I saw we aren't using gamerankings anymore since they are so skewed

You guys actually waste your time with games rated 90 and 95? If you only count AAAAA exclusives (97 and up on Metacritic, as defined by me right now), Wii has Super Mario Galaxy, 360 has zip, and PS3 has zilch.

Actually the Xbox 360 and the PS3 would have GTAIV, which is a longer game than SMG.

You just debunked the Wii's existence based on AAAAA titles.

Theres a lot of stuff I disagree with on this. First dont think you can say a game is AAA just because it get above a certain rating on a certain site. Second, why do GOTY editions count as separate games? (and what gives LBP GOTY a better score than regular LBP).

Theres also several games on that list I woundnt consider AAA because I either dont think they are up to it (Geometry Wars) or because they dont have the massive following or userbase (Ghost Recon), because they have yearly releases (FIFA 10) or because they are dying out (Guitar Hero).
Thats my opinion but its hard to say what exactly a game has to be to be AAA

Nintendo did say something

Goty editions usually come straight with all the updates, all the downloadable content ($$$) and more at a cheaper price.

God, I swear I saw someone with an avatar with that, how could I forget (the picture looks funnier when its bigger, though) 

We only use Metacritic for fanboy list wars. According to Metacritic 360 has 27 games that have AAA ranking. PS3 has only 19 games that have AAA ranking.

Metaccritic>>>>Game rankings.

That game's not an exclusive.  It's available on 3 platforms.  There is only one AAAAA exclusive this generation, Super Mario Galaxy.

Last generation the PS2 had zero AAAAA exclusives, XBox had 1 (Halo), GameCube had 1 (Metroid Prime), and DreamCast had 2 (NFL 2K1 and Soulcalibur).

This thread summarises the elements of VGchartz I hate so much.