have some of them be correct. You are not and wiser or better for having your guesses be right. Even a blind man can hit the bullseye.

Around the Network
Twistedpixel said:

Microsoft has:

  • Xbox Live -
  • Windows mobile 7 live integration (coming soon)
  • Games for Windows Live (yes its sucky but they are trying)
  • Live Pass (Messenger, some websites)
  • Zune Video service
  • Office Live (coming soon)

 

Sony has:

 

  • PSN on PS3
  • PSN on PSP
  • PSN on TVs (coming soon)
  • PSN on VAIO computers (coming soon)
  • PSN on phones (coming soon)
  • PSN on cameras/misc electronics (expected)

 

 

Only things of relevance are Live on xbox and PSN on PS, both heavly tied to gaming.

The rest is honestly irrelevent.  I dont care at all about PSN on anything but a gaming platform, and i'm a Sony fan.  Why would the average consumer ever care ?

 

 



Grimes said:
Twistedpixel said:

Apple doesn't have a console and their service is a mature service, im talking about maturing competitors.

Define mature. Apple has an integrated system with apps/game, video and music. Just because they don't have game first platform doesn't mean they aren't mature.

You don't think they can grow in revenue? With the addition of the iPad, it's possible for them to grow into the space previously held by print media. It's a huge market that has barely been touched.

I said they were more mature but I thought their growth potential was more limited.

As far as the iPad is concerned, they haven't set the world on fire there and their initial foray doesn't have the same level of implementation that their amazing iPhone/iPods had reletive to the competition. The Courier, Slate and other reader combinations are even better implementations in some ways.



Do you know what its like to live on the far side of Uranus?

Hus said:
Twistedpixel said:

Microsoft has:

  • Xbox Live -
  • Windows mobile 7 live integration (coming soon)
  • Games for Windows Live (yes its sucky but they are trying)
  • Live Pass (Messenger, some websites)
  • Zune Video service
  • Office Live (coming soon)

 

Sony has:

 

  • PSN on PS3
  • PSN on PSP
  • PSN on TVs (coming soon)
  • PSN on VAIO computers (coming soon)
  • PSN on phones (coming soon)
  • PSN on cameras/misc electronics (expected)

 

 

Only things of relevance are Live on xbox and PSN on PS, both heavly tied to gaming.

The rest is honestly irrelevent.  I dont care at all about PSN on anything but a gaming platform, and i'm a Sony fan.  Why would the average consumer ever care ?

 

 

The fact that you don't care doesn't matter really. Gaming is just one avenue for these services. The average consumer wants convenience, portability and transportability.



Do you know what its like to live on the far side of Uranus?

Twistedpixel said:
Grimes said:
Twistedpixel said:

Apple doesn't have a console and their service is a mature service, im talking about maturing competitors.

Define mature. Apple has an integrated system with apps/game, video and music. Just because they don't have game first platform doesn't mean they aren't mature.

You don't think they can grow in revenue? With the addition of the iPad, it's possible for them to grow into the space previously held by print media. It's a huge market that has barely been touched.

I said they were more mature but I thought their growth potential was more limited.

As far as the iPad is concerned, they haven't set the world on fire there and their initial foray doesn't have the same level of implementation that their amazing iPhone/iPods had reletive to the competition. The Courier, Slate and other reader combinations are even better implementations in some ways.

 

The iPod/iPhone/iMac were all doubted just like you're doubting the iPad. Go back to the archives and there was nearly identical criticisms. I'm not saying that the criticisms aren't valid, but Apple has a way triumphing despite all of it.

I'm not saying Apple will dominate, but you have to be silly to say they aren't one of the major forces in networked services.



Anyone can guess. It takes no effort to throw out lots of predictions and have some of them be correct. You are not and wiser or better for having your guesses be right. Even a blind man can hit the bullseye.

Twistedpixel said:

The fact that you don't care doesn't matter really. Gaming is just one avenue for these services. The average consumer wants convenience, portability and transportability.

It does matter, if they can't get a gamer like me to care about their games service coming to other plaforms how will they get some chick of the street to give up her iphone ?  Gaming is a sure bet for thsoe services, everything else is not.  Mostof those other things are pointless.   

Yes yes yes, and Andriod or Apple are much better at that.

 

Its not a war between PSN Live, its more a struggle for survival.