By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Forget 7 - EDGE given FFXIII a 5!

numonex said:
Edge give games scores based on the game play and fun factor that they experience. I guess they care very little for games with excellent graphics which covers up for mediocre game play. FFXIII is a prime example of that it has great graphics on the exterior but the interior its gameplay is very mediocre. The game has been made easier to attract more people to play it. You have the option to auto battle in this game, let the game play itself. What is the point of that?

FFXIII is more or less a sequel to FFXII. FF games have been rehashed and SE made this game worse than previous FF games. The XBox 360 version of FFXIII was completed within 12 months.

FFXIII (PS3) 81 on metacritic based on 18 reviews. FFXIII (360) 87 on metacritic based on 6 reviews. FFXIII for either PS3 or 360 will be lucky to stay above 80 on metacritic. Lowest rated main series FF game of all time!!!

New Super Mario Bros. Wii - 70

Mario Kart Wii - 60

YES that's clearly the case. If you are trying to defend EDGE, atleast use valid arguments, if it was about fun factor, those games above would score through the roof.

EDGE has a very weired scoring system, they doesn't have any consistency or logic implied to it. Average games are getting 9's, while other arguably better ones are getting 6's and 7's.



MY HYPE LIST: 1) Gran Turismo 5; 2) Civilization V; 3) Starcraft II; 4) The Last Guardian; 5) Metal Gear Solid: Rising

Around the Network
perpride said:
Wagram said:
perpride said:
numonex said:
Edge give games scores based on the game play and fun factor that they experience. I guess they care very little for games with excellent graphics which covers up for mediocre game play. FFXIII is a prime example of that it has great graphics on the exterior but the interior its gameplay is very mediocre. The game has been made easier to attract more people to play it. You have the option to auto battle in this game, let the game play itself. What is the point of that?

FFXIII is more or less a sequel to FFXII. FF games have been rehashed and SE made this game worse than previous FF games. The XBox 360 version of FFXIII was completed within 12 months.

FFXIII (PS3) 81 on metacritic based on 18 reviews. FFXIII (360) 87 on metacritic based on 6 reviews. FFXIII for either PS3 or 360 will be lucky to stay above 80 on metacritic. Lowest rated main series FF game of all time!!!

You haven't even played the game...so how could you know anything about its gameplay?

He's canceled over 100 FF13 pre-orders! Damn he must be rollin on dough!

lol. It's funny, cause I have played the game. And if anyone else in the thread had played the game they would know that the auto battle will get you killed in five seconds.

I hear that the first few hours are pretty damn simple. But then after a certain point the game gets really hard if you don't get in gear.



Reasonable said:
Wagram said:
It's funny how Edge is so strong on games that have a lack of originality but then give FPS games 9+ scores. Hypocrites.

Their consistency across genres is a bit wobbly.  An average FPS seems to be 7 for them and a decent FPS 8 and anything they think is very good (whether original or not) gets a 9 - for the most part, there are exceptions.  I've noticed with RPGs they seem to be harsher for some reason (or at least based on the RGP reviews I've used them for.  DA got a 5 which seemed low - I didn't think it was amazing but it seemed a solid 7 minimum - and now FFXIII gets a 5.

It's just another view, of course, but assuming their is some form of consistency of standards reviews (professional ones at any rate) shouldn't vary that much.  I mean you'll always get some outliers, but to take film as an analogy look at most professional reviews of The Hurt Locker and they're very consistent, because the criteria of what makes a 'great' film is fairly consistent.

The reason I posted, given I normally bypass these kinds of topics, is that I'm increasingly of the view that the videogame industry, from a professional reviewing point of view, is possible leaning towards being a bit rubbish.  Of course there will always be some films, books, games, etc that divide critics, but increasingly and specifically for videogames review consistency seems to be out the window.  There are reviews that seem little more than adverts pushing the hype and passing out 10s like candy, reviews that can't seem to agree on whether a basic gameplay mechanic is good or bad and reviews which are just plain uninformed.

Now it may be I'm out of sync with changing demands, and people want reviews as buying guides or based purely on an individual opinion of fun, but without some consistency I don't see how you can judge (and I suspect it's this very lack of consistency plus a desire to have a buying guide that's lead to the rise of sites like Metacritic) between one review and another.  Are the EDGE 5 and another site's 9 simply two different opinions, not professional ones based on a common sense of criteria, but more like 2 guys in a pub giving you there view, or is one closer to the mark than the other?

Anyway.  I just thought it was an interesting score that seemed (even allowing for other scores in the 6/7/8 range) right on the edge (pardon the pun) of the spectrum of scores for the game.

 

 

Well you make an interesting point when you mention about what the "criteria of what makes a 'great' film is fairly consistent".

But the issue here, the criteria that makes a great RPG are very different from what makes a great FPS, and I think that's how EDGE does it's reviews. It's obvious they don't review in terms of what makes a great game (especially pointed out by aragod with those scores in Mario Kart and NSMBW), but it's all about perspective.

In the end, you should find reviewers that have similar tastes and beliefs in reviewing games as yourself, and follw those reviewers, and ignore everyone else.



r505Matt said:
Alic0004 said:
r505Matt said:
 

Yeah, but it's quite possible that you've got a problem when you define an RPG fan as "someone who thought Mass Effect 2 was a great game."  Let me give you an example.  My girlfriend is sitting here next to me -- she's not a gamer at all, but she's played through four of the Final Fantasies, Fable II, The Longest Journey, and a few other games.  She saw a TV commercial for Mass Effect 2 during a Viking's game a while ago and it made her laugh at how cheesy it looked.  I know this is impossible to understand to people like us, who read all the latest opinions about which games are great and which deserve to die, but the fact is, there are people who would never play video games if they were all like Mass Effect 2.  Her opinion probably shouldn't matter about ME2 -- it doesn't affect my ability to enjoy the game that she scoffs at the somewhat generic sci-fi character designs whenever she sees me playing it and asks "when is Final Fantasy coming out?"  But it makes it clear to me at least that many Final Fantasy games have strengths that ME2 doesn't even attempt to have, such as a Fantasy/Science Fiction world which is hard to define, a beauty which catches the eye of people who think most video games look horribly generic, and a type of gameplay which is fun even for people who almost never pick up a controller.

 

In the same way that Wii Fit fans should be discounted from most RPG reviews, because it can safely be assumed they won't like them, any subset of players who can be depended upon to universally hate a game probably shouldn't be considered its target audience by a reviewer.  I know sometimes reviewers just want to voice their own opinion, audience be damned -- and personally I think that's fine.  My worry is that it may be becoming a whole movement of "we like WRPGs, so JRPGs that aren't imitating them, no matter how polished and well executed they are, have to be taken to task."

 

It's funny you mention that because I agree with her, those commericials are AWFUL. ME2 is one of my favorite games for strengths that no Final Fantasy has come close to having, namely an excellent sense of pace, and a deep, "realistic", political universe. By realistic, I mean there are plenty of small things, like the codex information stuff, that really adds to the depth of the game. In FF games (or really just JRPGs), it's not unheard of to just walk into someone's house, take their money, and walk out without them even batting an eye. Some people are like "well it's your reward for exploring" but I say "why would the people in a game care if you explore?". In those JRPGs, I feel you are more of a bystander, in games that aren't like that, you can actually feel like you participate in shaping the story (even if it's linear and you have very little actual effect other than just going through the game). I have yet to play a FF game that can even nearly reach that level of immersion.

But that's also okay, I'm not saying thats a bad thing, but it's just something that FF games haven't been able to do yet.

I do not think it's a case of "make JRPGs more like WRPGs" as it is a case of "we've seen this before, about 20 times, do something more". You can talk as much as you want about gameplay differences from each FF game to the next, but when it boils down, there's always this feeling that "this is a Final Fantasy game". Which is good, and bad. It's kind of like (if you're a Foo Fighters fan) you hear a Foo Fighters song, and even if you don't know the song, you KNOW it's Foo Fighters, they have their own sound that's very easy to recognize. Plenty of great bands are like this, and some of them fall into a trap of being able to use that as a platform to propel their music as opposed to a crutch to hinder themselves. Maybe reviewers, namely western reviewers, are starting to feel that the "this is a FF game" feeling is starting to hold the series back, and would like to see the series transform. That's at least how I've felt.

Yes, there's a new combat system, a new levelling system, new story/characters. But there's something else, a sort of abstract thing, that needs to be re-worked. Maybe this is how some reviewers see it too.

Not to mention, if it's boring, it's boring, no matter how you spin it.

 

Yeah, those were some bad commercials.  But seeing me play the game hasn't made her any more interested.  She also has no interest in Dragon Age, which is my personal favorite RPG in a long time.

The problem is that the only change you've suggested for a Final Fantasy game is that it could aspire to have some of the features that Mass Effect 2 has.  Your entire post is talking about how great an experience Mass Effect 2 is, and how a Final Fantasy game (which neither of us has played yet?) just doesn't match up to it, because it feels more like its own type of game.

My only point is, the games are different, and it worries me when people get them confused.

When I play FFXIII, at least, I will be playing it to see whether it's a fun game, not how much advice it's taken from reviewers who think they know what direction gaming is going in.  I'm hopeful it will be fun in its own way.

 

 



 

Rounding up EDGE scores for SE's "big 3"...

 

  • Final Fantasy III (SNES) 8
  • Final Fantasy VII (PS) 9
  • Final Fantasy VII (PC) 9
  • Final Fantasy VIII (PS) 9
  • Final Fantasy IX (PS) 8
  • Final Fantasy X (PS2) 6
  • Final Fantasy X-2 (PS2) 7
  • Final Fantasy XI: Online (PC/PS2) 8
  • Final Fantasy XII (PS2) 9
  • Final Fantasy III (DS) 6
  • Final Fantasy IV (DS) 7
  • Final Fantasy XIII (PS3/360) 5
  • Dragon Quest VIII: Journey of the Cursed King (PS2) 8
  • Dragon Quest IV: Chapters of the Chosen (DS) 8
  • Dragon Quest V: Hand of the Heavenly Bride (DS) 8
  • Kingdom Hearts (PS2) 7
  • Kingdom Hearts II (PS2) 7

 



Around the Network
perpride said:
kowenicki said:
well we cant even say they dont like JRPG's

they gave Demons Soul a 9/10

So can we say they are on crack then?

OP - I'm sorry, and I know that everyone is entitled to their own opinnion, but that score is a load of shit. The game deserves a 7 strictly based on its production values. Obviousley critics these days have forgotten what it is to be a critic. If you hate Final Fantasy thats fine. But you can't give the game a low score because YOU hate Final Fantasy. I read the first five lines of that review and already said fuck it. It's like getting a fan of rap music to rate a death metal album. The only way he can do it is if he has extensive knowledge of death metal albums and can actually take an unbiased look at it. If you go in with the mentality "FUCK death metal I hate it" then you will deffinitley give the album a low score. That's what's sad about reviewers nowadays, they cant put their own childish biases aside.

Actually, I know I went over this with someone before, may have been you, I think you don't know what it is to be a critic.  Again, a game shouldn't get an A for effort.  Production values don't get you an automatic 7.

As far as I see it, this is the usual game gets a low score, fans call the reviewer worthless thread.  Meh.



And read the review, seems fair enough.

FFXII did the same thing-- they both made you play through 20 or so hours of bad before it finally gets good, just apparently the bad in XIII is worse than the bad in XII.

I don't care so much about the linear stuff and the no towns, I actually like not having to deal the inventory, but I don't like being punished for the first 20 or so hours of a game.

Since that has been a fairly consistent thing in reviews, I'm probably going to pass on this game.



jarrod said:

Rounding up EDGE scores for SE's "big 3"...

 

  • Final Fantasy III (SNES) 8
  • Final Fantasy VII (PS) 9
  • Final Fantasy VII (PC) 9
  • Final Fantasy VIII (PS) 9
  • Final Fantasy IX (PS) 8
  • Final Fantasy X (PS2) 6
  • Final Fantasy X-2 (PS2) 7
  • Final Fantasy XI: Online (PC/PS2) 8
  • Final Fantasy XII (PS2) 9
  • Final Fantasy III (DS) 6
  • Final Fantasy IV (DS) 7
  • Final Fantasy XIII (PS3/360) 5
  • Dragon Quest VIII: Journey of the Cursed King (PS2) 8
  • Dragon Quest IV: Chapters of the Chosen (DS) 8
  • Dragon Quest V: Hand of the Heavenly Bride (DS) 8
  • Kingdom Hearts (PS2) 7
  • Kingdom Hearts II (PS2) 7

 

I've said it before and I'll say it again: up to this point, their Final Fantasy reviews aren't bad (though IV DS jumps out at me, bleh). Doesn't mean I agree with them about XIII (I won't know about that for some time), but they aren't exactly biased against the series.

Edit: Aaaand I'm resolving myself to having an orange topic in my Recent Threads until I post in like a dozen more to push it out. Ugh



Bruno Muñoz B said:
In my opinion if this is true Final Fantasy XIII score as a role-playing game is harsh but in some way fair.

"Final Fantasy XIII changes the basic formula of the series radically – to an extent that no pre-release talk hinted at – and strikes out on its own. Even the most basic assumptions about what a Final Fantasy game should be are left at the door: this can barely be described as a roleplaying game. You won’t come across a single town worthy of the label, talk to shopkeepers or be swept into an intricate minigame. Your characters don’t even level up for the first few hours. It’s best to get the beginning out of the way: it’s a disaster of pacing that both bores and condescends to the player. There’s an excellently rendered cutscene to start off, and for the next two hours you’ll do little but run forward through walled-in environments and press a single button over and over to dismiss enemies. By the time you encounter anything approaching a challenge, FFXIII is stirring one emotion in particular: boredom."

You know... I felt this way back when I was around 8 or 9 and playing pokemon... It was fun back then but now it bores me to death.

I got a very similar feel when I played FFXIII. Some people are saying that JRPG's are always like this but you don't get points for staying in the past... 

@Pepride

7 off production value? It kinda sucks when I here people taking visuals as such an important factor... This is a JRPG. Story, gameplay, characters- these are what's important.



4 ≈ One

A review is an opinion and just because that opinion isn't yours doesn't mean they are wrong.

I personally hate the game.